test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

What has changed since F2P?

mediklesmedikles Member Posts: 28 Arc User
edited August 2012 in PvP Gameplay
hello,
ive stopped playing some years ago (before F2P) and wonder how things have changed,

here some questions:

1. Talking about pvp, is the game fair for everyone or is it pay2win now?

2. On which side are more pvp players needed? Still FED or Klingons? ( Are there maybe new races to pvp with?)

3. Any major changes in the pvp mechanics? Maybe new maps etc?

4. Looks like i cannot use my original cryptic forum profile with my old join date , right?

thx
aLL!!
Post edited by medikles on

Comments

  • velktravelktra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Since I wasn't around before F2P, I can't answer your question about new maps (though from what I've gathered, they haven't changed much). However, the game seems pretty fair; I have no zen items on my ship, but I do pretty well in PvP (well enough that I've been hunted, which amuses me).

    And looking at the game queues... the Klingon side is nearly always empty when I go to PvP, but there also seems to be a lack of Federation PvP'ers in some queues.
    Demons run when a good man goes to war.
  • baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    1. if you were a subscriber and had a VA, you probably had a VA ship (tactical escort retrofit, long range sci vessel retrofit, etc...)
    Those cost money now, but are still very competitive. The normal T5 ships are not much behind, but some consoles that came with those c-store ships can make a difference but only a little.

    2. Needed, is out of the question...play whatever you want...but klingon side is heavily underpopulated.

    3. no big changes that are worth mentioning...some sets from the redesigned stf's are a must have (maco shield for example)

    4. yeah you need to merge a PWE accout (create one) with your old to logg into the game or enter the forum.
    Go pro or go home
  • mediklesmedikles Member Posts: 28 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    velktra wrote: »
    Since I wasn't around before F2P, I can't answer your question about new maps (though from what I've gathered, they haven't changed much). However, the game seems pretty fair; I have no zen items on my ship, but I do pretty well in PvP (well enough that I've been hunted, which amuses me).

    And looking at the game queues... the Klingon side is nearly always empty when I go to PvP, but there also seems to be a lack of Federation PvP'ers in some queues.
    baudl wrote: »
    1. if you were a subscriber and had a VA, you probably had a VA ship (tactical escort retrofit, long range sci vessel retrofit, etc...)
    Those cost money now, but are still very competitive. The normal T5 ships are not much behind, but some consoles that came with those c-store ships can make a difference but only a little.

    2. Needed, is out of the question...play whatever you want...but klingon side is heavily underpopulated.

    3. no big changes that are worth mentioning...some sets from the redesigned stf's are a must have (maco shield for example)

    4. yeah you need to merge a PWE accout (create one) with your old to logg into the game or enter the forum.

    thX u2, that will do as backup 4 now!

    BTW
    Hows population in general these days???
  • aquitaine985aquitaine985 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    medikles wrote: »
    hello,
    ive stopped playing some years ago (before F2P) and wonder how things have changed,

    here some questions:

    1. Talking about pvp, is the game fair for everyone or is it pay2win now?

    2. On which side are more pvp players needed? Still FED or Klingons? ( Are there maybe new races to pvp with?)

    3. Any major changes in the pvp mechanics? Maybe new maps etc?

    4. Looks like i cannot use my original cryptic forum profile with my old join date , right?

    thx
    aLL!!

    I didn't do much PVP prior to F2P so take what I say with a pinch of salt lol

    1. Not sure fair is really the right word, if you're a great player with one of the lockbox ships that have appeared while you were gone then you are more then likely going to win. But if your a great playing in any ship then you can do well!

    2. I don't fight the Klinks much, the queues seem quiet when i'm around. But i'd say both factions needed more PVPers.

    3. No new maps, no new gametypes. But as a previous poster said, STF sets in some mix or another are important.

    4. PWE ****ed the forums up.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    @Aquitaine985
    Lag Industries STO PvP Fleet - Executive
    A Sad Panda of Industrial calibre.
    2010: This is Cryptic PvP. Please hold the line, your call is very important to us...
  • marctraiderzmarctraiderz Member Posts: 539 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    blablalbalbalba
    medikles wrote: »
    hello,
    ive stopped playing some years ago (before F2P) and wonder how things have changed,

    here some questions:

    1. Talking about pvp, is the game fair for everyone or is it pay2win now?
    Its never 100% fair, someone who cannot obtain a specific lockbox ship versus someone who has it, yup, there is always a difference. But that difference is just as different as one having a Red Matter Capacitor since the game launched, and someone who hasnt. Also someone having a lockbox ship with higher stats do not necessarily mean that he will perform better then you. Skill in this game is still necessary although alot of people believe otherwise these days. Also, ships that were previously obtainable with VA tokens are no longer free, so those are basically also pay2win now in the eyes of a Free2player. As for every aspect in pvp, you need to obtain and take what is best, ship wise, ability wise, weapon wise.

    2. On which side are more pvp players needed? Still FED or Klingons? ( Are there maybe new races to pvp with?)
    KDF requires much more players to make the queue pop somewhat more for them.


    3. Any major changes in the pvp mechanics? Maybe new maps etc?
    No, except for all the new fancy toys that have been released which are (logically) able to be used also in PvP. Some stuff have been balanced, some stuff hasnt been touched in ages. Weapon procs have been balanced out a bit. (Although some still claim they are GRAVELY OVER POWERED hahahahahha) Chroniton procs has been fixed and is now resistable by Dampeners (And immunity with stuff like omega), has been in the patch notes, but so far the patch has not really been implemented lol

    4. Looks like i cannot use my original cryptic forum profile with my old join date , right?
    thx
    Chnk all the signatures of people you'll know the answer.
    aLL!!
  • renarcenerenarcene Member Posts: 32 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    medikles wrote: »
    hello,
    ive stopped playing some years ago (before F2P) and wonder how things have changed,

    here some questions:

    1. Talking about pvp, is the game fair for everyone or is it pay2win now?

    2. On which side are more pvp players needed? Still FED or Klingons? ( Are there maybe new races to pvp with?)

    3. Any major changes in the pvp mechanics? Maybe new maps etc?

    4. Looks like i cannot use my original cryptic forum profile with my old join date , right?

    thx
    aLL!!



    1. Other than OP lockbox ships, P2W isn't that big of an issue to a skilled player.

    2. ALL of PVP is in a slump right now due to players grinding resources and FM (Fleet Marks) for their fleet starbases. Once the higher tiers become widely available (it could take months) the qeues will pick up again. But, the Klingons are always less numerous thans Feds.

    3. There have been major changes to the skill tree since F2P. Now you can use any weapon type without having to specifically spec into it. Phasers are still OP, the STF shields bonuses make plasma useless, Transphasics got a bleedthrough boost, and Polarons & Tetryons got a boost. There are also new double proc energy weapons like the Phased Tetryons (Phaser and Tetryon procs, shield stripping nightmares), Spiral Wave Disruptors (Phaser & Disruptor procs), etc, etc. Many folks say that Sci abilities have been nerfed into oblivion, but they're actually just alot less OP (I probably lit a fire with that one). I highly recommend speccing as much as possible into Flow Capacitors, Power Insulators, and Inertial Dampners. Also, any ship weapons you do have should have at least 1 if not 2 [Acc] mods on them or they will be useless. It doesn't matter how often you crit or how severe if you can't hit the target.

    4. No, you cannot. You can still edit you avatar, & put your join date in your signature, if that really matters...
    I like my Sci guy & I like my Sci ship & that's that.
  • webdeathwebdeath Member Posts: 1,570 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    medikles wrote: »
    hello,
    ive stopped playing some years ago (before F2P) and wonder how things have changed,

    here some questions:

    1. Talking about pvp, is the game fair for everyone or is it pay2win now?

    2. On which side are more pvp players needed? Still FED or Klingons? ( Are there maybe new races to pvp with?)

    3. Any major changes in the pvp mechanics? Maybe new maps etc?

    4. Looks like i cannot use my original cryptic forum profile with my old join date , right?

    thx
    aLL!!

    1: You don't need P2W. But some use the Crutch to try to improve their game play. Other wise No.

    2: FED has more population

    3: Nope.

    4: Yay PWE's forum stylings.. enjoy.. :rolleyes:
    You think that your beta test was bad?
    Think about this:
    American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • p2wsucksp2wsucks Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    1. P2W has been around for a long time now, it's just been a matter of increasing degree lately. Both ships and consoles can provide a siginificant boost.

    Still, there are other issues like imbalanced doffs, imbalanced weapon procs, glitches (eg latelty dealing w/locking peoples weapons down), and imbalanced sets (borg 3 part and lesser extent Omega 2 part).

    2. KDF.

    3. Introduction of Doffs, Sets, lotto/z-store ships and their consoles. Skill revamp was another big change about 8 months ago. Nothing specific to PvP.

    4. Pretty low on my priority list tbh.
    [Zone] Dack@****: cowards can't take a fed 1 on 1 crinckley cowards Hahahaha you smell like flowers
    Random Quote from Kerrat
    "Sumlobus@****: your mums eat Iced Targ Poo"
    C&H Fed banter
  • mediklesmedikles Member Posts: 28 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    nice input! thx again!

    Hows game population in general?
  • aquitaine985aquitaine985 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    medikles wrote: »
    nice input! thx again!

    Hows game population in general?

    Hard to tell, you try and count people but they never stay still.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    @Aquitaine985
    Lag Industries STO PvP Fleet - Executive
    A Sad Panda of Industrial calibre.
    2010: This is Cryptic PvP. Please hold the line, your call is very important to us...
  • mediklesmedikles Member Posts: 28 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Hard to tell, you try and count people but they never stay still.

    Guess that means not2bad ;)
  • reynoldsxdreynoldsxd Member Posts: 977 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    medikles wrote: »
    hello,
    ive stopped playing some years ago (before F2P) and wonder how things have changed,

    here some questions:

    1. Talking about pvp, is the game fair for everyone or is it pay2win now?

    2. On which side are more pvp players needed? Still FED or Klingons? ( Are there maybe new races to pvp with?)

    3. Any major changes in the pvp mechanics? Maybe new maps etc?

    4. Looks like i cannot use my original cryptic forum profile with my old join date , right?

    thx
    aLL!!

    Answer To all of that: it got worse.
Sign In or Register to comment.