so i have all the different assault cruiser versions so i know alot of the parts resemble the Typhoon quite abit, so i was kinda hoping someone here could give me a good "recipe" for making my assault cruiser look as much Typhoon as possible.
pics would be nice but a good description is also usefull
Wrong pylons. You want either the Majestic or Noble pylons. image via STO Wiki
I'd also be more inclined to use the Majestic hull, though it's still not perfect.
I am NikkoJT, Foundry author and terrible player. Follow me!
There used to be a picture here, but they changed signatures and I can't be bothered to replace it.
Wrong pylons. You want either the Majestic or Noble pylons. image via STO Wiki
I'd also be more inclined to use the Majestic hull, though it's still not perfect.
i think the Imperial hull is more fitting. the majestic hull gets too narrow at the deflector, where as the Imperial hull retains it's battlecruiser bulkyness thorught and through
so i have all the different assault cruiser versions so i know alot of the parts resemble the Typhoon quite abit, so i was kinda hoping someone here could give me a good "recipe" for making my assault cruiser look as much Typhoon as possible.
pics would be nice but a good description is also usefull
I have a better Idea
Why not support the release of the actual Typhoon? Why have a lookalike when you could get the real thing?
So that people can have something to fit that role until your Typhoon campaign bears fruit? Kinda like how the Vesper class for the T2 Cruiser was a visually-similar stand-in for the Excelsior until that ship finally got released.
Member since November 2009... I think. (UFP) Ragnar
Comments
The pylons I think belong to one of the assault cruiser skins.
Saucer.. again one of the assault cruisers...
neck... no idea....
Hull... I think belongs to one of the galaxy hybrid ships.
image via STO Wiki
I'd also be more inclined to use the Majestic hull, though it's still not perfect.
There used to be a picture here, but they changed signatures and I can't be bothered to replace it.
i think the Imperial hull is more fitting. the majestic hull gets too narrow at the deflector, where as the Imperial hull retains it's battlecruiser bulkyness thorught and through
do we need to perhaps.... construct these pylons?
No
/10char
Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
I have a better Idea
Why not support the release of the actual Typhoon? Why have a lookalike when you could get the real thing?
http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1022731
So that people can have something to fit that role until your Typhoon campaign bears fruit? Kinda like how the Vesper class for the T2 Cruiser was a visually-similar stand-in for the Excelsior until that ship finally got released.
(UFP) Ragnar
oh i do support it, and what above said