mehee the most pointless of the doffs for the most part. Not that the changes are bad... just pretty much likey the way they should have been to begin with.
Yeah, I can understand that.. Makes me wonder how that effects the stacking of those Doffs.. or if they are going to be removing the Stacking possibility from those Doffs.
You think that your beta test was bad?
Think about this: American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
at least it matches the parameters of the ability. 3 roles of 50% no mater what grade is nice, and down to cooldown only takes 3 green, or 2 blue with less proc chance.
but if these were made so only 1 can be equipped then they are will continue to be not nearly reliability enough to use instead of doubling up on tactical powers.
3 doffs all purple must have two of those to proc to get it perfect not going to happen.. Chance based "sustained dps" Is a horrible setup anyway you cut it.
Beefs up sci and target sub system skills to where they was
for cannons it removes stacking for OP sustained DPS using BOFF as a main buffer
up the damage on quads to be more inline as stated on their intent as "the most powerful cannons in game" which they are not as DHC are out performing them.
either it is good or bad will depend on how the PVP system uses it.
Currently with the system a touch scrambled, and we know a major change is coming, question is, what is it?
in current scheme, eh... puts the target subsystems back as it was other then that... meh, not much. i'll test it more tonight.
Comments
Think about this:
American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
but if these were made so only 1 can be equipped then they are will continue to be not nearly reliability enough to use instead of doubling up on tactical powers.
I'd go with worse, personally, but I'll be giving it a look later on. I may be wrong.
either it is good or bad will depend on how the PVP system uses it.
Currently with the system a touch scrambled, and we know a major change is coming, question is, what is it?
in current scheme, eh... puts the target subsystems back as it was other then that... meh, not much. i'll test it more tonight.