Luring PQ Boss to Safe Zone
ASS_ASS__IN - Lost City
Posts: 84 Arc User
Some -removed- people luring PQ boss to Safe Zone. Is it Bannable or not? GM response only please
Post edited by ASS_ASS__IN - Lost City on
0
Comments
-
So sorry but you made an error. -removed- isn't in -removed- and yes it should be banned.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
***_***__IN - Lost City wrote: »Is it Bannable or not?
Says the totally-not-goon-glitched 105 Sin[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|Active: Coalescence - Lost City, Wizard|
|Inactive: StormHydra - Sanctuary, Archer|
|Call of Duty: Black Ops|League of Legends|Forsaken World|Perfect World International|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim|0 -
"GM response only please"
Trolol. Forum newb.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
_Surreal_
Thank you Silvychar for my siggy0 -
Clearly, the GM in OP's post stands for Good Manner.0
-
-
Sarrafeline - Sanctuary wrote: »Grassy Monastery?
Good Morning!0 -
-
alright got some screeny, thanks though0
-
Luring a boss, be it from PQ or anywhere else, into a safe zone intentionally is indeed a banable offence.
If you have screenshots of this happening Fuzzy suggests submitting a ticket and including the screenshot and any other relevant information.0 -
Luring a boss, be it from PQ or anywhere else, into a safe zone intentionally is indeed a banable offence.
If you have screenshots of this happening Fuzzy suggests submitting a ticket and including the screenshot and any other relevant information.
Then ban Dipter, after killing my cleric and sending cleric back to town he run into town and killed him again.
b:cryBladedZero - Sanctuary
"Also I don't think actually playing through the game helps your skill either."
-And we wonder why this game has gone to hell b:cute0 -
Glitching your toon to 105 is also a banable offence. Oh wait, there are only goon glitchers in venge, all sinsurrects made the lvl legit.0
-
Man, always those bad -removed- people making a mess. b:laugh[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Licensed tail brusher of ƙɑƙʊɱɑʊ ~ only the fluffiest
Outrunning centaurs since 2012~0 -
Personal experience but I can't say I've ever been banned for luring baby bosses to towns, just warned... Maybe it's just big bosses like WBs and PQ bosses.0
-
And on a more topical point, who the hell does those PQs anymore to even be a victim? b:puzzledBladedZero - Sanctuary
"Also I don't think actually playing through the game helps your skill either."
-And we wonder why this game has gone to hell b:cute0 -
Luring a boss, be it from PQ or anywhere else, into a safe zone intentionally is indeed a banable offence.
If you have screenshots of this happening Fuzzy suggests submitting a ticket and including the screenshot and any other relevant information.
not entirely true aslong as the boss dont aoe it isnt bannable gms said this be4 if it does aoe its considered bannable0 -
0
-
Fuzzy quotes Fuzzy in case you missed it.
... This is where they're going to ask about "accidentally". Which in itself is funny because if you're "accidentally" pulling a strong boss to where there's unsuspecting people, the first reaction most people would have is to give up and die.
I'll just go with the stance that, I believe, frankieraye took on issues like this in the past: If you need to ask, it's bannable. And by trying to define the limits, you're only making yourself look like a villain-in-the-making.
It's much better to simply ban everyone without mercy than allow for ambiguity. Mostly because the ambiguity will be abused to all hell, plus they really don't have the time to deal with people pleading their cases.not entirely true aslong as the boss dont aoe it isnt bannable gms said this be4 if it does aoe its considered bannable
Not true. It could still be using to kill unsuspecting people via transferring to boss to them by means of AoE, e.g. A seeker who is using Vortex would attack the boss and get the aggro and thus die.I am Olba. Not Ol, not Baze nor Blaze. And even less would I go by Olblaze. Please, take a second to read a person's username.
If you see b:cute be sure to take a second, calm look at anything I said.0 -
Olbaze - Sanctuary wrote: »... This is where they're going to ask about "accidentally". Which in itself is funny because if you're "accidentally" pulling a strong boss to where there's unsuspecting people, the first reaction most people would have is to give up and die.
I'll just go with the stance that, I believe, frankieraye took on issues like this in the past: If you need to ask, it's bannable. And by trying to define the limits, you're only making yourself look like a villain-in-the-making.
It's much better to simply ban everyone without mercy than allow for ambiguity. Mostly because the ambiguity will be abused to all hell, plus they really don't have the time to deal with people pleading their cases.
Not true. It could still be using to kill unsuspecting people via transferring to boss to them by means of AoE, e.g. A seeker who is using Vortex would attack the boss and get the aggro and thus die.
Harshly banning without ambiguity can be just as heavily abused.
And time out a seeker vortexing in SZ b:surprisedBladedZero - Sanctuary
"Also I don't think actually playing through the game helps your skill either."
-And we wonder why this game has gone to hell b:cute0 -
Traz - Dreamweaver wrote: »Harshly banning without ambiguity can be just as heavily abused.
Of course, but it's much less effort, time and less likely.And time out a seeker vortexing in SZ b:surprised
... Is this the point where I point out that it's very possible to kill people by luring a boss and having them accidentally take aggro via AoEs?I am Olba. Not Ol, not Baze nor Blaze. And even less would I go by Olblaze. Please, take a second to read a person's username.
If you see b:cute be sure to take a second, calm look at anything I said.0 -
Olbaze - Sanctuary wrote: »... This is where they're going to ask about "accidentally". Which in itself is funny because if you're "accidentally" pulling a strong boss to where there's unsuspecting people, the first reaction most people would have is to give up and die.
I'll just go with the stance that, I believe, frankieraye took on issues like this in the past: If you need to ask, it's bannable. And by trying to define the limits, you're only making yourself look like a villain-in-the-making.
It's much better to simply ban everyone without mercy than allow for ambiguity. Mostly because the ambiguity will be abused to all hell, plus they really don't have the time to deal with people pleading their cases.
Not true. It could still be using to kill unsuspecting people via transferring to boss to them by means of AoE, e.g. A seeker who is using Vortex would attack the boss and get the aggro and thus die.
then its your fault for aoeing and hitting the boss a boss who dont aoe cant kill another person if they jsut stand afk b:bye nice try to troll tho0 -
Broederjr - Lost City wrote: »then its your fault for aoeing and hitting the boss a boss who dont aoe cant kill another person if they jsut stand afk b:bye nice try to troll tho
... Nice try at bending the rules.
Except it's not working.
And I really can't see how you would blame a person, who is, e.g. aoeing some mobs at one of the many usual zhen locations and then some jackass comes in with a boss and the aoeing character gets aggro because said jackass walks into the AoE with the boss.I am Olba. Not Ol, not Baze nor Blaze. And even less would I go by Olblaze. Please, take a second to read a person's username.
If you see b:cute be sure to take a second, calm look at anything I said.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk