Seeker damage increased!

GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
edited February 2012 in General Discussion
told you DD seeker was a good build hahahaha
Objective: Complete
Post edited by GallaxXIII - Sanctuary on
«1

Comments

  • thenewclass
    thenewclass Posts: 52 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    i wonder why seeker's domage should be raised it was very high already especially vortex saw a r9 seeker killing 2 r9 archers (+11 refined/+2def shards) in like 5 secs :P with vortex so i wonder why they'd raise the domage 2 ruin pvp and make them 1 shot everyone? they r tanks so domage shouldn't be as high as a sin for example who gets 1 shotted most of the time.....
  • _Perses_ - Lost City
    _Perses_ - Lost City Posts: 1,917 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    They are still worthless now that BM's have one of their best skills :p
    Nothing worthwhile to mention here, enjoy the animated signature~

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    thenewclass wrote: »
    i wonder why seeker's domage should be raised it was very high already especially vortex saw a r9 seeker killing 2 r9 archers (+11 refined/+2def shards) in like 5 secs :P with vortex so i wonder why they'd raise the domage 2 ruin pvp and make them 1 shot everyone? they r tanks so domage shouldn't be as high as a sin for example who gets 1 shotted most of the time.....
    only fail seekers rely on vortex...

    im a gemini slasher.
    Objective: Complete
  • GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    plus all those seekers go hybrid tank.... you havent even seen their full power yet lol
    Objective: Complete
  • GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    and a barb is a tank, not a seeker. a seeker is an additional aoe dd.
    learn the classes please.
    Objective: Complete
  • GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    _Perses_ - Lost City wrote: »
    They are still worthless now that BM's have one of their best skills :p

    i dont stun either. so those f4gs can go ahead and stun me lol

    like lv 100 bm's with full cascade glow werent almost getting 3 hit lol
    Objective: Complete
  • laloner
    laloner Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    If its true that seeker party buffs no longer need a mirage seekers will be using them a lot more. And the seeker party attack buff increases attack less than bladed fervor and overwrites it. So I wonder if the attack increase balances out what you lose from overwriting bladed fervor.
    AKA PermaSpark, Heartshatter
  • S_Swipe - Sanctuary
    S_Swipe - Sanctuary Posts: 119 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    laloner wrote: »
    If its true that seeker party buffs no longer need a mirage seekers will be using them a lot more. And the seeker party attack buff increases attack less than bladed fervor and overwrites it. So I wonder if the attack increase balances out what you lose from overwriting bladed fervor.

    You saber the party than bladed for yourself. Seems like your trying to say saber is better than bladed. With bladed you get the +1 to def lvl and + 1% crit along side the +3 atck lvl.
  • Hexalot - Dreamweaver
    Hexalot - Dreamweaver Posts: 871 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    laloner wrote: »
    If its true that seeker party buffs no longer need a mirage seekers will be using them a lot more. And the seeker party attack buff increases attack less than bladed fervor and overwrites it. So I wonder if the attack increase balances out what you lose from overwriting bladed fervor.

    Currently when Seekers buff squads with attack levels they then promptly overwrite the buff on their own weapon with bladed fervor. All it means now is that we are spared the expense of a mirage while doing it. b:victory

    The damage skill increase sounds... interesting.
  • GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    you use saber then fervor? like they stack? ugh you have no idea what your doing. reroll a sin or something. skills are obviously too much work for you.

    plus. i found myself countlessly buffing squads using mirages with saber, then i fervor'd myself. how nice of me xD

    and i think it may be ALL damage, not just skill damage mr hexalot. so check it out man!
    Objective: Complete
  • S_Swipe - Sanctuary
    S_Swipe - Sanctuary Posts: 119 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary wrote: »
    you use saber then fervor? like they stack? ugh you have no idea what your doing. reroll a sin or something. skills are obviously too much work for you.

    plus. i found myself countlessly buffing squads using mirages with saber, then i fervor'd myself. how nice of me xD

    and i think it may be ALL damage, not just skill damage mr hexalot. so check it out man!

    Really. I think some one needs to learn how to read I guess huh? Again, you use saber for the party to get the +3 attack level AND THEN use Bladed for your self.

    Saber's bonus is: +3 attack level.

    Bladed's bonus is: +3 attack level, +1 Def. level and +1% crit change.

    Which would you rather >_> Didnt even hit that they stacked.
  • Hexalot - Dreamweaver
    Hexalot - Dreamweaver Posts: 871 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary wrote: »
    you use saber then fervor? like they stack? ugh you have no idea what your doing. reroll a sin or something. skills are obviously too much work for you.

    plus. i found myself countlessly buffing squads using mirages with saber, then i fervor'd myself. how nice of me xD

    and i think it may be ALL damage, not just skill damage mr hexalot. so check it out man!

    Gallax... for the umpteenth time... kindly delete your Seeker. You are embarrassing the rest of us. b:bye
  • GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    kindly delete my seeker?
    psh.
    id probably put a good scratch on your 101. wanna try ****?
    Objective: Complete
  • Inflictia - Raging Tide
    Inflictia - Raging Tide Posts: 69 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    Lol....


    What's so hard about being nice to your squad and give them +3 attack bonus.
    AND THEN use Bladed Fervor to give yourself and extra +1% Crit and +1 Defence level??

    What's so hard about understanding that?
  • GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    if i need elemental resistance. I'll get it. but as im doing fine against lv 100's at lv 96. i think ill be just fine. you just better hope i dont break myself lol. cause you WILL die. faill azz whatever the hell you are
    Objective: Complete
  • Inflictia - Raging Tide
    Inflictia - Raging Tide Posts: 69 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary wrote: »
    if i need elemental resistance. I'll get it. but as im doing fine against lv 100's at lv 96. i think ill be just fine. you just better hope i dont break myself lol. cause you WILL die. faill azz whatever the hell you are

    You make absolutely no sense at all, do you?
  • GallaxXIII - Sanctuary
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    inflicta, thats exactly what im saying :)
    Objective: Complete
  • Inflictia - Raging Tide
    Inflictia - Raging Tide Posts: 69 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary wrote: »
    inflicta, thats exactly what im saying :)
    Apparently not, cause you were saying a whole bunch of other things..
  • Inflictia - Raging Tide
    Inflictia - Raging Tide Posts: 69 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    Hence:

    "you use saber then fervor? like they stack? ugh you have no idea what your doing.'



    And you are 96 right? Don't rage on someone when you are saying that, you'll make a total noob out of yourself. He didn't even say anything about stack <.<
  • S_Swipe - Sanctuary
    S_Swipe - Sanctuary Posts: 119 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary wrote: »
    inflicta, thats exactly what im saying :)

    How does that saying go...? Oh yea:

    Dont fight with an idiot they will drag you down to their level and beat you.

    Better yet your join date is this month and your already "95." Says enough right there.
  • Inflictia - Raging Tide
    Inflictia - Raging Tide Posts: 69 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    Discussion over. Seeker damage will increase and I like it cause now we can basically do a bit more damage pulling FCC and at bosses etc. Ohwell, I'm not really bothered since seekers did a lot of damage anyway, even when you are going tank/DD hybrid build.
  • Hazumi_chan - Sanctuary
    Hazumi_chan - Sanctuary Posts: 1,264 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    GallaxXIII - Sanctuary wrote: »
    if i need elemental resistance. I'll get it. but as im doing fine against lv 100's at lv 96. i think ill be just fine. you just better hope i dont break myself lol. cause you WILL die. faill azz whatever the hell you are

    Wizards. If you are still out there... this is your chance to get into his head that HA classes need elemental defense! :D

    /not to mention upping your pk-count oneshotting him and trying out some damage b:avoid/
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Ebrithalia - Dreamweaver
    Ebrithalia - Dreamweaver Posts: 441 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    Hazumi_chan - Sanctuary wrote: »


    Wizards. If you are still out there... this is your chance to get into his head that HA classes need elemental defense! :D

    /not to mention upping your pk-count oneshotting him and trying out some damage b:avoid/

    b:cry why is he not on dreamweaver, so much peeps i know would drop him in one shot. and yeah, magic def is a must o.O like, really important o.o
    Ebrithalia -Sage Seeker
  • Divine_Death - Dreamweaver
    Divine_Death - Dreamweaver Posts: 1,491 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    Yeah they had to buff it because how fail the class was. b:bye
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    "Closing this for excess letter Q's" - hawk
  • Hazumi_chan - Sanctuary
    Hazumi_chan - Sanctuary Posts: 1,264 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    Divine_Death - Dreamweaver wrote: »
    Yeah they had to buff it because how fail the class was. b:bye
    b:laughb:laughb:laugh

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ntkn
    ntkn Posts: 14 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    >implying that +3 atk lvl increase matters.

    lawl seekers. there decent DDers, but there support buffs suck hardcore.
  • ReMakaBo - Archosaur
    ReMakaBo - Archosaur Posts: 845 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    ntkn wrote: »
    >implying that +3 atk lvl increase matters.

    lawl seekers. there good DDers, but there support buffs suck hardcore.

    Considering people are paying 20+ million for a shard that gives (1) attk lvls- I would say those buffs are a bit better than "suck"
    re
  • ntkn
    ntkn Posts: 14 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    ReMakaBo - Archosaur wrote: »
    Considering people are paying 20+ million for a shard that gives (1) attk lvls- I would say those buffs are a bit better than "suck"


    im sorry your right. they are a bit better then "suck". so ill upgrade it to "slightly" suck. sry for thatb:thanks

    its not like sins already can get +35 atk lvl and a psy can get +25 atk lvl or anything.
  • XScootaloo - Dreamweaver
    XScootaloo - Dreamweaver Posts: 234 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    ReMakaBo - Archosaur wrote: »
    Considering people are paying 20+ million for a shard that gives (1) attk lvls- I would say those buffs are a bit better than "suck"

    I wouldn't spend 20k on those shards. i cant think of a time where i said to somepony "celestia damnit.... if i had one more atk lvl i could beat so-and-so". ill stick with my vit stones and drakeflame stones tyvm.
    With the living avatars of friendship by your side and the orbital friendship cannon at your back, look the wraiths in there soulless eyes and ask them. "will you accept my friendship undead scum?"

    [sigpic][/sigpic]
  • ReMakaBo - Archosaur
    ReMakaBo - Archosaur Posts: 845 Arc User
    edited February 2012
    XScootaloo - Dreamweaver wrote: »
    I wouldn't spend 20k on those shards. i cant think of a time where i said to somepony "celestia damnit.... if i had one more atk lvl i could beat so-and-so". ill stick with my vit stones and drakeflame stones tyvm.

    I re-read my post, and still have yet to see where I said "because XScootaloo will pay 20+mil for shards that give (1) attk lvls"
    re

Categories