however i bielieve that gecko will give him more turn by the way of set bonus that he was talking about in one of his last interview, in the same way of the odyssey set bonus ( +0.5 turn )
I'm not against console set bonuses boosting turn rate, your giving up console spaces to get something it's fair.
I just don't know how your going to get a set bonus on the Gal X.
I was once DKnight1000, apparently I had taken my own name so now I'm DKnight0001. If I ask you a question it is not an insult but a genuine attempt to understand why. When I insult you I won't be discreet about it, I will be precise and to the point stupid.
@badmonkey According to All Good Things the Galaxy X gave up Saucer Sepration for the Phaser Lance.
The toy is not Canon, and proves nothing.
I was once DKnight1000, apparently I had taken my own name so now I'm DKnight0001. If I ask you a question it is not an insult but a genuine attempt to understand why. When I insult you I won't be discreet about it, I will be precise and to the point stupid.
I'm not against console set bonuses boosting turn rate, your giving up console spaces to get something it's fair.
I just don't know how your going to get a set bonus on the Gal X.
you really should view the last podcast interview with gecko, he is the one speaking about it, not me.
saucer separation and set bonus with antimatter spread console, cloack console and separation console + a hangar, that what he have in mind for it right now, it may not happened but he seriously think about it
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised, took everything unique the KDF has so now working on what the RR has...
don't worry, it's not the galaxy that will took uniqueness away from RR.
he will never have a batlle cloack.
hangar are not something specific to RR as well as separation console.
if he would have acces to OP romulan bo instead of our second rate ambassy one that would began to be different tho.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised, took everything unique the KDF has so now working on what the RR has...
Aint asking for singularity powers or the battle cloak. Not really sure what the RR has that would be considered their besides they have probably the best Bo's for their ships respectively.
Dunno who he is but didn't ask for more turn, rest yea. I'm sorry I want a battleship something worthy of the name dreadnaught and the fact that it only gets two cruiser commands one of which doesn't fit personally (probably more my playstyle then actually not fitting the ship).
Yea my fleet Galaxy refit would probably come close to but wouldn't quite be a scimitar
First off no bloody hanger.. just so you know... not a request I made...
but on with it
6 Turn rate as it is now same inertia as now
Consoles
4 eng
2 science
4 tac
Bo Slots
Com Engineer, Lt Engineer
Ensign Science
Lt Com Tac, Lt tac
plus 10 to weapons plus 10 to shields
Integrated Lance with the Lance getting a bonus to ACC or a slot to give it the option to change damage type and add stats to it.
I don't wanna destroy all your dreams but has anyone already thought about this:
The G-X gets Saucer Sep
The G-R also has this
The x has a lance and the cloaking ability in addition
AND is more tac oriented
->the Fleet G-R would be inferior to the Fleet G-X if they really added 10% shield mod and hull
so ... considering this a fleet version seems unlikely (to me)
or am i wrong and has it already been confirmed? (you never know about Cryptic's Chaotic plans :P)
I don't wanna destroy all your dreams but has anyone already thought about this:
The G-X gets Saucer Sep
The G-R also has this
The x has a lance and the cloaking ability in addition
AND is more tac oriented
->the Fleet G-R would be inferior to the Fleet G-X if they really added 10% shield mod and hull
so ... considering this a fleet version seems unlikely (to me)
or am i wrong and has it already been confirmed? (you never know about Cryptic's Chaotic plans :P)
It's already confirmed and the R and X have nothing really to do with each other they are two different ships. They need to keep that in mind when they redo the G-X that just cause they added to it doesn't mean they can walk away without touching the G-R.
I don't wanna destroy all your dreams but has anyone already thought about this:
The G-X gets Saucer Sep
The G-R also has this
The x has a lance and the cloaking ability in addition
AND is more tac oriented
->the Fleet G-R would be inferior to the Fleet G-X if they really added 10% shield mod and hull
so ... considering this a fleet version seems unlikely (to me)
or am i wrong and has it already been confirmed? (you never know about Cryptic's Chaotic plans :P)
the galaxy refit already have a fleet version, and these ship are 2 different one with different gameplay intention.
and yes it has already been confirmed, and they better have, this ship is already TRIBBLE enought for it to stay ( again ) well behind the others.
Comments
The Romulan Republic...
I'm not against console set bonuses boosting turn rate, your giving up console spaces to get something it's fair.
I just don't know how your going to get a set bonus on the Gal X.
If I ask you a question it is not an insult but a genuine attempt to understand why.
When I insult you I won't be discreet about it, I will be precise and to the point stupid.
The toy is not Canon, and proves nothing.
If I ask you a question it is not an insult but a genuine attempt to understand why.
When I insult you I won't be discreet about it, I will be precise and to the point stupid.
you really should view the last podcast interview with gecko, he is the one speaking about it, not me.
saucer separation and set bonus with antimatter spread console, cloack console and separation console + a hangar, that what he have in mind for it right now, it may not happened but he seriously think about it
http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=528931&page=271
don't worry, it's not the galaxy that will took uniqueness away from RR.
he will never have a batlle cloack.
hangar are not something specific to RR as well as separation console.
if he would have acces to OP romulan bo instead of our second rate ambassy one that would began to be different tho.
http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=528931&page=271
Aint asking for singularity powers or the battle cloak. Not really sure what the RR has that would be considered their besides they have probably the best Bo's for their ships respectively.
Dunno who he is but didn't ask for more turn, rest yea. I'm sorry I want a battleship something worthy of the name dreadnaught and the fact that it only gets two cruiser commands one of which doesn't fit personally (probably more my playstyle then actually not fitting the ship).
Yea my fleet Galaxy refit would probably come close to but wouldn't quite be a scimitar
First off no bloody hanger.. just so you know... not a request I made...
but on with it
6 Turn rate as it is now same inertia as now
Consoles
4 eng
2 science
4 tac
Bo Slots
Com Engineer, Lt Engineer
Ensign Science
Lt Com Tac, Lt tac
plus 10 to weapons plus 10 to shields
Integrated Lance with the Lance getting a bonus to ACC or a slot to give it the option to change damage type and add stats to it.
Integrated Cloak
The G-X gets Saucer Sep
The G-R also has this
The x has a lance and the cloaking ability in addition
AND is more tac oriented
->the Fleet G-R would be inferior to the Fleet G-X if they really added 10% shield mod and hull
so ... considering this a fleet version seems unlikely (to me)
or am i wrong and has it already been confirmed? (you never know about Cryptic's Chaotic plans :P)
It's already confirmed and the R and X have nothing really to do with each other they are two different ships. They need to keep that in mind when they redo the G-X that just cause they added to it doesn't mean they can walk away without touching the G-R.
the galaxy refit already have a fleet version, and these ship are 2 different one with different gameplay intention.
and yes it has already been confirmed, and they better have, this ship is already TRIBBLE enought for it to stay ( again ) well behind the others.
http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=528931&page=271