test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

So riddle me this players

124»

Comments

  • bluegeekbluegeek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    fenr00k wrote: »
    Cryptic CAN made difficult content, sadly though actions would suggest that their data then tells them that most players don't actually want difficult content, they just want to feel awesome.

    Guilty as charged :D

    Well, not really. But I dislike kabooming and do like feeling awesome, so it stands to reason that I'm not going out of my way to make it harder than it has to be.

    Not that I build to do anything except please myself. Don't min-max. Don't run Elites on Elite difficulty. Don't PvP. Do load up on gimmick consoles 'cause I likes tricksy things, my precious...

    Yeah, I figure the odds are high that I will both upgrade some ships to 5U and buy one or more T6's if I like them enough. Not really because I need to.
    My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. You can file a "forums and website" support ticket here
    Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Well, you must not have seen my posts then. Cause I figured Cryptic/PWE for the money grubbing blankedy blanks to do exactly what they are doing. Just look at their history of player-TRIBBLE moves and there should be no shock. Sure, they occasionally give away something for free (after sales of X drops to zero) but overall they have no respect for the players. And most players act like a beaten housewife and keep taking the abuse and keep giving Cryptic money.
    True I probably missed it.
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    We KNEW the T6 was going to be stronger. They SAID SO FROM THE START. So stop playing the I knew it all along BS. We ALL knew it, unless your a bleeding moron. The question was HOW MUCH. And honestly, what they proposed isn't bad at all...I'd be happier if they added a boff station with that console slot, but not bad at all.

    And about a week ago or so I literally said "the tier 5 upgrade will be some hull and maybe a console."

    Guess what? I was pretty much RIGHT. So everybody is all up in arms because the upgrade isn't exactly what a tier 6 is or even close which if you listened to the devs, they said this would be so.

    The fact that everybody is shocked it's like this does actually make them bleeding morons as you say. Hell I'm shocked they are giving 4 out of 5 mastery levels.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • lordmalak1lordmalak1 Member Posts: 4,681 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    talonxv wrote: »
    STB guys I fly with all the time just did Star Base 24 on elite with tier 2s, and another with tier 1s! Had fun doing it too!

    O' GOD I miss those days. Now days people barely get thru them with fleet and lockbox ships. You should see the venom when I show in an ESTF with a T3 ship.
    KBF Lord MalaK
    Awoken Dead
    giphy.gif

    Now shaddup about the queues, it's a BUG
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    lordmalak1 wrote: »
    O' GOD I miss those days. Now days people barely get thru them with fleet and lockbox ships. You should see the venom when I show in an ESTF with a T3 ship.

    STB on Starbase 24 is a pretty smoothly run operation. And the numerous times I ran it with them, it was such a fun TREK RP experience too.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ceekayzeroceekayzero Member Posts: 411 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    corelogik wrote: »
    I just don't grasp why people think their entitled to an upgrade at all let alone a free one, when no other tier level of ship has ever been able to be upgraded to anything more than it was when you bought it.

    I guess the first mistake a lot of these people are making is viewing anything in those or any other game as an "investment". It is so not an investment. Any money you have, do or will spend on this or any other game is a short term expenditure for entertainment. New entertainment will come out at intervals and you will have to pay for that. Way the world works, save your self some grief, get used to it.


    I think the EP disagrees with you:

    We do not want players to feel that their investment in the current ships is devalued by the expansion, and this is a very challenging thing to do for a game with four years of history since the last level cap increase.

    Like it or not, Cryptic has now officially told us that Lockbox/Lobi ship (and to a lesser extent, fleet and C-Store ships) are "investments", and I think looking at it that way, the forum rage about the cost is understandable. I think there's a good argument that you should be right and these ships should *not* be considered investments, but that's not how Cryptic or the game economy developed. Therefore, here we are.

    To me, what the T5-U versus T6 debate comes down to is whether or not a single BOFF power is worth more than a console slot. As we don't currently know how either will be implemented, there's a chance that some T5-U ships will be stronger and more competitive than a T6 ship, at least at first.
  • fenr00kfenr00k Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    bluegeek wrote: »
    Guilty as charged :D

    Well, not really. But I dislike kabooming and do like feeling awesome, so it stands to reason that I'm not going out of my way to make it harder than it has to be.

    Not that I build to do anything except please myself. Don't min-max. Don't run Elites on Elite difficulty. Don't PvP. Do load up on gimmick consoles 'cause I likes tricksy things, my precious...

    Yeah, I figure the odds are high that I will both upgrade some ships to 5U and buy one or more T6's if I like them enough. Not really because I need to.

    There's absolutely NOTHING wrong with that bud, in fact 80-90% of the time I feel the same way. I play just for kicks, and sure love to feel awesomely powerful (hence I love my Galaxy X, I love how it's a ship that folks keep complaining about, yet for some strange reason I find really rather powerful. lol). I'm not complaining about players who don't want a big challenge, in fact I find games that are nothing but challenge really frustrating after a while and tend to quit to play something else. Heck, if I was as much of a challenge fan as I may have come across, why have I NEVER tried to PUG Hive Onslaught? :D

    My aim was just to point out to people that the devs have now got a track record of NOT adding very challenging content, and are probably not suddenly going to start now. Lots of people seem to think that only they know the real facts, but the biggest fact, or truth, is that in the majority of MMOs the majority of players play in order to feel awesome, one way or another. They either want to be made to feel all powerful and heroic blowing up npc ships, or they want to do the same in PvP. The fastest way to turn a large game community into a small one is to make the content too challenging (ie. frustrating).

    Others have already hit the nail on the head here. The only people who really have even the slightest reason to feel a little cheesed off are the PvP community, as they are the only ones who WILL feel any real negative impact from T6 and T5-U, and feel pressured to pay out. However it's pretty apparent, to me at least, that the PvP gamer isn't really the target audience for STO.

    For everybody else, the ships they have haven't been nerfed or rendered obsolete in any way, unless they are a min maxer who has to have the best of everything (eg. me sometimes. lol), but that's a choice, nobody forces folks to min/max. T5 and fleet ships will continue to be just as useful in PvE content, all Scimitar teams will continue to roll through ISE as if they're just sneezing out brightly coloured death. The addition of T5-U and T6 is, truly, no different to when they added the Kumari, the Scimitar (and yeah, even the Romulans with the operative trait), the Avenger and the Mogh. It's no surprise though that people are getting so upset, they got upset with the release of those ships too... Yet folks are still happily using the Galaxy X, Excelsior, etc etc etc. Heck, I even saw a Defiant in ISE the other day (blowing up a lot, whilst trying to use strafing run tactics....).

    Fear of change is a powerful motivator for anger it seems.

    Me, I'm just not that bothered by it all, as I don't see the problem. It's really not that big a deal, and a lot of it will be "fixed" in a few months after release anyway, prompting more forum rage from folks who forgot that this is the cycle of new stuff in pretty much ALL MMOs, as the devs try to get things "right".

    MMOs are, in my experience, like a constant beta test but without character wipes. Test servers are more like alpha testing, the real testing starts on official launch.
  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    hartzilla wrote: »
    You know the more I think about it the more I'm starting to think their adding a nightmare difficulty and thats what the T6 and T5-U ships are for.
    ceekayzero wrote: »
    I think the EP disagrees with you:



    Like it or not, Cryptic has now officially told us that Lockbox/Lobi ship (and to a lesser extent, fleet and C-Store ships) are "investments", and I think looking at it that way, the forum rage about the cost is understandable. I think there's a good argument that you should be right and these ships should *not* be considered investments, but that's not how Cryptic or the game economy developed. Therefore, here we are.

    To me, what the T5-U versus T6 debate comes down to is whether or not a single BOFF power is worth more than a console slot. As we don't currently know how either will be implemented, there's a chance that some T5-U ships will be stronger and more competitive than a T6 ship, at least at first.

    Doesn't mean they're right. Which they aren't. When the game closes down, you'll be left with nothing. Hence, not an investment.

    An investment has to have SOMETHING to show at the end of it, even if it's just on paper. When the game goes, all we'll have is memories, fond and otherwise.

    Anyway. I look forward to my planned upgrades and flying my ships like I always do,.. while I evaluate if theres any T6 ships I like or think worth buying.

    Carry on, carry on.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    talonxv wrote: »
    Yes another tier 6 ship thread but this is something I feel NOBODY is asking besides me.

    Yes many are ticked (me included) about the whole tier 5U thing. But I asked people this WEEKS ago when the tier 6 ships were first announced and everybody just didn't want to listen or simply have blind faith that their precious tier 5 ships wouldn't be outclassed.

    So let me ask this again and it's a real simple question.

    What would be the point of tier 6 ships if they were not a cut above or stronger in some way?

    Seriously people what's the point?

    When you answer that question like I did, you'll see that tier 5 ships were NEVER going to be as strong as tier 6.

    I never expected the T5 ships to be like T6. But I was thinking they would be close. Like the T5 vs Fleet T5. They are very similar minus a few features. From what I read on the upgrades they was spot on to what I was thinking. They are still useable, not garbage, junk, or obsolete. Like many says they will be.

    My biggest issue was solved on the regular missions, rep grinds, etc. As you can still do them without having to upgrade. So that is optional if you want it. So that helped my issue out.

    As for the zen to spend, the company needs money to keep going. So the ones who wants the best, STFs, PVP won't have issues spending it to keep on playing like that. Myself I'm thinking on the upgrades, but now it will be at my own leisure.

    As for the new T6 ships, I'm not sure on them. Unless I see something I really want. The Typhoon class could be a candidate. I would jump on that ship.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    This thread needs MOAR RIDDLES!

    So here's one for all you Klingons out there! What what!

    A dirty yet honorable H-YOU-mahn in prison at Rura Penthe has a visitor. Afterward a most honorable guard asks the terran inmate who the visitor was. The inmate replies in a manner to pique the guard's innate sense of legacy honor and family values: "In my HOUSE, brothers and sisters I have none, but that man's father is my father's son." What's the relationship between the inmate and the visitor?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • grendelthewise#0990 grendelthewise Member Posts: 640 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    imadude3 wrote: »
    if the T6 romulan cruiser looks good, i'll get it. if not, im just gonna keep steamrolling all the content in my fleet D'deridex, most likely the new content too :D

    I agree with you. I figure if the new tier 6 ships are nice and shiny. I will get one like a car on a dealership's lot. If not I will stay with my tier 5U fleet excelsior. I have no problem paying a extortion fee just as long as the fleet excelsior gets a really nice upgrade. Even if it is a extra console slot or bridge officer slot. For now all we can do is hope.
    Fleet Admiral of the U.S.S. ATTILA KHAN-CDA (NX-921911).
  • illyrian2008illyrian2008 Member Posts: 271 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    talonxv wrote: »
    What would be the point of tier 6 ships if they were not a cut above or stronger in some way?

    None, and there would be no selling point or they would just release new T5 ships.
Sign In or Register to comment.