I don't know what you guys did, but ever since yesterday's update my game has been lagging to the point of utter uselessness, even a complete reinstall of 10GB worth of data has done nothing to resolve the problem.
Already did a speed test, results are here:
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3891433812
Tracert:
Tracing route to patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 2 ms 2 ms 5 ms BTHUB4 [192.168.x.TRIBBLE]
2 71 ms 57 ms 59 ms 217.41.165.186
3 25 ms 24 ms 24 ms 217.41.165.193
4 32 ms 25 ms 25 ms 213.1.69.198
5 * * 28 ms 213.120.162.69
6 83 ms 93 ms 62 ms 31.55.165.109
7 28 ms 31 ms 27 ms acc2.10GigE-7-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.20.224]
8 40 ms 43 ms 46 ms core1-te0-13-0-15.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.164]
9 62 ms 62 ms 68 ms peer3-te0-3-0-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.102.9]
10 33 ms 34 ms 35 ms 166-49-211-244.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.244]
11 34 ms 34 ms 34 ms be3035.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.4.169]
12 37 ms 36 ms 40 ms be2398.ccr22.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.210]
13 34 ms 34 ms 44 ms be2494.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.3.130]
14 115 ms 115 ms 116 ms be2493.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.4.97]
15 113 ms 112 ms 112 ms te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.24]
16 128 ms 137 ms 137 ms 38.111.40.114
17 116 ms 143 ms 125 ms patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
Nettest:
contacting nettest server..
Local IP: 81.135.68.196
Ping: 115.4 msec
Port: 80: 418 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 442 KB/sec 500
Port: 80: 422 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 446 KB/sec 500
Port: 443: 400 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 424 KB/sec 500
Port: 443: 412 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 436 KB/sec 500
Port: 7255: 422 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 447 KB/sec 500
Port: 7255: 415 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 439 KB/sec 500
Port: 7003: 398 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 421 KB/sec 500
Port: 7003: 417 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 441 KB/sec 500
Port: 7202: 407 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 430 KB/sec 500
Port: 7202: 414 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 438 KB/sec 500
Port: 7499: timed out
Port: 7499: 252 KB/sec 21 KB/sec 692 KB/sec 500
Port: 80: 172 KB/sec 19 KB/sec 804 KB/sec 500
Idle NIC bandwidth Send: 16 KB/sec Recv: 817 KB/sec
hit return to exit
Comments
Traccia instradamento verso patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
su un massimo di 30 punti di passaggio:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 24 ms 25 ms 33 ms 10.20.224.1
3 26 ms 25 ms 25 ms 10.7.104.206
4 30 ms 30 ms 31 ms 10.250.18.24
5 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 10.250.19.1
6 25 ms 25 ms 24 ms 10.247.126.129
7 36 ms 37 ms 37 ms 10.250.23.186
8 42 ms 41 ms 41 ms 10.7.8.149
9 42 ms 41 ms 41 ms 10.7.0.13
10 47 ms 46 ms 46 ms 10.254.2.209
11 57 ms 54 ms 58 ms 10.254.0.125
12 56 ms 58 ms 57 ms 10.254.12.21
13 162 ms 63 ms 57 ms 10.254.12.6
14 67 ms 71 ms 68 ms 89.97.200.186
15 67 ms 74 ms 70 ms 89.97.200.254
16 77 ms 72 ms 76 ms 89.96.200.18
17 120 ms 115 ms 120 ms te0-6-0-2.rcr21.mil01.atlas.cogentco.com [149.6.152.209]
18 119 ms 121 ms 118 ms be2043.ccr21.zrh01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.38.101]
19 119 ms 119 ms 115 ms be2023.ccr21.muc01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0.249]
20 131 ms 133 ms 130 ms be2228.ccr41.fra03.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.38.49]
21 133 ms 132 ms 134 ms be2261.ccr41.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.37.29]
22 146 ms 152 ms 151 ms be2182.ccr21.lpl01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.77.246]
23 218 ms 220 ms 221 ms be2386.ccr21.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.44.161]
24 215 ms 210 ms 228 ms te4-4.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.42]
25 223 ms 214 ms 218 ms 38.111.40.114
26 218 ms 218 ms 223 ms patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Traccia completata.
Playing STO spamming FAW is like playing chess using always the computer's suggested moves
Though in reality, the Speed Test connects to a diagnostic Server that has nothing to do with the network where the STO Servers are located, which makes the results invalid for solving your problem...
'Net Test' is much more useful, as the diagnostic Server it uses is located on the same network as the STO Servers... The inconsistent sustained throughput results of 'Net Test' shows that you can't maintain a reliable network connection quality to the network where the STO Servers are located. And since the 'Net Test' uses a simple diagnostic server, (so the STO Servers are out of the picture with the Net Test results) this shows that the problem is a connection quality issue and not a STO Server issue...
The 'Trace Route' isn't showing anything particularly bad, as far as network latency is concerned. But network latency isn't everything needed to maintain a quality connection, and there's probably some other issue present that 'Trace Route' won't pick up...
Now what we really need here are the 'Path Ping' diagnostic results, as this will provided a more detailed result on connection quality issue on the path your ISP is using to reach the STO Servers...
Tracing route to patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
0 Steve-PC.home [192.168.x.TRIBBLE]
1 BTHUB4 [192.168.x.TRIBBLE]
2 217.41.165.186
3 217.41.165.193
4 213.1.69.198
5 213.120.162.69
6 31.55.165.109
7 acc2.10GigE-7-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.250.224]
8 core1-te0-13-0-15.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.164]
9 peer3-te0-3-0-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.102.9]
10 166-49-211-244.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.244]
11 be3035.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.14.169]
12 be2398.ccr22.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.51.210]
13 be2494.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.39.130]
14 be2493.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.42.97]
15 te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.254]
16 38.111.40.114
17 patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Computing statistics for 425 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 Steve-PC.home [192.168.x.TRIBBLE] 0/ 100 = 0% |
1 4ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% BTHUB4 [192.168.x.TRIBBLE] 0/ 100 = 0% |
2 29ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 217.41.165.186 0/ 100 = 0% |
3 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 217.41.165.193 0/ 100 = 0% |
4 31ms 38/ 100 = 38% 38/ 100 = 38% 213.1.69.198 0/ 100 = 0% |
5 29ms 32/ 100 = 32% 32/ 100 = 32% 213.120.162.69 0/ 100 = 0% |
6 28ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 31.55.165.109 0/ 100 = 0% |
7 34ms 20/ 100 = 20% 20/ 100 = 20% acc2.10GigE-7-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.250.224] 0/ 100 = 0% |
8 43ms 21/ 100 = 21% 21/ 100 = 21% core1-te0-13-0-15.ilford.ukcore.bt
.net [109.159.250.164] 0/ 100 = 0% |
9 35ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% peer3-te0-3-0-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.102.9] 0/ 100 = 0% |
10 37ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 166-49-211-244.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.244] 0/ 100 = 0% |
11 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be3035.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.14.169] 0/ 100 = 0% |
12 42ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be2398.ccr22.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.51.210] 0/ 100 = 0% |
13 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be2494.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.
com [154.54.39.130] 0/ 100 = 0% |
14 121ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be2493.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.
com [154.54.42.97] 0/ 100 = 0% |
15 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.c
om [66.28.4.254] 0/ 100 = 0% |
16 130ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 38.111.40.114 0/ 100 = 0% |
17 126ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
I'm gonna have to do some serious reading up in order to make heads or tails of this!
I've been having some serious issues that last little while, and running the trace and net test today, has revealed this.
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Gene CO>tracert patchserver.crypticstudios.com
Tracing route to patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms TRIBBLE.TRIBBLE.TRIBBLE.TRIBBLE
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 8 ms 10 ms 11 ms 69.63.254.73
4 13 ms 10 ms 10 ms 69.63.251.41
5 15 ms 15 ms 16 ms 69.63.251.45
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 29 ms 29 ms 28 ms be3056.ccr21.jfk05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.13
.33]
8 29 ms 28 ms 27 ms be2063.mpd22.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.47
.57]
9 34 ms 33 ms 33 ms be2097.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.30
.118]
10 34 ms 34 ms 33 ms te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.25
4]
11 46 ms 34 ms 35 ms 38.111.40.114
12 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
And the net test shows this.
contacting nettest server..
Local IP: 99.251.112.217
Ping: 34.5 msec
Port: 80: 913 KB/sec 22 KB/sec 963 KB/sec 500
Port: 80: 819 KB/sec 20 KB/sec 863 KB/sec 500
Port: 443: 755 KB/sec 19 KB/sec 796 KB/sec 500
Port: 443:
At which time it hangs indefinitely.
running Pingplotter to the patchserver also shows me an unresponsive router at the hop 2, with 100% packet loss. Hop 6, 69.63.248.89, also goes from being perfectly fine, to unresponsive with 100% packet loss.
I've already had rogers cable come out and install a new line to my apartment yesterday, So I'm not sure what exactly is going on.
Now this explains why you have connection quality issues to the STO Servers. To have a reliable TCP/IP connection you should be having ZERO PACKET LOSS for the connection and you have...
Now a 100% loss could be caused the node configuration not supporting the protocol that 'Path Ping' uses, but values that are not 100% are real. And any measurable packet loss will cause issues with time synced networked applications, such as the STO Client...
Dropped Packets (which are either lost or thrown away by the network) starts at Hop #3, which appears to be in the domain of your ISP. Sounds like you need to contact your ISP technical support and have them look into a dropped packet issue occurring in their networks...
Tracing route to patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
0 Steve-PC.home [192.168.x.TRIBBLE]
1 BTHUB4 [192.168.1.254]
2 217.41.165.186
3 217.41.165.193
4 213.1.69.198
5 213.120.162.69
6 31.55.165.109
7 acc2.10GigE-7-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.250.224]
8 * core1-te0-13-0-15.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.164]
9 peer3-te0-3-0-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.102.9]
10 166-49-211-244.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.244]
11 be3035.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.14.169]
12 be2398.ccr22.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.51.210]
13 be2494.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.39.130]
14 be2493.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.42.97]
15 te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.254]
16 38.111.40.114
17 patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Computing statistics for 425 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 Steve-PC.home [192.168.1.213] 0/ 100 = 0% |
1 3ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% BTHUB4 [192.168.x.TRIBBLE] 0/ 100 = 0% |
2 29ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 217.41.165.186 0/ 100 = 0% |
3 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 217.41.165.193 0/ 100 = 0% |
4 29ms 38/ 100 = 38% 38/ 100 = 38% 213.1.69.198 0/ 100 = 0% |
5 30ms 37/ 100 = 37% 37/ 100 = 37% 213.120.162.69 0/ 100 = 0% |
6 27ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 31.55.165.109 0/ 100 = 0% |
7 32ms 33/ 100 = 33% 33/ 100 = 33% acc2.10GigE-7-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.250.224] 0/ 100 = 0% |
8 42ms 34/ 100 = 34% 34/ 100 = 34% core1-te0-13-0-15.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.164] 0/ 100 = 0% |
9 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% peer3-te0-3-0-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.102.9] 0/ 100 = 0% |
10 37ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 166-49-211-244.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.244] 0/ 100 = 0% |
11 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be3035.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.14.169] 0/ 100 = 0% |
12 44ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be2398.ccr22.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.51.210] 0/ 100 = 0% |
13 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be2494.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.39.130] 0/ 100 = 0% |
14 123ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be2493.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.42.97] 0/ 100 = 0% |
15 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.254] 0/ 100 = 0% |
16 132ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 38.111.40.114 0/ 100 = 0% |
17 124ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
Seems there's losses at several points in the chain.
I noticed my client was going up and down, it was doing the same thing yesterday. Glad it's not just mine
To quote Howard from the Big Bang Theory:
"(Pushing button on elevator) Nah, that baby's broken"
tracert patchserver.crypticstudios.com
Mine isn't showing up any anomalies even though the STO server is down.
2 7 ms 7 ms 5 ms 10.104.106.145
3 6 ms 7 ms 8 ms dtr01yakmwa-tge-0-1-0-15.yakm.wa.charter.com [96.34.106.112]
4 8 ms 15 ms 12 ms bbr01yakmwa-bue-1.yakm.wa.charter.com [96.34.105.230]
5 38 ms 31 ms 32 ms bbr02snjsca-bue-3.snjs.ca.charter.com [96.34.2.148]
6 31 ms 33 ms 31 ms te0-4-0-8.ccr21.sjc03.atlas.cogentco.com [38.104.138.157]
7 30 ms 31 ms 31 ms be2000.ccr21.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.6.105]
8 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms be2164.ccr21.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.28.33]
9 66 ms 65 ms 67 ms be2132.ccr21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.30.54]
10 72 ms 72 ms 73 ms be2156.ccr41.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.6.86]
11 99 ms 97 ms 96 ms be2137.ccr21.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.43.194]
12 95 ms 95 ms 96 ms te3-4.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.46.134]
13 100 ms 110 ms 104 ms 38.111.40.114
14 98 ms 96 ms 95 ms patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Tracing route to patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms BTHUB4 [192.168.x.TRIBBLE]
2 24 ms 25 ms 24 ms 217.41.165.186
3 25 ms 24 ms 25 ms 217.41.165.193
4 33 ms 28 ms * 213.1.69.198
5 28 ms 27 ms 27 ms 213.120.162.69
6 25 ms 26 ms 26 ms 31.55.165.109
7 28 ms * * acc2.10GigE-7-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.250.224]
8 37 ms 34 ms 34 ms core1-te0-13-0-15.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.164]
9 33 ms 33 ms 32 ms peer3-te0-3-0-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.102.9]
10 35 ms 31 ms 31 ms 166-49-211-244.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.244]
11 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms be3035.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.14.169]
12 37 ms 37 ms 38 ms be2398.ccr22.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.51.210]
13 34 ms 34 ms 34 ms be2494.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.39.130]
14 116 ms 116 ms 112 ms be2493.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.42.97]
15 117 ms 113 ms 112 ms te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.254]
16 135 ms 135 ms 137 ms 38.111.40.114
17 126 ms 124 ms 138 ms patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
Very true.
The third --- 208.95.185.225. comes after this one --216.52.61.78/perfectworldent-4border 11.bsn.pnap.net is showing package loss as well, but still able to show its address.
It is a bad day being a server, somewhere.
7 28 ms * * acc2.10GigE-7-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.250.224]
This should not be there. This usually means something is not routing properly through the ISP.
Tracing route to patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 8 ms 9 ms 22 ms 10.110.227.129
3 15 ms 11 ms 11 ms van58-6-240-93.dynamic.rogerstelecom.net [209.148.240.93]
4 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 69.63.253.194
5 10 ms 11 ms 14 ms be4066.ccr22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com [38.122.69.117]
6 19 ms 19 ms 20 ms be2437.ccr22.alb02.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.197]
7 24 ms 25 ms 26 ms be2302.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.43.13]
8 23 ms 23 ms 24 ms te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.254]
9 26 ms 36 ms 35 ms 38.111.40.114
10 23 ms 23 ms 25 ms patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
And pingpath.
Tracing route to patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
0 Hitokiri-DT [192.168.1.100]
1 192.168.1.1
2 10.110.227.129
3 van58-6-240-93.dynamic.rogerstelecom.net [209.148.240.93]
4 69.63.253.194
5 be4066.ccr22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com [38.122.69.117]
6 be2437.ccr22.alb02.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.197]
7 be2302.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.43.13]
8 te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.254]
9 38.111.40.114
10 patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Computing statistics for 250 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 Hitokiri-DT [192.168.1.100]
0/ 100 = 0% |
1 1ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 192.168.1.1
0/ 100 = 0% |
2 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 10.110.227.129
0/ 100 = 0% |
3 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% van58-6-240-93.dynamic.rogerstelecom.net [209.148.240.93]
0/ 100 = 0% |
4 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 69.63.253.194
0/ 100 = 0% |
5 12ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be4066.ccr22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com [38.122.69.117]
0/ 100 = 0% |
6 20ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be2437.ccr22.alb02.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.197]
0/ 100 = 0% |
7 25ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% be2302.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.43.13]
0/ 100 = 0% |
8 54ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.254]
0/ 100 = 0% |
9 30ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 38.111.40.114
0/ 100 = 0% |
10 23ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.3.9600]
(c) 2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Windows\system32>tracert patchserver.crypticstudios.com
Tracing route to patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 17 ms 14 ms 14 ms te-0-1-0-2-sur01.springfield.ma.boston.comcast.n
et [68.87.158.185]
4 17 ms 19 ms 17 ms be-49-ar01.needham.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.85.
69.13]
5 24 ms 24 ms 22 ms he-2-5-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net [68
.86.94.201]
6 23 ms 24 ms 22 ms te-0-1-0-2-pe04.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68
.86.84.242]
7 24 ms 23 ms 22 ms be7922.ccr21.jfk10.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.13
.161]
8 22 ms 21 ms 23 ms be2057.ccr22.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.80
.177]
9 29 ms 28 ms 29 ms be2096.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.30
.42]
10 130 ms 204 ms 211 ms te4-2.ccr01.bos06.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.25
4]
11 47 ms 34 ms 52 ms 38.111.40.114
12 34 ms 32 ms 32 ms patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
C:\Windows\system32>
Very Frustrating. I reinstalled the game as well. Still nothing!
same problem here, very laggy. Im from Bucharest and made those 2 tests:
Tracing route to patchserver.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 [192.168.1.1]
2 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms 10.0.x.x [10.0.x.x]
3 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 10.30.x.x [10.30.x.x]
4 4 ms 2 ms 2 ms cr01.bucuresti.rdsnet.ro [213.154.128.59]
5 34 ms 33 ms 35 ms xr01.frankfurt.rdsnet.ro [213.154.125.41]
6 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms ge-3-0.ir1.frankfurt-he.de.xo.net [80.81.192.182
]
7 52 ms 90 ms 51 ms 207.88.15.77.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.15.77]
8 129 ms 132 ms 131 ms vb1042.rar3.nyc-ny.us.xo.net [207.88.13.202]
9 135 ms 135 ms 132 ms ae0d0.mcr1.cambridge-ma.us.xo.net [216.156.0.26]
10 136 ms 136 ms 134 ms ae1d0.mcr2.cambridge-ma.us.xo.net [216.156.1.14]
11 123 ms 123 ms 121 ms 209.117.103.10
12 125 ms 124 ms 123 ms border11.te8-1-bbnet2.bsn.pnap.net [63.251.128.1
04]
13 138 ms 126 ms 125 ms perfectworldent-4.border11.bsn.pnap.net [216.52.
61.78]
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 120 ms 121 ms 121 ms patchserver2.crypticstudios.com [208.95.185.41]
Trace complete.
and the second one:
contacting nettest server..
Local IP: 188.27.122.11
Ping: 143.0 msec
Port: 80: 284 KB/sec 9 KB/sec 299 KB/sec 500
Port: 80: 252 KB/sec 8 KB/sec 264 KB/sec 500
Port: 443: 379 KB/sec 11 KB/sec 398 KB/sec 500
Port: 443: 294 KB/sec 9 KB/sec 308 KB/sec 500
Port: 7255: 501 KB/sec 14 KB/sec 526 KB/sec 500
Port: 7255: 491 KB/sec 15 KB/sec 517 KB/sec 500
Port: 7003: 428 KB/sec 10 KB/sec 449 KB/sec 500
Port: 7003: 325 KB/sec 8 KB/sec 341 KB/sec 500
Port: 7202: 460 KB/sec 14 KB/sec 483 KB/sec 500
Port: 7202: 382 KB/sec 10 KB/sec 401 KB/sec 500
Port: 7499: 448 KB/sec 14 KB/sec 471 KB/sec 500
Port: 7499: 311 KB/sec 9 KB/sec 326 KB/sec 500
Port: 80: 408 KB/sec 13 KB/sec 428 KB/sec 500
Idle NIC bandwidth Send: 0 KB/sec Recv: 0 KB/sec
hit return to exit
From what I understand ( 14 * * * Request timed out.) the problem is with your ISP Cryptic, the ethernet seems to be really bad in the US. The game started to be so laggy since DR came up.
I do have a FiberLink Gb connection, a very good one, tested in other games with no problems.
Pls fix these problems, sometimes the game is unplayable for me.
Thank you.
Hop #14 may be a problem, but the sudden increase in network latency between #7 & #8 also looks suspicious... The 'Net Test' results do show a connection quality issue of some kind, but other then #14 not responding (which could be caused by its network configuration), the latency values aren't bad.
Whats really needs to be seen is the 'Path Ping' results, to look for issues that won't be noticed by a 'Trace Route' test...