What if mystic had a 100% purify skill?
Xx_BeLLa_xX - Harshlands
Posts: 7,231 Arc User
Please do not start to hate on me without read, thank you.
A mystic did made a suggestion recently and I wanted to see what clerics think of that suggestion (since it's the only class with a single target purify). Here's the suggestion:
Make a genie's skill for mystic only (which is a good suggestion in my opinion), but the girl suggest that the skill is a 100% chance of purify on a target, that I think is crazy and I don't agree.
So I wanted to know how clerics feel about that? I'm a mystic myself and think it's ridiculous to want to have that on mystic. (but then again I'm sage and have a single target purify)
If you want to reply directly to the suggestion thread here's the link: http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1683901
I think too much people already compare clerics and mystics and I think a genie skill like that would just makes things even worse.
So what do you guys think about that?
A mystic did made a suggestion recently and I wanted to see what clerics think of that suggestion (since it's the only class with a single target purify). Here's the suggestion:
Make a genie's skill for mystic only (which is a good suggestion in my opinion), but the girl suggest that the skill is a 100% chance of purify on a target, that I think is crazy and I don't agree.
So I wanted to know how clerics feel about that? I'm a mystic myself and think it's ridiculous to want to have that on mystic. (but then again I'm sage and have a single target purify)
If you want to reply directly to the suggestion thread here's the link: http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1683901
I think too much people already compare clerics and mystics and I think a genie skill like that would just makes things even worse.
So what do you guys think about that?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
b:dirty "I **** rainbows and love everyone"-Longknife b:cute
b:dirty "I **** rainbows and love everyone"-Longknife b:cute
Post edited by Xx_BeLLa_xX - Harshlands on
0
Comments
-
i can agree, but usualy when im in a squad we have a cleric, usualy cleric DD's and my mystic heals. if purify is needed the cleric stopss dd and purify's, but sage break in the clouds has 25% chance to purify yet I have never seen it actualy purify lol, im sure it does. but a genie skill that has 100%, maybe 50% is a better choice, don't need more QQ about how mystics are OP, compared to other classes mystics are far from OP, I have yet to see a non r9 mystic that can solo fc in under 15 mins, I have a sin friend that did it in g15/rank8 chest and g16 daggers in 12mins, that is OP.0
-
I wouldn't go with 100% purify. Probably purify chance based on dex ala Badge or something.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"subtraction has the butt of an angel" - Paulrogers
I Subtraction.
/blatant sig copy is blatant
105/105/105 obtained! b:cute0 -
Well I personally would like to leave the purifying for clerics (or heck, for sage psychics), mystics have so much other kinds of shields and heals plus a whole different playstyle after all. We don't need to make mystics be the "cleric 2" class.
Purify is really needed in very, very rare occasions. I've had FSP squads where cleric did not purify and people blocked telekinesis off with spark or faith.Leader of Cyanure on Valonsurma and a proud member of Vertu
Demon Strength Barbarian 103/103/101
Demon Pure Mag Cleric 102/102/101 | Demon 4 APS Assassin 102/102/101 | Demon Pure Mag Mystic 102/101/101 | Demon Pure Mag Psychic 100/100/93 | Demon 4 APS-Barbarian 100/100 | HA-venomancer 100 | DPH Assassin 100 | Pure Mag Wizard 100 | Demon Pure Mag Stormbringer 96 | Demon DPS Archer 94 | Sage Vit Barbarian 93 | Demon All-Path Blademaster 93 | Str Seeker 86 | Pure Mag Venomancer 81 | Pure Mag Wizard 81 | Pure Dex Duskblade 470 -
Colum - Raging Tide wrote: »Well I personally would like to leave the purifying for clerics (or heck, for sage psychics), mystics have so much other kinds of shields and heals plus a whole different playstyle after all. We don't need to make mystics be the "cleric 2" class.
Purify is really needed in very, very rare occasions. I've had FSP squads where cleric did not purify and people blocked telekinesis off with spark or faith.
Agreed. b:pleased0 -
All of the mystic skills that do have a chance of purfiy give chi....
If mystics did have a 100% purify skill... it would need to cost like 50 chi!0 -
Colum - Raging Tide wrote: »Well I personally would like to leave the purifying for clerics (or heck, for sage psychics), mystics have so much other kinds of shields and heals plus a whole different playstyle after all. We don't need to make mystics be the "cleric 2" class.
Purify is really needed in very, very rare occasions. I've had FSP squads where cleric did not purify and people blocked telekinesis off with spark or faith.
i agree too, already more way for purify also already enough similiar the cleric and mystic, both got fast and aoe heal, debuff pdef and mdef similiar ratio, ressurect different way but sense same), buff (cleric got 60% pdef and mystic got more) etc0 -
only if cleric would get mystics rez buff for personal use only0
-
Xx_BeLLa_xX - Harshlands wrote: »
I think too much people already compare clerics and mystics and I think a genie skill like that would just makes things even worse.
I'm not sure it can be worse though. At first people saw mystics as a kind of clerics, even if there were a lot of differences, just because they didn't really know the mystic class
Then PWE chose to add UVD and the possibility to spam Great Cyclone like Mystics were doing with NV.
Then with New Horizons they chose to combine two healing skills because a mystic could heal a single target more efficiently with BitC.
So well...~ Sage Mystic 105-105-105 ~
~ Sage Sin 103-103-102 ~
~ Sage vita Barb 103-102-101 ~
~ Sage BM 102-101 ~ Demon Archer 102 ~
~ Sage Cleric 102 ~ Demon Wizard 101 ~
~ Sage Seeker 101 ~ Sage Psy 101 ~
~ Sage Heavy Veno 101 ~ Demon Storm 9X ~ Dusk 6x ~
Started playing this game in 2007 on Oracle (PW-MY) : Demon MG 101 - Sage EP 99 - WF 890 -
One of the issues of pwi is how often we "need" a specific class for something. Usually it's barb and cleric, but occasionally sins or BMs for paint or HF, or some people "need" seekers for Delta. Anyway, having different classes that overlap gives us some versatility.
I remember the cleric forums going bat guano crazy because we were "being replaced" because there'd be a second class that can heal and no one would ever want a cleric again. Ridiculous, obviously, but I think people are doing the same thing with this thread. If mystics got purify all of a sudden the classes would be too close? Not like clerics have summons, aoe debuffs, plants, lysing, etc or mystic have a reliable revive, dot heal, or buffs. There still would be plenty difference between the classes, it'd just remove some of the pressure to find a healer and it having to be a cleric. In many instances purify is so important.
Plus, if mystics could purify also it may put more pressure on clerics to not just heal but to purify. Can't find a cleric that can do more than chromo-spam or IH stack while you're cursed then use a mystic.
I do like the idea of it being slightly different but still able to replace a cleric-only purify. A couple of ideas would be:
~Purifies negative debuffs from target but sleeps them.
~Casts a purify aura for 15 seconds where negative debuffs have a 20% chance to be removed per hit.
~Purifies target but blocks target from receiving heals for 10 seconds.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 697 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk