test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Couple BoP console questions

jacenjacen24jacenjacen24 Member Posts: 159 Arc User
edited November 2012 in Klingon Discussion
1. Do you use the rcs for turn rate? Or is the natural turn rate more than enough and you put resistant consoles instead?
2. For sci am i stacking field generators? I have 2 and a stealth console. Should a ditch the stealth console and go three firld generators?
Post edited by jacenjacen24 on

Comments

  • rdm1958rdm1958 Member Posts: 822 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    just my humble opinion:

    don't waste console space on a rcs.

    ditch the stealth console and go with shield regen.

    consider the borg console too in an eng or sci slot.

    i recommend a borg console on every ship regardless of which set you use.
  • jacenjacen24jacenjacen24 Member Posts: 159 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    rdm1958 wrote: »
    just my humble opinion:

    don't waste console space on a rcs.

    ditch the stealth console and go with shield regen.

    consider the borg console too in an eng or sci slot.

    i recommend a borg console on every ship regardless of which set you use.

    Thanks. I have the borg console in eng as well as rcs. So ima ditch stealth and put the borg console there and ditch rcs and put resistance consoles my the 2 open eng spots.

    Sounds exciting.

    Ps i never thought it possible but i live flyin the BoP.
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    1. Do you use the rcs for turn rate? Or is the natural turn rate more than enough and you put resistant consoles instead?
    I've never used a RCS on a BoP before. Didn't seem to be any need.
    2. For sci am i stacking field generators? I have 2 and a stealth console. Should a ditch the stealth console and go three firld generators?
    Ditch the Stealth module and iether go 3 or 2 FG and a SHield Emitter Amplifier to increase your regenrate.

    It is possible to have so high a Cap on your shields that if they drop you may have issues getting them back up again without some seriuos heals.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • shookyangshookyang Member Posts: 1,122
    edited November 2012
    My B'rel Retrofit is designed for a full torpedo load-out.

    However, I do not see a need for an RCS console, as it already has one of the best turn rates.

    I also do not bother with Stealth consoles, and this is on a ship with Enhanced Battle Cloak. With 6 skill points into Stealth and Aux at 118, I can park my BoP on a Sci officer's sci ship with 125 aux, and they still can't see me at 0km.

    On my Fed's Tactical Escort Retrofit, I have no points in Stealth or consoles and have my aux set to 39/25. If I recall, I think I was spotted 2km away from the target...if that.

    If someone uses a reveal ability, you can't resist it.
  • saksagansaksagan Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Qapla!

    Or just Hi everyone.
    I am a Bop-Commander for just a few weeks, maybe seven or eight.
    Never ever i want fly something else!
    So, there are some questions, i have and i hope, there are some people, that could help me.

    My sweet little Boat is the Heghta-Class, my toon a tac.

    My Weapon Setup:


    Fore: 1x DHC, 2x DC, Quantumtorp
    After: 3x Turrets

    All Mk XII Borg, the Energy is Polaron

    Console Setup:

    Tac: 3x blue MK XI Polaron damage
    Eng: 2x blue MK XI Neutronium Alloy, 1x RCS
    Science: 1x blue MK XI Field Gen (more shieldpower), 1x Plasmonic Leech, 1x Borg-Console

    Other Stuff


    Deflector: Borg
    Shield: Honorguard MK XI
    Engine: Honorguard MK XI

    Other Sets are in the bank, but i dont know...i didnt seen the bonusdamage of the jemmy-set.
    MK XII i managed only to get the Shields of HG and Omega till this time, and i diddnt find some datas about the new sets.

    Energy-Levels:

    Weapon: All (Hit the 125)
    Engines: Rest

    Boff-Layout

    Commander: Tac: TT1, HY2, CRF, ATP B
    Lt: Tac : TT1, HY2
    Lt Com: Eng : EPTS1, EPTS2, EJWP
    Lt: Science : PH1, HE2

    Doff-Setup

    I played around with different ways and different styles, but till now there ist nothing, that makes me really happy with.
    Projectile Doffs, The ones for Evasive Maneuvers, "TT" or "Prepare on Impact"...Maybe i have to take a deeper look on the exchange for Cannon-Doffs....doesnt seen one till now.
    This is the point, where i need the advising at most, i guess.

    Sidenotes:

    I am playing for fun. And i am playing for free. Maybe there will be a time, where i spend some Money for Zen, but not at the moment. Till this time i didnt have a fleet and i didnt need it.

    Where the Bop in Pve like stf is a bit of...how to say...useless, i managed the elites without problems, make my damage, fly arround, kill probes and so on.
    Now, S7 Times,this may change, the bleedthrew of the borg is devastating,but i run elite infected and it works.

    To be honest, the Bop is no Ship for this silly crapshooting of non-moving material.
    The Bop is a PvP-Vessel. In my noobish Eyes it is THE Ship that bears the cross of the Klingon faction.
    Its the Side of the Evil. The smelling, dirty Counterpart of White Knights known as Federation. They have the Zen-Ships, the Know-How-Science and the pure mass.

    The KDF has nothing else their Experience, their Brains...and the Combat Cloak.
    And this is an amazingly powerfull mix up.

    So long, i am an pvp-fan^^

    I am not good, thats something completly different, but i bear the wish to get better.
    Till now my Heghta cloaks, searches for the right target (cruisers and escorts most of the time), rushes at them, buffs up and...alpha strikes it.
    This works well most of the time in Kerrat. Take a Prey that is otherwise engaged and it will be pop up. Even if i am outnumbered...like most of the time.

    If the enemy hit the TT-Button, i have a problem...but for what the one and only empire gave me the cloak?
    And otherwise...for sure:
    "Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!"
    or:
    "blHeghvlpchugh blHeghpu'."

    Thank you for reading this whole bunch, and more thanks, if you had an advice.
    I have to apologize for my broken english and for Thread-Capturing also.
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.