test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Simple Desires

flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
Always a Request Thread appearing every now and again, heck I've made numerous myself, but I think it's time for another one, though one that's more... simplified. No elaboration on the answers, not an opinion on how a particular item should be handled (with stats and such), just a simple case of name and display.

So, what do we all want? Lets take a look;

  • Desired Ship(s):
    • Desired Promotional Ship: Jem'Hadar Battlecruiser (DS9)
    • Desired Lock Box Ship: Son'a Battleship (ST: Insurrection)
    • Desired Lobi Ship: Cooperative Sphere
    • Desired Anniversary Ship: New Orleans Class (ST:TNG)

  • Desired Playable Species (limit of three):
    • Cardassians
    • Xindi
    • Suliban

  • Desired Playable Faction: the Dominion

  • Desired Guest Star (limit of three):
    • Andrew Robinson (Garak)
    • Jeffrey Combs (Weyoun/Shran)
    • Scott Bakula (Jonathan Archer)

  • Desired (featured) Set: Temporal

  • Desired NPC enemies (limit of three):
    • Fen Domar
    • Sheliak
    • Tzenkethi

  • Desired NPC friendlies (limit of three):
    • Vidiian
    • Deltan
    • Son'a (antihero?)

  • Desired Zone Revamp (limit of one): Deep Space Nine

  • Desired Tailor Change: Caitian/Ferasan (bringing them in line with true Felines)


...and I think that's me done. Feel free to use the above titles as a guideline, otherwise add/remove at your desire.

Note: I use the word we as a generalized term for everyone who posts here, I am not suggesting that my above requests are shared, nor would I imply such. I say this only as some posters can get a little ... tender when it is suggested that people are speaking on their behalf and on assumptions. I am not.
attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
Post edited by flash525 on

Comments

  • thegcbaconthegcbacon Member Posts: 434 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    flash525 wrote: »
    Note: I use the word we as a generalized term for everyone who posts here, I am not suggesting that my above requests are shared, nor would I imply such. I say this only as some posters can get a little ... tender when it is suggested that people are speaking on their behalf and on assumptions. I am not.

    Not everyone who posts here wants what you want, so you shouldn't generalize at all. It's what you want, not us.
  • seriousxenoseriousxeno Member Posts: 473 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    This list includes stuff that would have to be licensed but since I want it, I added it anyway:

    Desired Ship(s):
    Desired Promotional Ship: Jem'Hadar Battlecruiser
    Desired Lock Box Ship: Kazon Carrier
    Desired Lobi Ship: Cooperative Sphere
    Desired Anniversary Ship: Voodieh Heavy Battlecruiser


    Desired Playable Species (limit of three):
    Cardassians
    Interstellar Concordium races
    Hydrans (they would make great carriers too!)



    Desired Playable Faction: Interstellar Concordium


    Desired Guest Star (limit of three):
    Rene Auberjonois - Odo
    Nana Visitor - Kira Nerys
    ‎LeVar Burton - Geordie LaForge



    Desired (featured) Set: no idea


    Desired NPC enemies (limit of three):
    The Swarm
    Sheliak
    Mirak Star League


    Desired Zone Revamp (limit of one): Deep Space K7 (I want the TOS style bar!)


    Desired Tailor Change: none really
    latest?cb=20090525051807&path-prefix=en
    "Let them eat static!"
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    thegcbacon wrote: »
    Not everyone who posts here wants what you want, so you shouldn't generalize at all. It's what you want, not us.
    You're exactly the sort of person I mean with reference to my note. I have placed that there to inform everybody that my above desires are my own, and not that of a shared voice. Was there truly any reason for you to make the post you did (except for trolling) when I had clearly already stated this? :rolleyes:
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • nimbullnimbull Member Posts: 1,568 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    I know what I want...

    * Equal representation of end Tier starships across all factions. That means KDF, Fed, and Rom should have equal numbers of escorts, cruisers, and science ships for a given type/tier.

    * Fleet versions of end tier ships implemented in a timely manor.

    I don't think that is too much to ask.
    Green people don't have to be.... little.
  • jermbotjermbot Member Posts: 801 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    Tier 6 variants of my favorite lockbox ships that come with costume options that include the appearance of the tier 5 version.

    A playable Cardassian faction.

    A two-handed sword with appropriate combat depth and animations.

    A Weyoun guest spot.

    A mission involving rampaging androids.
  • nimbullnimbull Member Posts: 1,568 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    jermbot wrote: »
    Tier 6 variants of my favorite lockbox ships that come with costume options that include the appearance of the tier 5 version.

    A playable Cardassian faction.

    A two-handed sword with appropriate combat depth and animations.

    A Weyoun guest spot.

    A mission involving rampaging androids.

    Do you really believe they'd do the Cardassian's justice given how they've neglected the KDF and Romulans in terms of development effort for ships and things?
    Green people don't have to be.... little.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    nimbull wrote: »
    Do you really believe they'd do the Cardassian's justice given how they've neglected the KDF and Romulans in terms of development effort for ships and things?
    Whilst I'm sure you mean well, please don't let this turn into another faction debate. :(
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • nimbullnimbull Member Posts: 1,568 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    flash525 wrote: »
    Whilst I'm sure you mean well, please don't let this turn into another faction debate. :(

    I'm not trying to turn it in to a debate, I'm just being practical based on past development performance by Cryptic.
    Green people don't have to be.... little.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    nimbull wrote: »
    I'm not trying to turn it in to a debate, I'm just being practical based on past development performance by Cryptic.
    I suspected that, and I'm sure you knew that, and I think we both know that if Cryptic released a Cardassian faction, they'd ruin it as they have done the KDF and more lately, the Republic, but asking the question (as innocently as it was) will stir up that daunting debate one way or the other.

    ...so much so that we're already debating it. :eek: :P
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • nimbullnimbull Member Posts: 1,568 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    flash525 wrote: »
    I suspected that, and I'm sure you knew that, and I think we both know that if Cryptic released a Cardassian faction, they'd ruin it as they have done the KDF and more lately, the Republic, but asking the question (as innocently as it was) will stir up that daunting debate one way or the other.

    ...so much so that we're already debating it. :eek: :P

    I just don't want to see Cryptic pull another flash pan faction. Come out strong with the Cardassians and then let them float in the wind for development effort like they did the Romulans. It seems like Cryptic already bit off more then it can properly chew with the existing factions already in game.
    Green people don't have to be.... little.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    nimbull wrote: »
    I just don't want to see Cryptic pull another flash pan faction. Come out strong with the Cardassians and then let them float in the wind for development effort like they did the Romulans. It seems like Cryptic already bit off more then it can properly chew with the existing factions already in game.
    I agree with you. :)

    That having been said, anything else you'd like to see? :cool:
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
Sign In or Register to comment.