I was wondering, why does not exist any Defiant ship pack. I think i would be just time to add to STO a T6 Definat. Why??!!!! This ship has a real history In Star Trek Univers and it would be a great mistake to let this class just hange around on T5-U.Simply this ship is the only reason why really like to play with Star Trek online, but it's shortly out of date.No special brige slots,abilities etc.It's also frustraiting that a 200 years older Kumari is 2times stronger then one of the most feared warship of 23-24 century.And why....well the answer quit simple KUMARI SHIP PACK!!!! This fact freaks me allways out if i see one of them.It doesn't matter how many u grind, how hard U try to make a proper DPS ship...pfff press the button kumari fly boy and the STF is done.No battlecloak just a simple one, that cloak system was from the romulans so its should be a battlecloak not just that nerfed primitive version of it.Quad Cannons like them should be added to the game as special productable class weapon. 5 weapons fron 2 aft would be also nicer than the 4/3 version or atleast as much Boff stations as the Kumari has.I'm sick of this pay to win marketing oriented politic witch rules in STO and allows a 200 years old bird to be top DPS dealer.DR ships are simply ugly exept one or 2 romulan warbird. Commandships...out the line, nothing new really at FEDs,Klingons dosn't even deserve to mention them at all. /fire the guy who designed them, worst content of ever/
Phantom =T6 defiant, integrated cloak no more console, phaser lance console, best starship trait reprocity, access to intel abilities like Override subsystem safeties and surgical strikes which are amazing. You want a T6 defiant, there it is. It's an amazing ship and its on sale.
Now... if they offered the Defiant skins on the Phantom? Much win. They don't even have to mix with the Phantom visuals. Just make it a drop-box choice and then you can mix/match the parts from that choice.
They can even just add the skin option if you purchased the Defiant Retrofit. It would make sense, and I'd love such change. I hate the Phantom's aesthetics.
They can even just add the skin option if you purchased the Defiant Retrofit. It would make sense, and I'd love such change. I hate the Phantom's aesthetics.
Phantom =T6 defiant, integrated cloak no more console, phaser lance console, best starship trait reprocity, access to intel abilities like Override subsystem safeties and surgical strikes which are amazing. You want a T6 defiant, there it is. It's an amazing ship and its on sale.
Except it looks like it was designed by a 3 year old.
No battlecloak just a simple one, that cloak system was from the romulans so its should be a battlecloak not just that nerfed primitive version of it.
Only the original U.S.S. Defiant had a Romulan cloaking device and even that was a loaner. There's no reason for the Defiant-class as a whole line to have Romulan cloaks. :cool:
After only 4 months, 19 weeks, 134 days, it's here. It's real! U.S.S. Tempest
They can even just add the skin option if you purchased the Defiant Retrofit. It would make sense, and I'd love such change. I hate the Phantom's aesthetics.
YES! It's just not. It's like saying the new Command Battlecruisers are Excelsior-class vessels, or the Guardian is the Galaxy-class. THEY ARE NOT. The Phantom has a few visual cues from the Defiant, and it has the integrated cloak... but, day-um, it's like twice the size of the Defiant! IT'S NOT THE SAME SHIP! :mad:
The Pathfinder opened the door for us to get select canon ships at T6 level. My guess is that the Galaxy and Defiant would get the nod next.
Now, let's quit this silly "Phantom-as-Defiant" talk before we TRIBBLE off The Sisko... :P
Comments
Now... if they offered the Defiant skins on the Phantom? Much win. They don't even have to mix with the Phantom visuals. Just make it a drop-box choice and then you can mix/match the parts from that choice.
But it will never be a Defiant.
They can even just add the skin option if you purchased the Defiant Retrofit. It would make sense, and I'd love such change. I hate the Phantom's aesthetics.
This! ALL of this!
These Are The Voyages...
Except it looks like it was designed by a 3 year old.
Only the original U.S.S. Defiant had a Romulan cloaking device and even that was a loaner. There's no reason for the Defiant-class as a whole line to have Romulan cloaks. :cool:
U.S.S. Tempest
YES! It's just not. It's like saying the new Command Battlecruisers are Excelsior-class vessels, or the Guardian is the Galaxy-class. THEY ARE NOT. The Phantom has a few visual cues from the Defiant, and it has the integrated cloak... but, day-um, it's like twice the size of the Defiant! IT'S NOT THE SAME SHIP! :mad:
The Pathfinder opened the door for us to get select canon ships at T6 level. My guess is that the Galaxy and Defiant would get the nod next.
Now, let's quit this silly "Phantom-as-Defiant" talk before we TRIBBLE off The Sisko... :P
My Ship Builds: USS Conqueror, HMS Victorious, HMS Concord, ISS Queen Elizabeth, Black Widow III
Click here to view my DeviantArt.