test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Bortasq idea

chalpenchalpen Member Posts: 2,207 Arc User
edited February 2013 in Klingon Discussion
Can we have two more bortasq's?

A bortasq flight deck cruiser and a bortasq heavy destroyer.
You can use all/some of the consoles.


Flight deck cruiser:
3 front:back weapon slots.
37k hull
1hb
Console - shield repair drones

Destroyer
4 front/ 3 back
35k hull
Console - the shield dropping/ hull res buff that the intrepid has

Now you can have all the consoles on the ship if you want. But that would be nuts.

Either way, cryptic would have to create two new ships that can allow the bop pet and disrupter auto canon animation.

I was just day dreaming at work about how to make the bortasq usefull
Should I start posting again after all this time?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • mustafatennickmustafatennick Member Posts: 868 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    chalpen wrote: »
    Can we have two more bortasq's?

    A bortasq flight deck cruiser and a bortasq heavy destroyer.
    You can use all/some of the consoles.


    Flight deck cruiser:
    3 front:back weapon slots.
    37k hull
    1hb
    Console - shield repair drones

    Destroyer
    4 front/ 3 back
    35k hull
    Console - the shield dropping/ hull res buff that the intrepid has

    Now you can have all the consoles on the ship if you want. But that would be nuts.

    Either way, cryptic would have to create two new ships that can allow the bop pet and disrupter auto canon animation.

    I was just day dreaming at work about how to make the bortasq usefull


    Never going to happen the bortasqu is useful you just need to know how to fly her

    We have flight deck cruisers and mighty fine destroyers
    ----=====This is my opinion you don't have to listen and no one else has to read them these "OPINIONS" are based on my exploits and my learning other people will have their opinions and that's fine just don't knock my way of doing things thanks=====---- :cool:
  • chalpenchalpen Member Posts: 2,207 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    But the possibility of getting more ships and the ability to possibly use some of those consoles won't op the ships as far as I can see.

    Would it not be fun?
    Would it not be a cool idea to use the bop console on a fdc and have a sort of full fledge carrier if you choose?
    Or the bop console on the destroyer, launching the bop and basically leaving a skeleton crew back on the destroyer?

    Using the auto canon (like the peng) on the destroyer?

    It won't happen, I know. We as a faction. Don't deserve that much attention.
    But man that would be sweet.
    Should I start posting again after all this time?
  • mustafatennickmustafatennick Member Posts: 868 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Oh yeah the idea is awesome the idea of having the consoles which I think are really good on something more mobile is mouthwatering

    But it's quite poor how much we as a faction are not liked and the idea of another faction beig introduced is a bit of a joke If you ask me
    ----=====This is my opinion you don't have to listen and no one else has to read them these "OPINIONS" are based on my exploits and my learning other people will have their opinions and that's fine just don't knock my way of doing things thanks=====---- :cool:
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Don't want the Bortasqu' further mendled with. It's awesome as it is!

    BTW, Don't you think that it will do more good for the faction these ideas to be 2 new ships. Like one more new Orion Flight-Deck Cruiser and one new Ferasan Destroyer?

    Why would we need a Bortasqu' skin for ships that are obviosely different in nature by the standard one? I honestly, don't like the idea of a beastly looking megaship like the Bortasqu' to have 35k hull, just as one example.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • chalpenchalpen Member Posts: 2,207 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    shpoks wrote: »
    Don't want the Bortasqu' further mendled with. It's awesome as it is!

    BTW, Don't you think that it will do more good for the faction these ideas to be 2 new ships. Like one more new Orion Flight-Deck Cruiser and one new Ferasan Destroyer?

    Why would we need a Bortasqu' skin for ships that are obviosely different in nature by the standard one? I honestly, don't like the idea of a beastly looking megaship like the Bortasqu' to have 35k hull, just as one example.
    For one, the original bortasq don't need to be touched except to accommodate the possibility of the two new console combinations.
    Cryptic would still have to make 2 new models for the two new ships.
    Both will be 25% smaller in all angles then Imagine a shorter bortasq for the destroyer and a less wide bortasq for the flight deck (as a stupid but easy example of mine).
    Should I start posting again after all this time?
  • chalpenchalpen Member Posts: 2,207 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    At the very least, a bortasq flight deck cruiser.
    I am pretty stoked that this is a good idea.

    1) it doesn't get rid of or change the other bortasq's and
    2) may increase the sales of the original bortasq pack

    Same Bo layout.
    Man it would be fun to fly if they could have the base turn rate to at least a 7.

    Sorry for bumping my own thread but I think this is a winner.

    A 4 console set bonus.. /growl
    Should I start posting again after all this time?
Sign In or Register to comment.