test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Belleraphon

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0 Arc User
http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s400/chris_bob2/screenshot_2014-04-03-11-59-10_zps75567175.jpg

omfg, i have to say, the good thing we get to do in this game sometimes is correct modular mistakes on ships, such as the lackluster warp nacelles on the original intrepid model.

Thank you STO for allowing me to see waht the intrepid would look like if it had a good set of nacelles on it.

I actually really like the Belleraphon ship- if the saucer and hull got polished off, it would easily be the best looking ship in the game. I really love the deflector dish. If they positioned it to fit with the belleraphon bottom saucer, or that of the intrepid, id use it. its such a great idea!

"The OUTTIE Satalite deflector dish!"
Post edited by [Deleted User] on

Comments

  • arcbird010arcbird010 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    hm indeed, I too like the intrepid class, but actually I think the nacelles are fine as they are, if anything I think the intrepid looks a bit strange when viewed from certain bow angles, as the saucer section can appear to be quite disproportionally large to the rest of the ship.. And I've never liked the navigational sensor array in the front.. not to mention all the orangy/browny parts including some docking ports and parts of the main deflector.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    I love the Intrepid, but I must agree, it does look disproportionate- and its not the games fault- its the ship itself. It looks chubby and un streamlined.


    Don't take me wrong, I think chubby is like, synonomous with, awesome extras, but not in flight design.
Sign In or Register to comment.