Change the rules for INI edits

I hear they're taking actions against "overly negative people", too (I was actually hoping this was a joke, seeing as how I'm mostly angry about PWE's ****).

Do they realize how hard it is to be "PWE positive :DDDD" when they do things like this? Coming down on people for aesthetics and letting people who cheated levels do what they want

They don't even listen to us. When was the last time a GM responded to a single topic in here (seriously asking)?

We have a this topic, that's years old, rotting here. We get no compromise. We even get reprimanded. What do you expect from the playerbase, when they're constantly ignored? "Thanks for ignoring us~ you have the greatest game ever, going on here!! We love yew FEREVERZZ"?

It doesn't work like that. Common sense, anyone? Treat someone like ****, they'll give you **** in return. Eventually, they'll come to their senses?

Maybe this is just a crazy thought, but if/when the advanced makeover scrolls come out it will have 'unlocked' updated options for hair, eyes, and what have you. You know kinda like ini edits only we'll pay for it through the cash shop.b:beg

Coral_blades - Dreamweaver wrote: »

i fully agree that the .ini edits do nothing to effect the game, plus the gms would hav an easier job if they wernt paying attention to people with .ini changed toons and pay more attention to those who accually do things to effect the game against the rules (what i hav said is pretty much what frankieaye said) link--> http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1382811 b:cute

this +1

shopitup wrote: »

I doubt they're doing that, seeing as how I'm still not banned. (If they are doing that, and don't ban me, I may have to ragequit from the insult.)

It is 100% definitely happening but I think it's mostly certain forum trolls who go on negative tirades for weeks on end and continue even when they run out of things to say and have to resort to +1s and song links and the like. I don't know if it's necessarily people in-game. Seems like a lot of those bans may have been security ones instead.

Gotta love this topic. Active for a year, very supported, and continuing to prove how much the suggestion box is used.

Its probably been posted somewhere in the last hundred pages but there should be a comp to come up with edits that actually look good. For example Ive seen those skinny barbs that look rubbish in my opinion but there is a barb running around with ini edited arms and the proportions make the barb look awesome, and better than the official design.

As for things like hair and eyes, I mean seriously who gives a **** about that? It should be allowed across the board.

All the PWI philosophies about looks went out the window when they introduced motorbikes into the game as far as Im concerned.

friendly bump to keep my hope of better toon eyes

i fully support the idea of allowing .ini changed files....nuff said b:cool

bumpity

i approve this message.

Miugre - Heavens Tear wrote: »

This.

I honestly have a neutral opinion on INI edits. This game offers plenty of customization options already (except for barbs). The hair, I'll give you - and they should allow every character to have the hair texture option (y'know, the straight/wavy/rainbow/etc). But I don't see how the inability to make a stick-figure character or a fat barb is a cause worthy of a crusade.

I also do not agree with allowing EG third-eyes on other chars. o.O C'mon, that's like their only identifying feature. And yes, I'm aware that there are ways to make pseudo-human EGs (and TBs, for that matter), but to put EG eyes on a human is just going to confuse the newbies.

I have not read the whole thread but I am assuming the EG eyes thing isnt referring to the 3rd eye, but more the actual eye texture for the normal eyes. if you look closely the EG eyes are much better looking and less plain/dull than the older eye textures. not sure if this is what was meant, just a guess

Hey, that is a nice siggy. If only my cleric's eyes were that bright.

*sigh*


I still support this thread.

I support this message.

VenusArmani - Dreamweaver wrote: »

I said bump bump, bump bump bump. Bumpity bump bump.

Mod Approved, sig changed.

truekossy wrote: »

Always happy to see it reinforced that this thread has the Moderator Seal of Approval.

Well, at least one