No Rollback? Good. A few questions first though.

FirstJustice - Lost City
FirstJustice - Lost City Posts: 108 Arc User
edited November 2013 in General Discussion
I know this is being discussed in the main threat as well, however, seems like they're still discussing the rollback which obviously is NOT happening.

I'm alright with the rollback not happening, but there are still a few questions that remain unanswered.

1. The Abusers of the code, how are you going to seperate them from players that unintentionally have gotten more than they ment to get. Obviously, if I were one of the abusers, i'd just say i clicked and didnt know that was going to happen. You CANNOT base the punishment on the statements of the players which leads me to believe that they're not going to punish anyone for this. *applause for the abusers and
Post edited by FirstJustice - Lost City on

Comments

  • FirstJustice - Lost City
    FirstJustice - Lost City Posts: 108 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Forums are buggy for me, nevermind, sorry for posting this
  • Vedovis - Lost City
    Vedovis - Lost City Posts: 942 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    FirstJustice - Lost City wrote: »
    I know this is being discussed in the main threat as well, however, seems like they're still discussing the rollback which obviously is NOT happening.

    I'm alright with the rollback not happening, but there are still a few questions that remain unanswered.

    1. The Abusers of the code, how are you going to seperate them from players that unintentionally have gotten more than they ment to get. Obviously, if I were one of the abusers, i'd just say i clicked and didnt know that was going to happen. You CANNOT base the punishment on the statements of the players which leads me to believe that they're not going to punish anyone for this. *applause for the abusers and

    Thought you were a pro-rollback advocate.

    They probably can't, or won't. "Due to the number of players "ACCIDENTALLY" glitching, and since there is no way to verify who legit abused and who didn't, there will be no punishment. Yay!~" /sarcasm. Is why rollback was only fair option.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    | Signature made by Fishy!~ | Semiretired |
  • Eeyes - Harshlands
    Eeyes - Harshlands Posts: 46 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    There is a poll for rollback on the Compensation thread started by GMs.. So, we might just get a rollback
    Leave no one behind

    A.R.K
  • opkossy
    opkossy Posts: 11,177 Community Moderator
    edited November 2013
    Please do keep things to the main thread either way. b:surrender

    As for your question:
    OPKossy wrote: »
    They're aware people may have gained more than 3 unintentionally due to system lag.

    They also, I'd assume judging from that response, know where the max for that would be that someone not actively attempting to abuse the system would get.

    So those below that maximum are likely safe while those above it are not. Naturally, telling people this maximum would be a bad idea since then we'd get "smart" cheaters in the future who would abuse that knowledge. Assuming, of course, that the page isn't fixed by the time that such a thing would become an issue.
    (Insert fancy image here)
    image
This discussion has been closed.

Categories