test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

What Energy Weapon Type, Do You Find Yourself Using The Most?

24

Comments

  • cidjackcidjack Member Posts: 2,017 Arc User
    Nanite Disruptor, for all toons, all ships.
    Armada: Multiplying fleet projects in need of dilithium by 13."
    95bced8038c91ec6f880d510e6fd302f366a776c4c5761e5f7931d491667a45e.jpgvia Imgflip Meme Generator
  • kittyflofykittyflofy Member Posts: 1,004 Arc User
    deokkent wrote: »

    For a long while, tetryons dominated DPS wise in PvP and PvE, and still currently compete with other types. People are just being excessively anal attentive about a 2.5% proc, kind of extreme...

    The fact is, tetryon works as well as any other energy type. People forget that, besides the proc, it is a damage dealt, and in that moment it doesnt matter if it is tetryon or watever. Tetryons seem to be more hard to manage, boosting a tetryon build is not as satisfactory as other energy types, but they work just fine.
  • battykoda0battykoda0 Member Posts: 959 Arc User
    With the free proc on antiproton, why use anything else? +Guaranteed critd trumps a minuscule chance to disable a subsystem any day.
    Wow. There is a new KDF Science ship. I'll be!
  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    Phasers and Quants on FED.

    Dirsuptor (flavor immaterial) and Photons on KDF

    Rom Plasma and Plasma torps on RR.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • gradiigradii Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    rmy1081 wrote: »
    It depends on the character and build I'm playing, so I can't really pick one...

    I play mostly feds, so phaser.

    "He shall be my finest warrior, this generic man who was forced upon me.
    Like a badass I shall make him look, and in the furnace of war I shall forge him.
    he shall be of iron will and steely sinew.
    In great armour I shall clad him and with the mightiest weapons he shall be armed.
    He will be untouched by plague or disease; no sickness shall blight him.
    He shall have such tactics, strategies and machines that no foe will best him in battle.
    He is my answer to cryptic logic, he is the Defender of my Romulan Crew.
    He is Tovan Khev... and he shall know no fear."
  • smugsuksmugsuk Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    On my feds mostly AP. For my klingons I stick with Disruptors.
  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I'm surprised, shocked nearly, to learn Anti-proton isn't in the lead, by leaps and bounds.

    Keep in mind that many of the high-end playable ships have abilities and available enhancements that are specifically tied to their faction's default energy type. For example, all the new T6 veteran heavy destroyers have Phaser/Disruptor/Plasma Lotus consoles (depending on the faction) which are enhanceable via the appropriate tactical console for that energy type, so it makes the most sense to use all energy weapons of that same type as well.

    Other examples include the Odyssey's Chevron Separation and the Prometheus's Multi-Vector Assault Mode, which create autonomous pets of the separated components of your ship. Being Federation ships, those pets always fire phaser beams - there's no way to configure them to any other energy type - but they, too, are enhanceable via the Phaser Relay tac console. So, again, it makes the most sense to go all phasers with those ships.

    You can use the Vet ships an skip the console for other energy builds. Galaxy-X really only ought to run Phasers.

    Now as for the comment about the Pet ship parts on the MVAE, has their damage actually been shown to be increased by Phaser Energy Consoles?

    If so I will switch my MVAE to Phasers, probably Phased Biomatter.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,489 Arc User
    Where is the option "All of the above"?

    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • denniskr87denniskr87 Member Posts: 58 Arc User
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I'm surprised, shocked nearly, to learn Anti-proton isn't in the lead, by leaps and bounds.
    Look again LOL
  • alexraptorralexraptorr Member Posts: 1,192 Arc User
    Really needs to be a multiple choice poll, I use phasers on all my feds, Disruptors on all my KDF and Romulan Plasma weapons on all my Romulans. :P
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid." - Q
  • shadowwraith77shadowwraith77 Member Posts: 6,395 Arc User
    I am not in control, of the way the polls are designed, they only offer one choice per vote I am afraid!
    tumblr_nq9ec3BSAy1qj6sk2o2_500_zpspkqw0mmk.gif


    Praetor of the -RTS- Romulan Tal Shiar fleet!

  • denniskr87denniskr87 Member Posts: 58 Arc User
    I use polarons on my alt, but they really su**s compared to my antiproton build on my main,and bouth are on XIV UR lvl... On klingon alt i use disruptors,and they are next to antiproton, but antiprotons still cut batter... When you use high Crit rate build, then there is no batter then antiprotons, combine that with pen mod(on crafted weapons), intel boff, and surgical strike, then you only se on demage numbers ;crit,crit,crit,crit... :blush:
  • foolishowlfoolishowl Member Posts: 102 Arc User
    Thanks for the explanations. I feel a bit less like I'm fundamentally misunderstanding how to choose loadouts for my ships.
    And of course, tetryon's proc is no help shooting static unshielded targets in ISA, which is for some reason the standard map for calculating DPS. It's good against ships, not for bombardment.
    That explains a lot. Whenever I do ISA, I figure my main job is to tie up the reinforcements, especially the Nanite Spheres, with grav wells. I seem to do respectable amounts of DPS on Crystal Catastrophe with torpedoes. So the maps chosen clearly make a big difference.
  • hunteralpha84hunteralpha84 Member Posts: 524 Arc User
    Tetryon has 1 vote. That makes me sad.

    Surprised plasmas not higher but I suppose romulan plasma comes under hybrid.
  • This content has been removed.
  • azurealli4nceazurealli4nce Member Posts: 80 Arc User
    I was sick of antiproton before my main's ship fired a single shot with AP. Please balance the damage types.
    DPS-Bronze, DPS-Silver, DPS-Gold, etc. are FAKE! They were created by an outvoted minority who destroyed the original DPS channels!

    Tactical Team sucked, once upon a time. I got it buffed. Don't think for a minute that Cryptic ignores forum feedback.
  • lsegnlsegn Member Posts: 594 Arc User
    I was sick of antiproton before my main's ship fired a single shot with AP. Please balance the damage types.

    *sigh*

    They ARE balanced! It just so happens that as with anything else in the game, some weapons synergise with some builds better than others. Polaron is amazing on Drain builds for example. The only reason Antiproton is so popular is because it synergizes well with high Crit builds which are currently all the rage. It doesn't mean it's the only build worth using its just the easiest. It should be pointed out as well that the difference in DPS made by a single modifier is generally 5% or less, so y'all can all stop your bitching about Antiproton. It's not that much better, the tiny difference only matters to DPS chasers.
  • riccardo171riccardo171 Member Posts: 1,802 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    Idea: remove the CrtD bonus on Antiproton weaponry and give them something proc-based like every other weapon.

    There will be outcry, but less red fawing stuff all around. Perhaps, just perhaps, we might even start to see Federation ships using Phasers, Romulans Plasma or Disruptor and Klingons Disruptor.

    Just maybe. But this won't happen because... well you get the point.

    Ps. I use Phasers.
    PPs. *used
  • rygelx16rygelx16 Member Posts: 161 Arc User
    Antiproton. Not because they are the most powerful, but because they are the cheapest on the exchange.
  • lsegnlsegn Member Posts: 594 Arc User
    Idea: remove the CrtD bonus on Antiproton weaponry and give them something proc-based like every other weapon.

    There will be outcry, but less red fawing stuff all around. Perhaps, just perhaps, we might even start to see Federation ships using Phasers, Romulans Plasma or Disruptor and Klingons Disruptor.

    Just maybe. But this won't happen because... well you get the point.

    Ps. I use Phasers.
    PPs. *used

    THERE IS NOTHING STOPPING YOU FROM USING ANY WEAPON YOU WANT!!!!!

    If people use other weapon types that are non-faction maybe it's just because they want to!?! You know because we can!!!
    I just can't even be bothered to talk to these mouth-breathers anymore...
  • riccardo171riccardo171 Member Posts: 1,802 Arc User
    lsegn wrote: »
    Idea: remove the CrtD bonus on Antiproton weaponry and give them something proc-based like every other weapon.

    There will be outcry, but less red fawing stuff all around. Perhaps, just perhaps, we might even start to see Federation ships using Phasers, Romulans Plasma or Disruptor and Klingons Disruptor.

    Just maybe. But this won't happen because... well you get the point.

    Ps. I use Phasers.
    PPs. *used

    THERE IS NOTHING STOPPING YOU FROM USING ANY WEAPON YOU WANT!!!!!

    If people use other weapon types that are non-faction maybe it's just because they want to!?! You know because we can!!!
    I just can't even be bothered to talk to these mouth-breathers anymore...

    meltdown much? I suppose you didn't even get the implicit message. You should breathe some oxygen before speaking. Or maybe...
  • sovereign47sovereign47 Member Posts: 399 Arc User
    I'm somewhat canon junkie, so I use canon weapons as well.

    Or more precisely, I'm using phasers + photon/quantum torpedoes for my Federation starships, disruptors and photon torps for my Klingon ships, and plasma based weapons for my Romulan vessels. Aside from that, I'm using spiral wave disruptors and quantum/cluster torps on my Galor.
    FED ENG: FA Sirius Verax (USS Leviathan) , FED TAC (Delta): FA Adria Tyllex (USS Thunderblade) , ROM TAC: ADM Kill'ina (IRW Imperix Thrai) , KLING ENG (Delta): LT. GEN Ghol'Vaq Martok (IKS Qeh'Ral II) - 44th Fleet member
    SZ1RgUL.jpg
    SUPPORTING PLAYABLE CARDASSIAN AND DOMINION FACTIONS!
  • sennahcheribsennahcherib Member Posts: 2,823 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    i have 10 characters:

    - 5 - antiproton (soon 6) all dbb
    - 2 - disruptor/elachi disruptor both dbb
    - 1 - polaron dbb
    - 1 - tetryon dbb
    - 1 - plasma (rom plasma) beam arrays

    + 2 alternative builds (polarized disruptor beams, normal disruptor beams)
  • foxrockssocksfoxrockssocks Member Posts: 2,482 Arc User
    I have at least 2 characters using each damage type, one with beams, the other cannons, some use torpedoes some don't. Really the only thing over-represented is the kinetic cutting beam.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • admiraldunwalladmiraldunwall Member Posts: 57 Arc User
    Antiproton and Romulan Plasma, simply due to the fact they are so easy to get in very rare with the mods I like :blush:
    tumblr_n8bewt4QjC1qm2fu4o2_r1_400.gif
    "Polls are so annoying, let's make a poll to see who agrees!"
  • seriousdaveseriousdave Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    Depends on the ship.
    While I use either AP & rom-plas for most there are some ships like the Mat'ha, Faeht, vet destroyers where I use the native energy type to buff the gimick. Stuff like the plasma lotus or the disruptor nose cannon are pretty dang awesome when backed up by 5 tac consoles.
Sign In or Register to comment.