test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Nerf the Borg set - without changing it much

sophlogimosophlogimo Member Posts: 6,507 Arc User
Everybody knows: The Borg set is currently the most powerful space set in the game. Three pieces of it, that is, deflector, the engines , and the console, combined with a better shield, boost survivability enormously. And that set is essentially childishly easy to get, too.

The 3-piece set is in fact so powerful that no other alternative is even close to it. Choosing any other set is just not worth it, because one looses too much by not getting the 2- and 3-piece borg bonuses... (the only exception being 2-piece Omega plus 2-piece Borg set for cruisers, in some cases).

That is a pity. There are many wonderful sets in the game: MACO, Omega, Klingon Honor Guars, Jem'Hadar, Breen, Reman Prototype... none of these see widespread use because the Borg set is just so much better. That should not be the case.

But here is a solution: Simply change the order of set bonuses in the Borg set!

So instead of the current order, use this one:
  • Set 2: Assimilated Tractor Beam
  • Set 3: Autonomous Regeneration Sequencer
  • Set 4: Multi-Regenerative Shield Array

So, in order to have the Multi-Regnerative Shield Array, you actually have to equip the Borg shield. Makes sense, hm?

With this, the other alternatives start to make sense. The usual 3-piece Borg plus MACO shield combo is still useful, but nerfed to a point where it is at least debateable whether the 3-piece Borg or the Omega or whatever are better.
Remember, STO is nothing but a cosmetics game, where only the rule of cool matters. The game mechanics are intentionally out of balance, don't try to "optimize" anything, as it would just frustrate you.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • latinumbarlatinumbar Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Couldn't disagree with you more.
    _____________________
    Come join the 44th Fleet.
    startrek.44thfleet.com[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • felixzwrathfelixzwrath Member Posts: 8 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Just No.... Buff the other sets instead
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Nope. ....
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Why not giving a boost to some other sets? They could become really competitive. The reman shield would be far better with +10 or 15% resistance to all energy damage. The MACO set should give some more interesting tanking abilities instead of a useless graviton beam.

    The Jem'hadar set is really a good one, but it's based on passive regen, which isn't strong enough in game.

    There is no need to nerf this set, but making the existing ones usefull would be a great step.
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    oh man, every on just got their crutch kicked out from under them and they buttmad. i actually kind of like this idea
  • ussultimatumussultimatum Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    Choosing any other set is just not worth it, because one looses too much by not getting the 2- and 3-piece borg bonuses... (the only exception being 2-piece Omega plus 2-piece Borg set for cruisers, in some cases).

    You are very far off the mark.

    The Borg set is the one people go for because many of the other set bonuses are completely terrible.

    Magnetoplasma Arrays: Weak, and largely irrelevant bonuses.

    Heavy Graviton Beam: A joke power, that does next to nothing and is on a 2 or 3 minute cooldown.

    Gravitic Anchor: Another power saddled with a heinously bad cooldown. This power would be useful if it was either on a 30s cooldown or had a 30s duration.

    Mask Energy Field: Again, a fairly pointless addition and certainly not worth using three pieces in the set for. 3 min cooldown.


    People use 2 piece Omega and 2 piece KHG because the bonuses are actually useful. Most people don't worry about the above because they are terrible.


    You'll also notice most people don't bother with the 4th power in the borg set 1) because it requires you to use the borg shield and 2) because it's a tractor beam with a massively bad 4 minute cooldown.
  • noctusxxxnoctusxxx Member Posts: 108 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    DIAF Subby.

    The Borg set should not have been nerfed last December in the first place. They should have adjusted all of the other sets to be equal or better then it.
  • zordar01zordar01 Member Posts: 318
    edited August 2012
    noctusxxx wrote: »
    The Borg set should not have been nerfed last December in the first place. They should have adjusted all of the other sets to be equal or better then it.

    This.

    Don't nerf. Improve. There are reasons why people choose the gear they choose. The devs need to learn why and change other stuff accordingly, not remove the reason altogether.
    Star Trek: Online - Now with 100% more dinosaurs!!
  • bryguy#1741 bryguy Member Posts: 122 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    I'm not sure that nerfing the Borg set is necessary, nor rearranging its set bonuses. For my two cents on the matter I would suggest looking at the other sets and give them some adjustments, weather it's shield resistance, set bonus changes, or something else. Make them more appealing to use.

    Personally I stopped using the MACO because I can't stand the warp bubble effect. It gives me a headache after I look at it for a while and "disable visuals" only applies to the engine streaks. If the non-Borg sets were to get a once over I would like to see an option to hide the MACO warp field effect in addition to making the set bonuses more useful.

    Cheers :)
    Thank you for the T6 Galaxy Class. - I support Tovan Khev. - Please bring back the exploration missions.
  • snoge00fsnoge00f Member Posts: 1,812 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Hell no.

    I'm not grinding endlessly for PvP oriented sets or using loltastic PvE sets just for the sake of variety.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • aveldraaveldra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    I love how in every MMO I've played when something, be it a class, a spec, or a gear set is a little stronger than the rest the first thing most suggest is to nerf it. How about instead of nerfing we balance everything upwards for a change.
  • praghaspraghas Member Posts: 239 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    I don't use the Borg set and i'm quite happy. I don't think a change is needed. What is needed is more KDF content....
    Cloaking generators break down at first sign of language.
  • lostusthornlostusthorn Member Posts: 844
    edited August 2012
    You just want the borg tractor without giving up a good shield. nice try.
  • jslynjslyn Member Posts: 1,788 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Of my characters, only one uses the Borg Set --the full set, to boot. I am indifferent to the order of the abilities.
  • aarons8aarons8 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    the borg set is fine how it is.. we need to boost the sets NOT tied into STFs..
  • beezle23beezle23 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    aarons8 wrote: »
    the borg set is fine how it is.. we need to boost the sets NOT tied into STFs..

    Like make the Breen set a viable alternative. For an end-game set it has a lot of "meh."
    __________________________________________________
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] "I weary of the chase. Wait for me. I shall be merciful and quick."
  • trhrangerxmltrhrangerxml Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Where the heck did nerfing the Borg set come from, are you looking to get flamed? It is a good set and I recommend anyone to work on it while your working your way from 44-50, but after that there are far better sets. True, the Deflector makes you a lot more survivable, but look at the 2 piece bonus of the Omega, Tetryon Glide, basically giving all weapons a minor Tet proc. Personally fly 2x2 (2 Borg and 2 Omega) on most of my Escorts, but for a Tank there are far better sets like say Reman or MACO.
    Hi, my name is: Elim Garak, Former Cardassian Oppressor

    LTS, here since...when did this game launch again? :D
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    praghas wrote: »
    I don't use the Borg set and i'm quite happy. I don't think a change is needed. What is needed is more KDF content....

    A troll was spotted there.
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • cmdrskyfallercmdrskyfaller Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    A better solution is to add a console to each of the non-borg sets. That would allow people to mix and match 2-piece bonuses to fit their needs better.
  • horridpersonhorridperson Member Posts: 665 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    If there is a disportionate use of a space set it should be examined. It's here nor there (nerf one or buff the others) what the solution is; Only that a problem exists.

    A borg set is easy to obtain so it clearly shouldn't be the most desirable choice. But there it is. On far too many ships. What happened to "perfection"? What is that malformed growth on the front of your starship that makes it look like a stag beetle made out of garbage from a junkyard? I hate the borg set; especially on a fed cruiser when it disrupts those crisp, clean lines.

    If you won't disable the haphazard visuals at least balance the sets so I don't have to look at ships that resemble victims of a Victorian steampunk dentist.:)
    battlegroupad_zps8gon3ojt.jpg

  • p2wsucksp2wsucks Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    For PvE, I don't know why people wouldn't be using at least 2 part Omega anyway.

    The vast majority of PvE is basically a DPS race and the 2 part Omega gives free shield damage, the deflector adds free targeting, the engines have the best stats (aegis is close to the mkx/xi w/defense +5% boost). Then you could use KHG, Omega, or MACO shields based on flavor. The exception maybe certain sci build which don't use engergy weapons for damage, but instead TSSx to assist team while they spam CC & Torps.

    The procs really do effect PvP balance, but there's a lot that effects PvP balance that's not being addressed (eg Doffs). That said I don't know that giving people a free TB (one w/extended range) at such a low cost would be good for PvP either. Perhaps just have no 2 part bonus and bump the others up to 3/4 part set bonus while dropping the TB to 3 part bonus.

    Other set bonuses are more situational:

    Breen for transphasic mine/torps
    KHG for torps/aux
    Jem for polaron damage
    Aegis for defense % boost/hull resists
    MACO (not sure don't use Fed a lot, but I thought it reduced Boff cooldowns @ one point which would be good for builds w/long cooldown Boff skills)
    Reman for Plasma builds
    Borg still gives repair procs/TB

    Also, the 3 part Omega is very good if timed well. It lowers defense (more and better hits) prevents turn (more and better hits) and adds kinetic damage resists debuff which applies to torps, mines, and some Sci Boff abilities. If anything it's on the OP side, but so many use Borg as crutch they don't think to use it. For all that it does think of it as a free Captain ability.
    [Zone] Dack@****: cowards can't take a fed 1 on 1 crinckley cowards Hahahaha you smell like flowers
    Random Quote from Kerrat
    "Sumlobus@****: your mums eat Iced Targ Poo"
    C&H Fed banter
  • kattarnkattarn Member Posts: 105 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Do you want a advice?, dont ask for changes in things that are working well cuz we all know what hapens when someone touch the ''lets going to change sumething for the fun'' button.
    :D
  • captpeacemakercaptpeacemaker Member Posts: 230 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Totally disagree with OP.

    Borg set is fine the way it is. And actually I disagree with the setup you suggested as well. I use a 3-piece Borg set, and its the Engine, Shield and Console. Using a Positron Deflector to boost shield performance and structural integrity.

    Which set is the BEST is, like most other questions of this sort, dependent on the ship type, crew, bridge officers, skill point allocation, power allocation, setup, and of course the captain himself and playstyle.

    What I dont understand is this... if in your opinion the set is the best one in the game and is incredibly easy to get, why would you want it to be nerfed??
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Thowchum
    Legendary Starfleet Captain
    Fleet Leader, The Abductors
    STO Forum Member since December 2010
    Welcome to Star Trek Online, where our motto is 'Peace through Superior Firepower.'
  • standupguy86standupguy86 Member Posts: 207 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    I disagree completely with this, the sets that are 'unused' I see around constantly on random ships. And all of the sets Ive collected I actually use on the alternate ships Ive collected as well. So I dont have to constantly switch out sets from one ship to the other. And I still do serious damage.
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    i really cant believe what im reading. the sets already turn every other shield, engine and deflector into trash, and you want them all made even better then all the basic equipment? you really think thats a quality design direction? the sets are a cancer in this game.
  • atomicfbatomicfb Member Posts: 100 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    i really cant believe what im reading. the sets already turn every other shield, engine and deflector into trash, and you want them all made even better then all the basic equipment? you really think thats a quality design direction? the sets are a cancer in this game.

    Sets SHOULD be better than the basic items. That is part of the point of them being sets so yes.
  • savnokasavnoka Member Posts: 176 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    i really cant believe what im reading. the sets already turn every other shield, engine and deflector into trash, and you want them all made even better then all the basic equipment? you really think thats a quality design direction? the sets are a cancer in this game.

    The basic equipment is just that -- basic.

    It's like complaining about purple / elite gear in any other game, it's there for a reason -- because you have to go through something to get it. I've never understood this impulse to suggest everything should be utterly mediocre, but it usually emits from those who feel upset someone else has something they don't.

    As for the OP's suggestion, that will only ensure that the only set being used is Borg. An earlier poster hit it on the head -- the only thing the other sets have is nice looking graphics, the set bonuses are either laughable or completely useless. Nerfing what works into something broken will only upset people more and not fix any issues.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • eagledracoeagledraco Member Posts: 340 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    All STF sets are supposed to be better than basic equipment. Why? Because Cryptic wants you to grind STFs to get them. (i.e. Play longer so you are around to buy the next product.)

    You can start out with The 'Retro' Borg Set. It has already been nerfed. It is the cheapest of the STF sets in terms of grind time and thus very popular.

    The other sets - MACO, Omega, KHG are supposed to be better than the Retro Set. Why? Because they require much more time for the player to obtain.

    If people are saying the 3 main STF sets suck compared to the Retro set then the 3 main sets need a boost. People have played much longer to get those sets.

    And those who have played to get the Retro set shouldn't have it nerfed (yet again) probably just because some PvPers see it too much in their matches and don't like it's heal. :rolleyes:
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    savnoka wrote: »
    I've never understood this impulse to suggest everything should be utterly mediocre, but it usually emits from those who feel upset someone else has something they don't.

    I had to quote this, I just had too. It's funny cause it's true. :D
  • synthscanner#2101 synthscanner Member Posts: 470 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    A better solution is to add a console to each of the non-borg sets. That would allow people to mix and match 2-piece bonuses to fit their needs better.

    This is an idea I've always liked, also I'd much rather see improvements to the non Borg sets, rather than a nerf to the Borg set.

    I use 2 piece Borg set and 2 piece Honour Guard Mk XII set on my Hegh'ta Heavy BoP because of the obvious reasons stated in the OP.

    I've also always wondered if Cryptic ever plan to make it so there is Mk X, XI and XII items for the Borg set as well as the Aegis set (or any other set that could potentially have a Mk XII upgrade).

    Though I must agree that it does make more sense for the shield regen Borg set bonus to only activate if the shield is equipped along with the other 3 pieces, but I'm not to bothered, that's more of a technicality than a balance issue.


    P.S. If you're interested check out my concept idea/proposal for a Borg ground set (have any ideas of your own, feel free to post them (link below))...

    Here in this month old thread "Ideas for New Mission Items/Rewards!"
This discussion has been closed.