THe WEapons efficiency and Turnrate Cruiser commands have been replaced by a 4 piece console Set? Seriously?
Even the Avenger, as a battlecruiser has at least the Weapons Efficiency command. Thats something thad should be added to the Command cruisers. I don´t want to rely on the4-piece console set for my weapons energy to be at max and limit all my other console combinations in return.
THe Cruiser commands have been added for Cruisers and for a purpose. I don´t need the shield freq. modulation, the Shields are already strong.
I hope that will be revisited and the other commands added in the future. And i won´t miss the "Attrect Fire" command
THe WEapons efficiency and Turnrate Cruiser commands have been replaced by a 4 piece console Set? Seriously?
I hope that will be revisited and the other commands added in the future. And i won´t miss the "Attrect Fire" command
Your loss on the Attract Fire. Besides, they're basically Flight-deck cruisers; shield frequency, attract fire, and one hangar bay. It's not suprising.
SCM - Crystal C. (S) - [00:12] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 8.63M(713.16K) - Fed Sci
It is only the devs that have made dps the sole gaming (in pve anyways) aspect in STO, so like every ship in the game, they have to produce a certain amount of dps to matter.
They more than make up enough for this task, even in their gimped states...
I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
Your loss on the Attract Fire. Besides, they're basically Flight-deck cruisers; shield frequency, attract fire, and one hangar bay. It's not suprising.
Why would i need more threat creation?
And i realy couldn´t care less if its a cruiser, Battlecruiser or Flight deck cruiser.
Even if they named it that way it wouldn´t matter.
if they had made it an Escort it would be fine but Cruisers should have the important cruiser commands. All of them. Sci ships have their sensor analysis, Escorts their basit extra weapons power+ turn.
Why cruiser commands if there are so many exception. For example, if there is one cruiser that does not need the weapons efficiency command its the Assault cruiser, but it has it.
Comments
Your loss on the Attract Fire. Besides, they're basically Flight-deck cruisers; shield frequency, attract fire, and one hangar bay. It's not suprising.
SCM - Hive (S) - [02:31] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 30.62M(204.66K) - Fed Sci
Tacs are overrated.
Game's best wiki
Build questions? Look here!
It is only the devs that have made dps the sole gaming (in pve anyways) aspect in STO, so like every ship in the game, they have to produce a certain amount of dps to matter.
They more than make up enough for this task, even in their gimped states...
Why would i need more threat creation?
And i realy couldn´t care less if its a cruiser, Battlecruiser or Flight deck cruiser.
Even if they named it that way it wouldn´t matter.
if they had made it an Escort it would be fine but Cruisers should have the important cruiser commands. All of them. Sci ships have their sensor analysis, Escorts their basit extra weapons power+ turn.
Why cruiser commands if there are so many exception. For example, if there is one cruiser that does not need the weapons efficiency command its the Assault cruiser, but it has it.