test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Season 7 Dev Blog #33

pwebranflakespwebranflakes Member Posts: 7,741
edited February 2013 in Galactic News Network [PC]
Details about the Ambassador and Kamarag class ships are revealed in this entry of the Season 7 News Dev Blog series.


Link to the blog.
Post edited by pwebranflakes on
«1345

Comments

  • tehjoneltehjonel Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    decent stats. any fleet version? bridge? now to think of a name...
  • gregbgregb Member Posts: 47 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    shame we havent got the TNG refit skin (AKA Zhukov) for the ambassador..

    but like it non the less
  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Let it begin.
    GwaoHAD.png
  • qjuniorqjunior Member Posts: 2,023 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I like the BOFF setup for both vessels. Will there be Fleet versions ? Awesome Z-Store versions with alternate skins and/or special consoles ? :)
  • tsf00181tsf00181 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Can the Kamarag equip dual cannons? I don't see it listed in the stats.
  • hippiejonhippiejon Member Posts: 1,581 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Wow.
    A cruiser I'll actually want to use.
    Cool.
  • suavekssuaveks Member Posts: 1,736 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Curious - can the KDF ship mount dual cannons?
    PyKDqad.jpg
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Maybe the C-Store version will get the extra console. This seems exactly like the Bortasqu and Odyssey last year. Just a regular ship with no interesting powers and consoles, but C-Store version will come out with something interesting. Although the Odyssey got that slipstream buff. Not sure if they are going to do the 3 console bundle. Perhaps purchasing the C-Store version would give a T3 and T5 version that each has a unique console.
  • submersiblefoxsubmersiblefox Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    "A ship between a bop and a battlecruiser." PROTIP! THAT'S CALLED A RAPTOR!

    Edit: Woo! Page one!
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Solid designs, well rounded, and the Kamarag in particular looks like it'll be a solid addition to the KDF fleet. Cool.
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    So can they equip dual cannons?
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • nalonalo Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    What are the odds of a C-store version and maybe a bundle with a Tac and Sci ;)
  • zulisvelzulisvel Member Posts: 518 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Holy *redacted*

    Lt Cmd Sci. & Lt + En Tac.

    3/4/2 console layout.

    For both ships.

    The Kamarag is awesome and while I wish the Ambassador had a slightly higher turn rate I'd be afraid it'd be too powerful with one.
  • jamesdaxjamesdax Member Posts: 159 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    This looks better the the Galaxy-R. WTF??
  • burstdragon323burstdragon323 Member Posts: 853 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Both are nice, but the turn for the Amb is a dealbreaker for me. It's nowhere big enough to warrant a 7. It should be 9.
  • wesleycrasherwesleycrasher Member Posts: 117 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Pretty mediocre. The KDF ship is clearly superior with it not looking awful, a cloak, higher turn rate, and better power distribution, but that doesn't mean much. Boring, bland, and ugly. How unfortunate.

    Can't wait to see what silly consoles come on the c-store versions that no one will ever use, because you can only put them on these boring cruisers.
    All the toys you can't afford.
  • tehjoneltehjonel Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Pretty mediocre. The KDF ship is clearly superior with it not looking awful, a cloak, higher turn rate, and better power distribution, but that doesn't mean much. Boring, bland, and ugly. How unfortunate.

    Can't wait to see what silly consoles come on the c-store versions that no one will ever use, because you can only put them on these boring cruisers.

    who brought the good news bear? someone bring him a cookie.
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Will we be able to use these ships in the Foundry?
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    hippiejon wrote: »
    Wow.
    A cruiser I'll actually want to use.
    Cool.

    My thoughts exactly. I like flying cruisers, but I also like science captains. Science oriented cruisers? Yes, please!

    BTW, the Kamarag with that turn rate, the ability to cloak and although not mentioned but probably the ability to use dual cannons (like every klingon cruiser) seems very sexy to me and it will be fun to fly!
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • c0nd1t10nr3dc0nd1t10nr3d Member Posts: 638 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Pretty mediocre. The KDF ship is clearly superior with it not looking awful, a cloak, higher turn rate, and better power distribution, but that doesn't mean much. Boring, bland, and ugly. How unfortunate.

    Can't wait to see what silly consoles come on the c-store versions that no one will ever use, because you can only put them on these boring cruisers.

    Shut Up Wesley! (Sorry, Couldn't resist!) :D

    Pretty nice for free ships... I'm looking forward to hear what the c-store version/s will have to offer. :)
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    No cannons for the KDF ship? ok, no thanks. :P
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Looking at the stats, its funny the Ambassador and Kamarag are tactically more superior than the Galaxy-refit and the Negh'var, and en par with the Vor'cha Refit and the Sovereign.


    The Kamarag:

    Seeing the aft of the Kamarag, it is a nice transition cruiser between the K'T'inga and the Vor'cha. Though guess they upgraded the design for the 5th Century Nacelles. ;)

    But I have to ask the team, if the design was named after Ambassador Kamarag (Klingon Ambassador in the movies), I assume you killed him off before he made it to the mid 24th Century for the High Council to bestow the honor of naming ship class after him?

    We going to hear the story of the honorable way he died in combat?

    The Ambassador:

    As for the looks of the Ambassador, as pointed out, too bad there is no Zhukov variant for the refit. Still, believe the STO Ambassador's nacelles look larger than the actual model.
  • silence1311silence1311 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Details about the Ambassador and Kamarag class ships are revealed in this entry of the Season 7 News Dev Blog series.


    Link to the blog.
    This in my OPINION is S***. How can you be proud Cryptic for presenting this ship as a anniversary gift!?!? On the other hand I like the Kamarag. But both Ambassadors are c***. Even the Odyssey was way better. Almost no-one is gonna get it(Spare the few collecters ;) )
  • tangolighttangolight Member Posts: 777 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    This in my OPINION is S***. How can you be proud Cryptic for presenting this ship as a anniversary gift!?!? On the other hand I like the Kamarag. But both Ambassadors are c***. Even the Odyssey was way better. Almost no-one is gonna get it(Spare the few collecters ;) )

    Almost no one is going to get it? I'm completely certain that's not going to be the case. In fact, by tomorrow evening, I predict if you warp into Sol, Ambassador class ships will be the majority of the ones you see.
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    disappointed these arent fleet level ships, i only hope this means there will be fleet level versions soon. also disappointed the kamerang doesn't have an LTC tac, LTC sci on the kdf faction are beter left to orian ships. the rest of it all looks good though. at least they like the ambassador enough to give it a good station setup, and a competent number of tac stations. it wasn't going to replace the ody as the best healer, so it might as well have decent tactical power for us kirks! since the ambassador has about the same volume as a sovereign, a 7 turn rate is fair. pleasantly surprised the kamarag got a between ktinga and vorcha 10.5 turn too! post the inertia scored for once jeeze!


    will the kamarang replace my ktinga? good question. -1 very important flow cap console, -.5 turn, having to give up ether RSP2 or ET3 for something LTC sci. hmm, tough one

    the ambassador will be fun to play with, but that second ens tac will go a bit to waist, with 2 AtB i don't need 2 TT, it cant use torps to any effect, BO1 sucks, i guess i could run beams and have BO2 and FAW1 for garbage duty
  • wesleycrasherwesleycrasher Member Posts: 117 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Looking at the stats, its funny the Ambassador and Kamarag are tactically more superior than the Galaxy-refit and the Negh'var, and en par with the Vor'cha Refit and the Sovereign.


    Yep, though it was constructed 30 years before the galaxy class it is vastly superior to it. It is also on par with the galaxy retrofit, which was outfitted with technology that's 80 years after the Ambassador was constructed. Makes sense to Cryptic, I suppose.
    tangolight wrote: »
    Almost no one is going to get it? I'm completely certain that's not going to be the case. In fact, by tomorrow evening, I predict if you warp into Sol, Ambassador class ships will be the majority of the ones you see.

    Yeah, you'll see it everywhere for a few days, maybe even a week. Then everyone will move back to their ships that aren't awful.
    All the toys you can't afford.
  • odyssey47odyssey47 Member Posts: 524 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I can't believe how many people are complaining about something that's free and the only effort to get it is playing a new mission. Save your complaints for something that warrants it, then maybe it'll be taken seriously.
  • jamesdaxjamesdax Member Posts: 159 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    It really pisses me off that first cryptic screws over the Galaxy with the MUCH older Excelsior and now they TRIBBLE it over more with an old Ambassador. WTF is up with that?
  • c0nd1t10nr3dc0nd1t10nr3d Member Posts: 638 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    odyssey47 wrote: »
    I can't believe how many people are complaining about something that's free and the only effort to get it is playing a new mission. Save your complaints for something that warrants it, then maybe it'll be taken seriously.

    +1

    I applaud you good Sir! :)
  • atatassaultatatassault Member Posts: 1,008 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    A Turn rate of 7? Great, another awesome looking cruiser that I don't want to use.
Sign In or Register to comment.