test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The T6 Odyssey

Some of you were there ...

In February 2012, to commemorate STO's 2nd Anniversary, Cryptic presented Starfleet's newest, largest and most powerful ship ... the Odyssey-class Star Cruiser. This 25th century ship-of-the line was one that many had hoped for, a true dreadnought class cruiser, combining the size and majesty of the legendary Galaxy with the sleek grace of the Sovereign. The ship's design was born from a contest for players (I forget the name of the player who won) and sparked heated debate over its design details, most notably the double neck connecting the Odyssey's chevron to her hull. Shortly thereafter, the Odyssey-class U.S.S. Enterprise-F under the command of Andorian Captain Va'kel Shon succeeded the Sovereign-class Enterprise-E as the Federation flagship in STO's version of the Star Trek Universe. It was exciting. During the anniversary, captains were able to visit Utopia Planitia Shipyards at Mars and take the U.S.S. Odyssey out of spacedock in the one-shot mission "The Odyssey Class" (renamed "First Contact Day" in April 2014) ... At the same time, KDF players got their own Bortasqu' Dreadnought Battlecruiser.

In general, big cruiser captains were thrilled, even moreso when a few weeks later the Zen Store offered three new advanced versions of the Odyssey - tactical, operations and science variants - which set a precedent for later releases of even newer and more advanced ships.

Now ... Season Two was a long time ago in MMO years and the Odyssey is over three years old, though still a force to be reconned with as a T5-U upgrade, when properly rigged and captained. But we have T6 ships now, with command, intelligence and pilot capabilities, some of them nearly as large as and most of them more versatile than the Odyssey. Yet, U.S.S. Enterprise-F remains Starfleet's flagship.

It's time for an Odyssey refit across the board, in order to maintain the class's position as the premier ship of the Fleet.

Cryptic could do this as they usually do - release a T6 version in the Zen Store (most likely a bundle with the three division variants). Costly, especially for those who have suffered along and struggled to maintain their Odysseys at a competitive level for three years. Or, they could set another precedent and make the T5-U Odyssey the first starship upgradable with a token to T6. I'd prefer the latter. But, either option is acceptable.

Gentlemen, it is time.

We have T6 versions of the Galaxy, a class that was made obsolete by the Sovereign in 2377. Time for the Odyssey-class Star Cruiser to get some well-deserved attention. She should be one version equal to any Fleet T6, with one Universal Commander Bridge Officer seat and Tactical/Pilot, Engineer/Command and Science/Intelligence seats, one additional tactical console and 5 forward/4 aft weapons points. The ability to launch a Captain's Yacht and shuttles as combat pets should be standard on all variants

The developers have heeded player demands in the past. Let it be heard.
«1

Comments

  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    Bortas Command Cruiser first.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,864 Arc User
    Umm...I wouldn't say the Sovereign was built to replace the Galaxy...the Galaxy is a completely different ship from the Sovereign...

    The Galaxy was built for exploration and housing families...where are the Sovereign was built to combat the likes of the Borg and Dominion.

    Commander Uni isn't going happen...Pilot isn't going to happen or more than one specialization seating isn't going to happen as they save that only for lock box ships. Sure not going to see it have more weapons than any other ship in the game.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • lindalefflindaleff Member Posts: 3,734 Arc User
    I STILL use my Odyssey. And I cannot be bothered to replace it.
    I completed a 2-man CSE, ISE, and KASE, Optionals included. And I soloed Winter Invasion.
    My Ship Builds: USS Conqueror, HMS Victorious, HMS Concord, ISS Queen Elizabeth, Black Widow III
    Click here to view my DeviantArt.
  • grayfoxjamesgrayfoxjames Member Posts: 1,516 Arc User
    I've been flying my Odyssey since I got it back in February of 2013 I think it was. Been flying her ever since...only ship I fly ever. It's the "flag" ship of my fleet you can say, and many ships have come close to replacing it most notibly; the Avenger and Guardian...but both fell short. I support a T6 Fleet Science Odyssey Refit/Retrofit but I highly doubt it will get an extra weapon slot and/or so many universal seatings.

    To be quite frank with you I LOVE the current seating of my Science Oddy and really wouldn't want to change it. I'm all for making one of the seats a command/something but keeping the same seating if we wanted to.
    Fleet Admiral Thomas Winston James a.k.a. The Grayfox
    Fleet Leader of:
    Liberty Task Force/Liberty Honor Guard
    Pride of the Federation/Pride of the Empire
    Liberty Guardians
    U.S.S. Liberty, NX-42813-L, T-6 Legendary Odyssey Class

    Game Handle: Grayfox@GrayfoxJames
    Website: https://www.libertytaskforce.com
    Armada (STOFA Member Fleet): https://www.libertytaskforce.com/stofa
    Discord: https://discord.gg/bGp9N7z
    Twitter: STOFA@LTFGrayfox
    Email: CSDynamix@Hotmail.com
  • reynoldsxdreynoldsxd Member Posts: 977 Arc User
    The sovereign is an evolution from the excelsior line.
    The Galaxy has no equal or better.


    That aside: yay for the old flags getting love. Except the scimi. i do not see how that needs an upgrade.
  • thomaselkinsthomaselkins Member Posts: 575 Arc User
    I love my Tactical Odyssey T5U but I would consider updating it for a Tactical Odyssey T6 if they offer one. Stat wise I wouldn't expect the T6 to be too different from the T5U, but I've been wanting that Type 7 material for the Odyssey and that alone might be worth it. I wonder if the T6 Odyssey would have an updated design as well? I heard the current Odyssey wasn't exactly designed to with part swapping in mind but they could always make it work. Maybe even update the Odyssey with a newer model so that it can swap parts easier. Or not.
  • makocallowaymakocalloway Member Posts: 455 Arc User
    Agreed. I want my T6 sci Oddy.
    5rFUCPd.png

  • doyouwdoyouw Member Posts: 200 Arc User
    T6 tac & sci bortasqs !
    Dark Side (KDF)
    HOUSE OF BORG
    "I am FLATULUS of Borg, Resistance if Futile! Prepare to pull my finger!"

    cube.jpg
  • hartzillahartzilla Member Posts: 1,177 Arc User
    edited August 2015
    lianthelia wrote: »
    The Galaxy was built for exploration and housing families...where are the Sovereign was built to combat the likes of the Borg and Dominion.

    I figured the Sovereign was taking the Galaxy and striping out the no longer necessary frills such as civilian family housing.
    reynoldsxd wrote: »
    The Galaxy has no equal or better.

    It exploded if you looked at it funny.

    Besides the Enterprise-E was the most advanced ship in the fleet a year after it lunched which kind of implies Soverign > Galaxy.
  • reynoldsxdreynoldsxd Member Posts: 977 Arc User
    hartzilla wrote: »
    lianthelia wrote: »
    The Galaxy was built for exploration and housing families...where are the Sovereign was built to combat the likes of the Borg and Dominion.

    I figured the Sovereign was taking the Galaxy and striping out the no longer necessary frills such as civilian family housing.
    reynoldsxd wrote: »
    The Galaxy has no equal or better.

    It exploded if you looked at it funny.

    Besides the Enterprise-E was the most advanced ship in the fleet a year after it lunched which kind of implies Soverign > Galaxy.

    sigh....

    If the Sovereign class enterprise E had its own series, it would also have endured the up and downs of writer whim.

    Fact is: Galaxy Class starships tank significant hull damage before buckling.

    The Jem'hardar in the DS9 episode "The Jem'hardar" had to resort to ramming the Odyssey to prevent it from retreating. They shot at it for several minutes, right through the shields. The Odyssey tanked a superior foe, a foe that later would continue to oneshot lesser vessels.

    The USS Galaxy, in the Attack on Chintoka, also took several massive hits to the hull and kept right on trucking while lesser ships buckled and spun out of control.

    The Galaxy class starship formations that fought in the Battle for DS9 in sacrifice of angles stood up and held the line versus a numerically superior force. No losses reported, victory was achieved after the klingon task force performed a wonderful backstab on the dominion formation, breaking up the line enough so that the defiant could move on to ds9.
    The Battle raged on after the defiant got out, and Starfleet send the Dominion into retreat after having even more ships break through.

    It should be duly noted that the Galaxys were the first big ships to actually get into firing range of the dominion battle line. No losses reported.

    The Enterprise D itself was subjected to a wide plethora of deadly assailants and negative space wedgies. It tanked shots from a super powerful alien starship (that dished out godly damage per volley) that was conjured up by what amounts to a physical god.

    She took romulan surprise attacks, tanked the borg and many others.

    It was the producers who decided the Galaxy class needed to go. And so they gave her an embarrassing, pointless and TRIBBLE end. Just like they did with kirk. The guy who also died in that film.


    As for the Sovereign: Its the evolution of the Constitution->Excelsior line.
    A sleek, maneuverable class of battle cruiser. And it was good.
    But it never went into competition with the Galaxy.


    Why is it then, that the Galaxy has no equal?

    Because Starfleet never made one.
    Take a look back at what the Galaxy was designed for, and what it ended up being used for. It was supposed to be a long range explorer, taking families with it since it was supposed to go into unknown space and "stay out there" for a long time.
    Real exploration. Go where no one went before, take not of everything interesting that later will be revisited by dedicated science vessels.
    It was supposed to go on missions that would eclipse the 5 year runs the first Constitutions would go on (simply because of the distance involved). The ship class was designed in part as a luxury hotel exactly because it was not expected for them to lounge around federation territory.
    They had families because who would leave their kids for 10 years for one such mission?
    But the ships never went out like that. They were constantly kept around federation territory for various reasons.

    That is why the Intrepid was devised, the same role, but leaner and built with the newest tech at the time.

    The Galaxy has no equal because starfleet realized that the design idea and the idea of the mission setup was rapidly going outmoded by new advances in technology. Scanners, communications, drive systems.


    The Galaxy is a beautiful, unique misstep. That had no equal.

    And its in Sto, in a new, wonderfully done high quality model with a very decent boff setup and good base stats. I am happy to own one.

    I am looking forward to seeing the sovy and odysssey and the other t5 ships getting a revisit too.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited August 2015
    I've said countless times, but what's one more? If/When the time comes to release these flagships at the Tier #6 level, there needs to be significant differences between them. We don't need another set of bundles, with the same ship having slightly different stats.

    It is my opinion that they should come something like this:

    Odyssey Command Cruiser (console layout: 3/5/3)
    Commander Engineer
    Lieutenant Commander Tactical/Command
    Lieutenant Commander Science/Intelligence
    Lieutenant Universal
    Ensign Science
    + Hanger (x1)

    Bortas Command Cruiser (console layout: 4/4/3)
    Commander Engineer
    Lieutenant Commander Tactical/Pilot
    Lieutenant Commander Science/Command
    Lieutenant Universal
    Ensign Tactical
    + Hanger (x1)

    Scimitar Dreadnought Cruiser (console layout: 5/3/3)
    Commander Tactical
    Lieutenant Commander Science/Intelligence
    Lieutenant Engineer/Pilot
    Lieutenant Tactical
    Lieutenant Universal
    + Hanger (x2)
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • reynoldsxdreynoldsxd Member Posts: 977 Arc User
    C-store ships do not come with this sort of boff seats. sorry. ^^
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    But on this occasion, they should.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    lt cmdr tac/command? Nobody will use that seat for command powers xD
    I need a beer.

  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    lt cmdr tac/command? Nobody will use that seat for command powers xD
    Whilst many wont, some will, especially if they're working on a supporting cruiser.

    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited August 2015
    There are two things I would like to see if the Odyssey, Bortas and Scimitar get a Tier 6 3-pack each (or 9-pack all in all):
    1) 3 new ship models with interchangeable components. Oddy and Bortas only have a single skin, and that's ultra-lame.
    2) If there are 3 variants, I think each should have a different specialization. Varying it around Tac/Eng/Sci again seems a bit boring.


    I would only really consider spending money on them if the 1st is true. Without some decent customization options, I am just not interested in any of those ships, and certainly not a pack of them.

    If they don't want to do that, they can leave it as a single ship per faction. Probably given away in some kind of event. Next year is the 50-year anniversary of Star Trek. Great opportunity IMO.


    If it's a pack along the lines I mention above:
    • Commander Engineering
    • Lt.Cmdr Universal | Intel / Command / Pilot (specialization depends on the variant)
    • Lt. Science
    • Lt. Tactical
    • Lt. Universal
    • Consoles: 5 Engineering, 3 Tactical, 3 Science
    • The usual yadda yadda [...]
    It never sat well with me that the Oddy and Bortas had a variant with access to sensor analysis. Not sure what to do with it if you don't have a dedicated science variant anymore. Maybe actually give the ships access to a subset of the Specialization abilities they are associated with? Turn the Sensor Analysis aspect into a new console?
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • lsegnlsegn Member Posts: 594 Arc User
    Why anyone would fly that hideous monstrosity is beyond me. What makes it worse is that it's officially part of canon as the next Enterprise.... Hellen Keller is not an artist Cryptic.
  • ascaladarascaladar Member Posts: 186 Arc User
    lsegn wrote: »
    Why anyone would fly that hideous monstrosity is beyond me. What makes it worse is that it's officially part of canon as the next Enterprise.... Hellen Keller is not an artist Cryptic.

    To personally annoy you of course.^^

    I also love my old Oddy that I had since April 2012 and would love a T6 update for her.
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    flash525 wrote: »
    lt cmdr tac/command? Nobody will use that seat for command powers xD
    Whilst many wont, some will, especially if they're working on a supporting cruiser.

    With command powers being as broadly worthless as they are compared to tac boff powers, I really don't think ANYONE would use that slot for command powers. Not to mention how few people actually coordinate and play as a team in this game!
    I need a beer.

  • mainamaina Member Posts: 430 Arc User
    edited August 2015
    lsegn wrote: »
    Why anyone would fly that hideous monstrosity is beyond me. What makes it worse is that it's officially part of canon as the next Enterprise.... Hellen Keller is not an artist Cryptic.


    Best bridge yet!

    Oh, and if you can't make it Pew-pew, you suck?​​
    gHF1ABR.jpg
  • raj011raj011 Member Posts: 987 Arc User
    Has there any word on a T6 Odyssey Class?
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,864 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    The only thing I have to say about those stats is odds are none of them will see pilot unless they decide to go 180 on what was planned...so far Pilot has not been seen on anything that doesn't have double digit turn rates...nor do they seem to put dual specialization on anything but Premium luck based ships.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • samt1996samt1996 Member Posts: 2,856 Arc User
    Ack! Why anyone thought it was a good idea to put that hideous whale in the game is beyond me, in terms of ship design it is a regression from the sovereign class. I wouldn't be so pissed off if they didn't officially make it part of canon... There were SO much better designs to choose from. Not only is it an inferior Enterprise design but it gives the Chimera a run for its money in the ugly department.
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    The Odyssey class is visually one of the most pleasing cruisers in STO for me.

    As I couldn't decide which variant to upgrade and had overall many other occupations, my Odyssey 3-pack sits unused so far. Therefore the acquisition of a T6 version wouldn't be quite as torturous as those of several T5 vessels I have already upgraded in the meantime.

    But there lie many problems ahead including: How do you T6 a three-pack? Would all the new consoles be part of the old console sets (thus making anywhere from a 4 to 6-piece console set)? If they only made one variant of the T6 version, would they still keep it Fleet level as if it were a three-pack (same faction) set?

    As much as I love the Odyssey, I'm not sure I want the Devs to think about all that since it would likely result in inconsistencies, exceptions etc.



    Oh, and the Command BortasQu' is great!
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • raj011raj011 Member Posts: 987 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    At the moment I am saving up zen for may be the 3 pack Odyssey and Vesta class, so I want and need to know if they will be doing a T6 versions for the Odyssey and Vesta class?
  • kyle223catkyle223cat Member Posts: 584 Arc User
    reynoldsxd wrote: »
    hartzilla wrote: »
    lianthelia wrote: »
    The Galaxy was built for exploration and housing families...where are the Sovereign was built to combat the likes of the Borg and Dominion.

    I figured the Sovereign was taking the Galaxy and striping out the no longer necessary frills such as civilian family housing.
    reynoldsxd wrote: »
    The Galaxy has no equal or better.

    It exploded if you looked at it funny.

    Besides the Enterprise-E was the most advanced ship in the fleet a year after it lunched which kind of implies Soverign > Galaxy.

    sigh....

    If the Sovereign class enterprise E had its own series, it would also have endured the up and downs of writer whim.

    Fact is: Galaxy Class starships tank significant hull damage before buckling.

    The Jem'hardar in the DS9 episode "The Jem'hardar" had to resort to ramming the Odyssey to prevent it from retreating. They shot at it for several minutes, right through the shields. The Odyssey tanked a superior foe, a foe that later would continue to oneshot lesser vessels.

    The USS Galaxy, in the Attack on Chintoka, also took several massive hits to the hull and kept right on trucking while lesser ships buckled and spun out of control.

    The Galaxy class starship formations that fought in the Battle for DS9 in sacrifice of angles stood up and held the line versus a numerically superior force. No losses reported, victory was achieved after the klingon task force performed a wonderful backstab on the dominion formation, breaking up the line enough so that the defiant could move on to ds9.
    The Battle raged on after the defiant got out, and Starfleet send the Dominion into retreat after having even more ships break through.

    It should be duly noted that the Galaxys were the first big ships to actually get into firing range of the dominion battle line. No losses reported.

    The Enterprise D itself was subjected to a wide plethora of deadly assailants and negative space wedgies. It tanked shots from a super powerful alien starship (that dished out godly damage per volley) that was conjured up by what amounts to a physical god.

    She took romulan surprise attacks, tanked the borg and many others.

    It was the producers who decided the Galaxy class needed to go. And so they gave her an embarrassing, pointless and TRIBBLE end. Just like they did with kirk. The guy who also died in that film.


    As for the Sovereign: Its the evolution of the Constitution->Excelsior line.
    A sleek, maneuverable class of battle cruiser. And it was good.
    But it never went into competition with the Galaxy.


    Why is it then, that the Galaxy has no equal?

    Because Starfleet never made one.
    Take a look back at what the Galaxy was designed for, and what it ended up being used for. It was supposed to be a long range explorer, taking families with it since it was supposed to go into unknown space and "stay out there" for a long time.
    Real exploration. Go where no one went before, take not of everything interesting that later will be revisited by dedicated science vessels.
    It was supposed to go on missions that would eclipse the 5 year runs the first Constitutions would go on (simply because of the distance involved). The ship class was designed in part as a luxury hotel exactly because it was not expected for them to lounge around federation territory.
    They had families because who would leave their kids for 10 years for one such mission?
    But the ships never went out like that. They were constantly kept around federation territory for various reasons.

    That is why the Intrepid was devised, the same role, but leaner and built with the newest tech at the time.

    The Galaxy has no equal because starfleet realized that the design idea and the idea of the mission setup was rapidly going outmoded by new advances in technology. Scanners, communications, drive systems.


    The Galaxy is a beautiful, unique misstep. That had no equal.

    And its in Sto, in a new, wonderfully done high quality model with a very decent boff setup and good base stats. I am happy to own one.

    I am looking forward to seeing the sovy and odysssey and the other t5 ships getting a revisit too.

    This! ^^ I agree with this 2000%
    da84303d8bc4080b9860968f634f98682215bbe5.gifv
  • alcyoneserenealcyoneserene Member Posts: 2,413 Arc User
    1) 3 new ship models with interchangeable components. Oddy and Bortas only have a single skin, and that's ultra-lame.
    2) If there are 3 variants, I think each should have a different specialization. Varying it around Tac/Eng/Sci again seems a bit boring.
    [..]
    Lt.Cmdr Universal | Intel / Command / Pilot (specialization depends on the variant)
    Agreed. It also wouldn't cut into the lockbox ship sales as those do mixed-specialization. For standard C-Store, having single spec variety on the same flagship class would be the only novelty left considering new ship specializations (intel, pilot, command) are reserved for pure cryptic designs only.

    We're also on a cruiser saturated market that's also filled with powerful command-spec BC, light intel-spec, and intel cruisers (Guardian) that even have battle cloak (Aelahl). Roms still have zero carriers, and as with KDF zero T6 science. Trying to raise a cross-faction flagship 3 or 9 pack better offer something truly well designed and thought out and fun.

    I consider the Odyssey the best looking ship in the game, and I do hope they raise the bar even higher than they have with the Arbiter, Andromeda, and Hestia at least just this one time for the flagships.

    T6 Scimitar should be even more OP, because Romulan Dreadnought, and because it isn't fun without a joker card in the deck.
    Y945Yzx.jpg
    Devs: Provide the option to Turn OFF full screen flashes from enemy ship explosions
    · ♥ · ◦.¸¸. ◦'¯`·. (Ɏ) V A N U _ S O V E R E I G N T Y (Ɏ) .·´¯'◦.¸¸. ◦ · ♡ ·
    «» \▼/ T E R R A N ¦ R E P U B L I C \▼/ «»
    ﴾﴿ ₪ṩ ||| N A N I T E S Y S T E M S : B L A C K | O P S ||| ₪ṩ ﴾﴿
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,864 Arc User
    toiva wrote: »
    The Odyssey class is visually one of the most pleasing cruisers in STO for me.

    As I couldn't decide which variant to upgrade and had overall many other occupations, my Odyssey 3-pack sits unused so far. Therefore the acquisition of a T6 version wouldn't be quite as torturous as those of several T5 vessels I have already upgraded in the meantime.

    But there lie many problems ahead including: How do you T6 a three-pack? Would all the new consoles be part of the old console sets (thus making anywhere from a 4 to 6-piece console set)? If they only made one variant of the T6 version, would they still keep it Fleet level as if it were a three-pack (same faction) set?

    As much as I love the Odyssey, I'm not sure I want the Devs to think about all that since it would likely result in inconsistencies, exceptions etc.



    Oh, and the Command BortasQu' is great!

    I'd imagine it would be a single 3 pack...I can't see them making individual 3 packs much like I couldn't see people using a 6 piece set...unless they went out of their way to make the consoles and or set bonuses incredibly OP.

    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • kyrrokkyrrok Member Posts: 1,352 Arc User
    The Oddysey and Scimitar are good ships, and a T6 version would be even better. I wonder if the poor Bort will finally get the justice it deserves that was denied to it at T5.
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    I endorse this idea/product/service. (Circle whichever applies)
    ExtxpTp.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.