test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Well, it's not quite a T5 connie...

thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,167 Arc User
But it's probably the closest thing we'll get:

WuYQCx7.jpg

ua8NZAj.jpg

It actually reminds me a bit of the JJ-prise :p

The-Grand-Nagus
Join Date: Sep 2008

og9Zoh0.jpg

Comments

  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    The Nagus...actually HAPPY?!?! RUN!!!!!!!!!!
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • zobovorzobovor Member Posts: 198 Arc User
    edited August 2015
    Closest thing is the Ambassador IMHO .
    Round secondary hull, thin "neck" , round saucer .
    (yeah, the pylons & nacelles loose the look, but ... well it is what it is)

    On the bright side , we can continue to ask for a T5 Connie, as T5 is no longer "endgame" since we moved to T6 .
    (Go-go thin loophole! :wink: )
  • berginsbergins Member Posts: 3,454 Arc User
    zobovor wrote: »
    On the bright side , we can continue to ask for a T5 Connie, as T5 is no longer "endgame" since we moved to T6 .
    (Go-go thin loophole! :wink: )

    No, that'd require them admitting that their claims that a T5 ship was viable in end game content was wrong.

    Won't ever happen, not til we get T7, anyways...
    "Logic is a little tweeting bird chirping in a meadow. Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell BAD." - Spock
  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    edited August 2015
    zobovor wrote: »
    On the bright side , we can continue to ask for a T5 Connie, as T5 is no longer "endgame" since we moved to T6 .
    (Go-go thin loophole! :wink: )

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/forums#/discussion/1159287/frequently-created-threads-f-c-t

    Loophole closed actually. Not that you'll return to this particular thread and find this particular post and click this particular link and scroll down to find the section about T5/T6/Endgame Constitutions anyway, but I thought I might as well give it a try.
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    edited August 2015
    a3001 wrote: »
    zobovor wrote: »
    On the bright side , we can continue to ask for a T5 Connie, as T5 is no longer "endgame" since we moved to T6 .
    (Go-go thin loophole! :wink: )

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/forums#/discussion/1159287/frequently-created-threads-f-c-t

    Loophole closed actually. Not that you'll return to this particular thread and find this particular post and click this particular link and scroll down to find the section about T5/T6/Endgame Constitutions anyway, but I thought I might as well give it a try.

    this is why I want a t6 Exeter! Its a cryptic design and not a connie :D

    as for the original post.... the more I see those nacells the more I hate em
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    Only Kirk ship is the true Kirk ship! ;)
    This is Sulu ship! :rage:
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • lizweilizwei Member Posts: 936 Arc User
    It actually reminds me a bit of the JJ-prise :p

    I don't see that at all.
    Why would you want a ship to resemble that badly put together garbage scow anyway?
Sign In or Register to comment.