test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Tac Fleet Escort Carrier, bow to the knowledge of the Cryptic, you unbelievers

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
edited June 2012 in PvP Gameplay
And they said Tac Carriers can't be done. The Cryptic has shown us the way
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    lead us, oh mighty cryptic....

    we shall blindly follow.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    I actually suggested a One-hangar version of the Raptor for the KDF last year, a couple of months before I quit; it was different in design but the concept remained the same (called it an Assault Carrier).

    Of course it goes to the feds though....
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    wrote:
    I actually suggested a One-hangar version of the Raptor for the KDF last year, a couple of months before I quit; it was different in design but the concept remained the same (called it an Assault Carrier).

    Of course it goes to the feds though....
    Did you also suggest that the ship should not sacrifice anything for this ability?

    Mustrum "Probably not, you're sane, or at least my type of insanity" Ridcully
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    To be honest .... this is better then the mvam but not by much.... and mainly only because cryptic has nerfed all the sci to hell.

    Runs and hides.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Did you also suggest that the ship should not sacrifice anything for this ability?

    Mustrum "Probably not, you're sane, or at least my type of insanity" Ridcully

    This is the puzzle for me too, the ship still has overall same number of BOFF powers and weapon slots and gets fighters too

    At least a conventional carrier loses two weapon slots , mind you the Orion maurader cruiser only loses a consol for it's hangar, but this appears to lose nothing and gets a P2W consol too.

    Most players are already experiencing graphic issues with spam , invisible warp plasma and gravr wells etc and last night there quite a few having stutters and freeezing.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Covenanter wrote:
    Most players are already experiencing graphic issues with spam , invisible warp plasma and gravr wells etc and last night there quite a few having stutters and freeezing.

    Lol, that game I played last night with you guys, I flew into invisible EWP acouple times.
    There were 3 carriers in the game, I don't think any mines really, some GW and EWP... I've seen individual teams with more spam than that.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Sivar wrote: »
    I actually suggested a One-hangar version of the Raptor for the KDF last year, a couple of months before I quit; it was different in design but the concept remained the same (called it an Assault Carrier).

    Of course it goes to the feds though....

    Oh I'm sure we will get ours... when they get around to it.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Sivar wrote: »
    I actually suggested a One-hangar version of the Raptor for the KDF last year, a couple of months before I quit; it was different in design but the concept remained the same (called it an Assault Carrier).

    Of course it goes to the feds though....

    Just give me a raptor-r with battle cloak please....:D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Husanak wrote: »
    To be honest .... this is better then the mvam but not by much.... and mainly only because cryptic has nerfed all the sci to hell.

    Runs and hides.

    A mvam cannon build in a adv escort is pretty dam good
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Just give me a raptor-r with battle cloak please....:D

    Your mouth to the Devs ears...................

    Though they could just make a BC upgrade so it could be moved other KDF ships (within reason) and increase the CD after decloak based on ship size.
    zero increase for the raptor
    +10 seconds for battle cruisers.
    No ability to mount a BC on any carrier or the Borti.

    It would be worth it for the fed whine alone.....................
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Your sig sounds like a heavenly melody to me, Roach.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Your sig sounds like a heavenly melody to me, Roach.

    Been on a BBT binge lately and the name of Leonards Mothers book struck me as poetic in relation to the attitudes of some feds.

    I've changed the sig, since then though.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    I would like to see the Klingons get a new ship class, call it a Strike Cruiser. The Strike Cruiser would be able to fire a volley of three devices such as tri-cobalt devices or High Yield Plasma Torpedo’s. The Strike Cruiser would be a Tactical/Engineer Highbred. Did I mention that it would also be allowed to fire torpedos from 12km? Yeah! That’s right! Make it so!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    ...and they are falling quickly out of space one by one, just like little flies....
Sign In or Register to comment.