test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Command Cruisers are missing Cruiser Commands? Is that a joke?

willamsheridanwillamsheridan Member Posts: 1,189 Arc User
THe WEapons efficiency and Turnrate Cruiser commands have been replaced by a 4 piece console Set? Seriously?

Even the Avenger, as a battlecruiser has at least the Weapons Efficiency command. Thats something thad should be added to the Command cruisers. I don´t want to rely on the4-piece console set for my weapons energy to be at max and limit all my other console combinations in return.

THe Cruiser commands have been added for Cruisers and for a purpose. I don´t need the shield freq. modulation, the Shields are already strong.

I hope that will be revisited and the other commands added in the future. And i won´t miss the "Attrect Fire" command
Post edited by willamsheridan on

Comments

  • edited February 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • jarvisandalfredjarvisandalfred Member Posts: 1,549 Bug Hunter
    edited February 2015
    THe WEapons efficiency and Turnrate Cruiser commands have been replaced by a 4 piece console Set? Seriously?

    I hope that will be revisited and the other commands added in the future. And i won´t miss the "Attrect Fire" command

    Your loss on the Attract Fire. Besides, they're basically Flight-deck cruisers; shield frequency, attract fire, and one hangar bay. It's not suprising.
    SCM - Crystal C. (S) - [00:12] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 8.63M(713.16K) - Fed Sci

    SCM - Hive (S) - [02:31] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 30.62M(204.66K) - Fed Sci

    Tacs are overrated.

    Game's best wiki

    Build questions? Look here!
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    They are meant to be support ships and/or tank.

    It is only the devs that have made dps the sole gaming (in pve anyways) aspect in STO, so like every ship in the game, they have to produce a certain amount of dps to matter.

    They more than make up enough for this task, even in their gimped states...
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Fed players wanted FDCs, well, now you have em, and anything that goes along with them.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • willamsheridanwillamsheridan Member Posts: 1,189 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Your loss on the Attract Fire. Besides, they're basically Flight-deck cruisers; shield frequency, attract fire, and one hangar bay. It's not suprising.

    Why would i need more threat creation?

    And i realy couldn´t care less if its a cruiser, Battlecruiser or Flight deck cruiser.

    Even if they named it that way it wouldn´t matter.

    if they had made it an Escort it would be fine but Cruisers should have the important cruiser commands. All of them. Sci ships have their sensor analysis, Escorts their basit extra weapons power+ turn.

    Why cruiser commands if there are so many exception. For example, if there is one cruiser that does not need the weapons efficiency command its the Assault cruiser, but it has it.
  • szerontzurszerontzur Member Posts: 2,724 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    They're Flight-Deck Cruisers that can mount Dual Cannons.. they kind of break a lot of the molds.
Sign In or Register to comment.