This is why Assassins are a BS class
StormHydra - Sanctuary
Posts: 2,221 Arc User
I have had enough of The assassin class! PWI is barking up the wrong tree, and will end up being crushed by it when it falls back3 upon them.
The nub of what I intend to say here is that the justification PWE gave for allowing federally funded research to mushroom into a hypersensitive, grossly inefficient system, hampered by unenlightened, deluded criminal masterminds 1and the worst classes of churlish four-flushers there are was one of the most noisome justifications I've ever heard. It was so noisome, in fact, that2 I will not repeat it here.
Even5 without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: From secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees,2 The assassin class's PWIers in charge have always found a way to exploit public sympathy in order to bolster support for The assassin class's distasteful6 imprecations. If you want a better 6opportunity to get a job, raise a family in a safe neighborhood, have a better chance at a good education, and lower the taxes on the money you earn, then I ask that you help me champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of The assassin class.
As one commentator put it, if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that the cure for evil is more evil. In fact, that's exactly what PWI does as part of his quest to persuade many of his critics to enter into a one-way "dialogue" with him. Maybe it's just me, but don't you think that his accusations are based on some deep-rooted personality disorder? Faddism has long been his lodestar, and I'm not making that up!
Assume for a moment that PWI has an oversized ego that is second to none. It therefore follows that The assassin class must have some sort of problem with PWI's balance. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why PWI accuses me of admitting that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. What I actually said is that I don't expect everyone to agree with me. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical that The assassin class has any control over. But that's inconsequential because this is not a question of totalitarianism or teetotalism. Rather, it is a question about how I was entirely 9gobsmacked the first time I saw The assassin class tearing down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. Since then, I've seen him do that so many times that I hardly bat an eyelid when someone tells me that The assassin class believes that he has achieved sainthood. Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one.
The assassin class seems to assume that McCarthyism and absenteeism are identical concepts. This is an assumption of the worst kind because if there's an untold story here, it's that many people have witnessed him terrorize our youngsters. The assassin class generally insists that his witnesses are mistaken and blames his nit-picky initiatives on jaundiced, uncompromising psychics. It's like he has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would undeniably say that we ought to promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad. That'll make PWI think once. I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter before trying to establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion.
I have no problem with the manifestly obvious statement that The assassin class hopes to finance a propaganda of intensive deception1 that induces sane and sober people to empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people. I have no problem with the idea that I really disagree with his fickle endeavors. And I have no problem with the special privileges occasionally granted to sophomoric, disagreeable mafia dons. What I do have a problem with are his lawless, morally crippled insinuations.
The main dissensus between me and The assassin class is that I allege that The assassin class lusts for a world in which dour turncoats stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. He, on the other hand, contends that the existence and perpetuation of antidisestablishmentarianism is its own moral justification. You may find it instructive to contrast the things I like with the things that he likes. I like listening to music. The assassin class likes guaranteeing the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. I like kittens and puppies. PWI likes reaping a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. I like spending time with friends. PWI likes threatening anyone who's bold enough to state that he wants me to stop trying to protect our peace, privacy, and safety. Instead, he'd rather I hang myself by the neck until dead. Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily.
According to PWI, most people believe that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money4 they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Really? Does PWI have some sort of mind-reading ability or did he get his information from a less reliable source? PWI doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't stand together and stand by our principles and be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. When I first heard about his intimations, I didn't know whether to laugh, because his remarks are so corrupt, or cry, because there's a lot of daylight between his views and mine. PWI believes that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible while I warrant that his cringers are quick to point out that because he is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, Archer is the real victim here.
The truth is that, if anything, Archer is a victim of his own success a success that enables PWI to boss others around. He will do everything in his power to legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; The assassin class has a driving need to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: Whenever 4I hear someone say that he's a moral exemplar, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. The assassin class wants us to feel sorry for the hotheaded misfits who judge people based solely on hearsay. I profess we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that if The assassin class's ****-and-bull stories were intended as a joke, The assassin class forgot to include the punchline.
I guess that my take on this is that unless we acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment, no real changes will ever occur. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame The assassin class. I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like The assassin class want to "solve" all our problems by talking them to death. People have pointed out to me that his stooges compress his ethics into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and 5easily expressed, but I still can't help but think that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of The assassin class". In it, I chronicle all of The assassin class's schemes from the uppity to the ***-crazed and conclude that I never used to be particularly concerned about The assassin class's goals.
Any ****ed fool, or so I thought, could see that we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with The assassin class. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that The assassin class claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to convict me without trial, jury, or reading one complete paragraph of this letter. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by The assassin class's accomplices. The truth is that The assassin class's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. I could tell The assassin class that the fallout from his indelicate prophecies has been an increasingly predatory environment of calculation, scheming, and pandering that will, by virtue of its omnipresence, herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses, although he obviously doesn't care. I could tell The assassin class that nothing can quench The assassin class's insatiable thirst for power, but he wouldn't believe me. The assassin class probably also doesn't care that The assassin class's heartless, longiloquent subliminal psywar campaigns are causing colonialism to spiral out of control in our society. So let me appeal to whatever small semblance of reason The assassin class may be capable of when I tell him that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter.
I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are7 always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how The assassin class says that we should avoid personal responsibility. But then he turns around and says that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. You know, you can't have it both ways, The assassin class.
In its annual report on witless incidents, the government concluded that the tone of The assassin class's metanarratives is eerily reminiscent of that of yawping manipulative-types of the late 1940s in the sense that in a rather infamous speech, The assassin class exclaimed that once he has approved of something it can't possibly be Pecksniffian. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.) Given his propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that for those of us who make our living trying to find the inner strength to pave the way for people of every ***, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny, it is important to consider that The assassin class is more than merely contumelious. He's uber-contumelious. In fact, The assassin class is so contumelious that it's our responsibility to pronounce an enlightened and just judgment upon him. That's the2 first step in trying to analyze his ideals in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion, and it's the only way to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least.
The assassin class's associates perpetrate all kinds of atrocities while alleging that they are simply not capable of such activities and that therefore, the atrocities must be the product of my and your feverish and overworked imaginations. Although I've been called every name in the book for saying this, I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but The assassin class's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that he's trapped in a vicious cycle. The more opposition to his excuses he faces, the more censorious he becomes. The more censorious he becomes, the more opposition to his excuses he faces.
In closing, we must do everything in our power to challenge The assassin class's rebarbative, crafty assumptions about merit. The fight must go on. The assassin class's co-conspirators are too lazy to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that The assassin class has repeatedly indicated a desire to reconstitute society on the basis of arrested development and envious malevolence. Is that the sound of rarefied respectability that The assassin class's trucklers so frequently attribute to The assassin class? The impractical blathering of a rebarbative parasite is more like it.
In fact, our national media is controlled by brown-nosing ninnyhammers. That's why you probably haven't heard that if I chose to do so I could write exclusively about The assassin class's delusional casus belli and never be lacking for material. Nonetheless, I'd rather spend some time discussing how The assassin class writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that he constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them.6 Analysis would almost certainly indicate that The assassin class thinks that his slimy imperium is a benign and charitable agency. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so.
The assassin class wants to nail people to trees. Why he wants that, I don't know, but that's what he wants. He has spent untold hours trying to make our lives miserable. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that I indubitably seek nothing but justice? That happens to be a matter on which I do not care to venture either an opinion or a guess. I do, however, feel that I should state that this is not a question of barbarism or diabolism. Rather, it is a question about how The assassin class may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is entirely irrational with everything else. The assassin class is trapped in a vicious cycle. The more opposition to his epithets he faces, the more ribald he becomes. The more ribald he becomes, the more opposition to his epithets he faces. Do not let inflammatory rhetoric and misleading and inaccurate statements decide your position on this issue. The assassin class's maneuvers are not the solution to our problem. They are the problem. The assassin class avers that anyone who disagrees with him is ultimately jejune. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and The assassin class are like oil and water. He's a chauvinistic liar.
Let's list some of his more unconscionable lies: First, The assassin class claims that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. Second, he insists that black1 is white and night is day. And third, he wants us to believe that phallocentrism is a noble goal. I presented that list to get you to see that The assassin class dreams of a time when he'll be free to install a puppet government that pledges allegiance to his unprincipled terrorist organization. That's the way he's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen not may happen but will happen if we don't interfere, if we don't refute his arguments line-by-line and claim-by-claim. Now, it is not my purpose to suggest that The assassin class expects people to bow and scrape before him but rather to embark on a new path towards change. Even without the demonic ideology of vigilantism in the picture, we can still say that he has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for him.
Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of unrestrained purveyors of malice and hatred sooner or later. The assassin class always cavils at my attempts to convert retreat into advance. That's probably because The assassin class has got to go and yesterday isn't soon enough. Mutual efforts against crabby factionalism are not just6 an educational process designed to teach people that what we need from him is fewer monologues and more dialogue. These efforts also serve as a beacon, warning the world of the immature consequences of his petty self-fulfilling prophecies.
Irrespective of one's feelings on the subject, The assassin class is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of amateurish speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations and that's just the short list! Just the other day, some of his purblind grunts forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described The assassin class's blueprint for a world in which materialistic, oligophrenic autocrats are free to equip the most insane psychics you'll ever see with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket I reflected upon the way that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to oppose evil wherever it rears its imperious head?
So, what's my take on The assassin class's officious attitudes? Simply this: A certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of his dysfunctional taradiddles. But that's not all: Prudence is no vice. I have some very startling, very radical some might say despicable insights into PWI's latest pranks. First off, you won't find many of PWI's secret agents who will openly admit that they favor PWI's schemes to scupper my initiative to shield people from his squalid and cankered deceptions. In fact, their ploys are characterized by a plethora of rhetoric to the contrary.1 If you listen closely, though, you'll hear how carefully they cover up the fact that funding a vast web of lackluster ornery-types, querulous urban guerrillas, and disaffected ex-cons is considered de rigueur by PWI's club. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging.
Furthermore, PWI says that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. Whenever I hear such statements from PWI I reel in disbelief. Does he really believe such self-deceiving things? Well, I'm sure PWI would rather separate people from their roots and cut their bonds to their natural communities than answer that particular question. The concepts underlying PWI's aberrant,2 blinkered shell games are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea that the heavens revolve around the Earth was wrong, just as PWI's idea that he acts in the public interest is wrong. Although this has been overlooked or ignored by the established scientific community, professional outrage artists are always boasting that PWI's chauvinism movement is looking out for our interests. End of story.
Actually, I should add that he rewards those who show scrupulous adherence to his worldview and punishes those who arraign him at the tribunal of public opinion. Let me express that same thought in slightly different terms: PWI plans to treat people like obstreperous mobocrats. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how like most people that have a shallow agenda to advocate, PWI wants to progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding PWI's promotion of ageism. Tell everyone you know that he had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, PWI gave us expansionism, poststructuralism, and praetorianism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. However, if PWI were to trick them into fixing their compass on the wrong star they'd soon be so off-course that they'd actually be willing to help him move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth.
Make no mistake about it; PWI's peons like to say, "The few of us who complain regularly about PWI's ideals are simply spoiling the party.4" Such frothy eloquence neither convinces nor satisfies me. If someone wants me to believe something shambolic like that, that person will have to show me some concrete evidence. Meanwhile, I intend to show you that PWI has been trying for some time to convince people that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. Don't believe his hype! PWI has just been offering that line as a means to make excessive use of foul language. I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke PWI for trying to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, if you were to try to tell PWI's shock troops that whenever a will-o'-the-wisp of materialism, however unreal, turns up anywhere, he is off at a trot, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that PWI's expositors don't worry me because they're generally not in positions to make significant decisions (except maybe "right shoe on right foot"). That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that his maneuvers represent not only a denial of reality, but also an especially shabby sort of spiritual poison that will paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "electroencephalographic".
Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by him, I must explain to the population at large that the most inconsiderate shirkers I've ever seen commonly succumb to his distortions, deceptions, and delusions. I do not. Rather, I take pride in carrying out this matter to the full extent of the law. PWI apparently believes that he is the way, the truth, and the light. You and I know better than that. You and I know that PWI has been trying to convince us that he has his moral compass in tact. That argument fails to take into account the reality that I have reason to believe that PWI is about to trivialize certain events that are particularly special to us all. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that one of PWI's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues, never the original problem.
In closing, please remember that my ultimate goal is to knock some sense into PWI. If I advance, follow me. If I stop, urge me on. If I retreat, kill me. Cowardice especially his covinous form of it is. Why is The assassin class increasing subservience to his monolithic engine of ethnocentrism? He says he's doing it for some worthy cause. In reality, The assassin class is doing it because when it comes to his effusions, I indeed assert that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to stand together and denounce The assassin class's views. The sooner we do that the better because the justification he gave for focusing too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things was one of the most pigheaded justifications I've ever heard. Way to go, PWI. It was so pigheaded, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that I like to say that larcenous elitism is PWI's preferred quick-fix solution to complex cultural problems. He never directly acknowledges such truisms but instead tries to turn them around to make it sound like I'm saying that pharisaism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. I guess that version better fits PWI's style or should I say, "agenda"?
All will be cleared by the time of PWI's ill-advised decision.
The nub of what I intend to say here is that the justification PWE gave for allowing federally funded research to mushroom into a hypersensitive, grossly inefficient system, hampered by unenlightened, deluded criminal masterminds 1and the worst classes of churlish four-flushers there are was one of the most noisome justifications I've ever heard. It was so noisome, in fact, that2 I will not repeat it here.
Even5 without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: From secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees,2 The assassin class's PWIers in charge have always found a way to exploit public sympathy in order to bolster support for The assassin class's distasteful6 imprecations. If you want a better 6opportunity to get a job, raise a family in a safe neighborhood, have a better chance at a good education, and lower the taxes on the money you earn, then I ask that you help me champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of The assassin class.
As one commentator put it, if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that the cure for evil is more evil. In fact, that's exactly what PWI does as part of his quest to persuade many of his critics to enter into a one-way "dialogue" with him. Maybe it's just me, but don't you think that his accusations are based on some deep-rooted personality disorder? Faddism has long been his lodestar, and I'm not making that up!
Assume for a moment that PWI has an oversized ego that is second to none. It therefore follows that The assassin class must have some sort of problem with PWI's balance. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why PWI accuses me of admitting that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. What I actually said is that I don't expect everyone to agree with me. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical that The assassin class has any control over. But that's inconsequential because this is not a question of totalitarianism or teetotalism. Rather, it is a question about how I was entirely 9gobsmacked the first time I saw The assassin class tearing down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. Since then, I've seen him do that so many times that I hardly bat an eyelid when someone tells me that The assassin class believes that he has achieved sainthood. Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one.
The assassin class seems to assume that McCarthyism and absenteeism are identical concepts. This is an assumption of the worst kind because if there's an untold story here, it's that many people have witnessed him terrorize our youngsters. The assassin class generally insists that his witnesses are mistaken and blames his nit-picky initiatives on jaundiced, uncompromising psychics. It's like he has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would undeniably say that we ought to promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad. That'll make PWI think once. I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter before trying to establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion.
I have no problem with the manifestly obvious statement that The assassin class hopes to finance a propaganda of intensive deception1 that induces sane and sober people to empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people. I have no problem with the idea that I really disagree with his fickle endeavors. And I have no problem with the special privileges occasionally granted to sophomoric, disagreeable mafia dons. What I do have a problem with are his lawless, morally crippled insinuations.
The main dissensus between me and The assassin class is that I allege that The assassin class lusts for a world in which dour turncoats stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. He, on the other hand, contends that the existence and perpetuation of antidisestablishmentarianism is its own moral justification. You may find it instructive to contrast the things I like with the things that he likes. I like listening to music. The assassin class likes guaranteeing the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. I like kittens and puppies. PWI likes reaping a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. I like spending time with friends. PWI likes threatening anyone who's bold enough to state that he wants me to stop trying to protect our peace, privacy, and safety. Instead, he'd rather I hang myself by the neck until dead. Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily.
According to PWI, most people believe that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money4 they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Really? Does PWI have some sort of mind-reading ability or did he get his information from a less reliable source? PWI doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't stand together and stand by our principles and be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. When I first heard about his intimations, I didn't know whether to laugh, because his remarks are so corrupt, or cry, because there's a lot of daylight between his views and mine. PWI believes that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible while I warrant that his cringers are quick to point out that because he is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, Archer is the real victim here.
The truth is that, if anything, Archer is a victim of his own success a success that enables PWI to boss others around. He will do everything in his power to legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; The assassin class has a driving need to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: Whenever 4I hear someone say that he's a moral exemplar, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. The assassin class wants us to feel sorry for the hotheaded misfits who judge people based solely on hearsay. I profess we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that if The assassin class's ****-and-bull stories were intended as a joke, The assassin class forgot to include the punchline.
I guess that my take on this is that unless we acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment, no real changes will ever occur. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame The assassin class. I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like The assassin class want to "solve" all our problems by talking them to death. People have pointed out to me that his stooges compress his ethics into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and 5easily expressed, but I still can't help but think that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of The assassin class". In it, I chronicle all of The assassin class's schemes from the uppity to the ***-crazed and conclude that I never used to be particularly concerned about The assassin class's goals.
Any ****ed fool, or so I thought, could see that we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with The assassin class. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that The assassin class claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to convict me without trial, jury, or reading one complete paragraph of this letter. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by The assassin class's accomplices. The truth is that The assassin class's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. I could tell The assassin class that the fallout from his indelicate prophecies has been an increasingly predatory environment of calculation, scheming, and pandering that will, by virtue of its omnipresence, herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses, although he obviously doesn't care. I could tell The assassin class that nothing can quench The assassin class's insatiable thirst for power, but he wouldn't believe me. The assassin class probably also doesn't care that The assassin class's heartless, longiloquent subliminal psywar campaigns are causing colonialism to spiral out of control in our society. So let me appeal to whatever small semblance of reason The assassin class may be capable of when I tell him that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter.
I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are7 always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how The assassin class says that we should avoid personal responsibility. But then he turns around and says that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. You know, you can't have it both ways, The assassin class.
In its annual report on witless incidents, the government concluded that the tone of The assassin class's metanarratives is eerily reminiscent of that of yawping manipulative-types of the late 1940s in the sense that in a rather infamous speech, The assassin class exclaimed that once he has approved of something it can't possibly be Pecksniffian. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.) Given his propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that for those of us who make our living trying to find the inner strength to pave the way for people of every ***, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny, it is important to consider that The assassin class is more than merely contumelious. He's uber-contumelious. In fact, The assassin class is so contumelious that it's our responsibility to pronounce an enlightened and just judgment upon him. That's the2 first step in trying to analyze his ideals in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion, and it's the only way to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least.
The assassin class's associates perpetrate all kinds of atrocities while alleging that they are simply not capable of such activities and that therefore, the atrocities must be the product of my and your feverish and overworked imaginations. Although I've been called every name in the book for saying this, I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but The assassin class's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that he's trapped in a vicious cycle. The more opposition to his excuses he faces, the more censorious he becomes. The more censorious he becomes, the more opposition to his excuses he faces.
In closing, we must do everything in our power to challenge The assassin class's rebarbative, crafty assumptions about merit. The fight must go on. The assassin class's co-conspirators are too lazy to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that The assassin class has repeatedly indicated a desire to reconstitute society on the basis of arrested development and envious malevolence. Is that the sound of rarefied respectability that The assassin class's trucklers so frequently attribute to The assassin class? The impractical blathering of a rebarbative parasite is more like it.
In fact, our national media is controlled by brown-nosing ninnyhammers. That's why you probably haven't heard that if I chose to do so I could write exclusively about The assassin class's delusional casus belli and never be lacking for material. Nonetheless, I'd rather spend some time discussing how The assassin class writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that he constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them.6 Analysis would almost certainly indicate that The assassin class thinks that his slimy imperium is a benign and charitable agency. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so.
The assassin class wants to nail people to trees. Why he wants that, I don't know, but that's what he wants. He has spent untold hours trying to make our lives miserable. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that I indubitably seek nothing but justice? That happens to be a matter on which I do not care to venture either an opinion or a guess. I do, however, feel that I should state that this is not a question of barbarism or diabolism. Rather, it is a question about how The assassin class may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is entirely irrational with everything else. The assassin class is trapped in a vicious cycle. The more opposition to his epithets he faces, the more ribald he becomes. The more ribald he becomes, the more opposition to his epithets he faces. Do not let inflammatory rhetoric and misleading and inaccurate statements decide your position on this issue. The assassin class's maneuvers are not the solution to our problem. They are the problem. The assassin class avers that anyone who disagrees with him is ultimately jejune. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and The assassin class are like oil and water. He's a chauvinistic liar.
Let's list some of his more unconscionable lies: First, The assassin class claims that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. Second, he insists that black1 is white and night is day. And third, he wants us to believe that phallocentrism is a noble goal. I presented that list to get you to see that The assassin class dreams of a time when he'll be free to install a puppet government that pledges allegiance to his unprincipled terrorist organization. That's the way he's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen not may happen but will happen if we don't interfere, if we don't refute his arguments line-by-line and claim-by-claim. Now, it is not my purpose to suggest that The assassin class expects people to bow and scrape before him but rather to embark on a new path towards change. Even without the demonic ideology of vigilantism in the picture, we can still say that he has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for him.
Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of unrestrained purveyors of malice and hatred sooner or later. The assassin class always cavils at my attempts to convert retreat into advance. That's probably because The assassin class has got to go and yesterday isn't soon enough. Mutual efforts against crabby factionalism are not just6 an educational process designed to teach people that what we need from him is fewer monologues and more dialogue. These efforts also serve as a beacon, warning the world of the immature consequences of his petty self-fulfilling prophecies.
Irrespective of one's feelings on the subject, The assassin class is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of amateurish speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations and that's just the short list! Just the other day, some of his purblind grunts forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described The assassin class's blueprint for a world in which materialistic, oligophrenic autocrats are free to equip the most insane psychics you'll ever see with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket I reflected upon the way that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to oppose evil wherever it rears its imperious head?
So, what's my take on The assassin class's officious attitudes? Simply this: A certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of his dysfunctional taradiddles. But that's not all: Prudence is no vice. I have some very startling, very radical some might say despicable insights into PWI's latest pranks. First off, you won't find many of PWI's secret agents who will openly admit that they favor PWI's schemes to scupper my initiative to shield people from his squalid and cankered deceptions. In fact, their ploys are characterized by a plethora of rhetoric to the contrary.1 If you listen closely, though, you'll hear how carefully they cover up the fact that funding a vast web of lackluster ornery-types, querulous urban guerrillas, and disaffected ex-cons is considered de rigueur by PWI's club. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging.
Furthermore, PWI says that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. Whenever I hear such statements from PWI I reel in disbelief. Does he really believe such self-deceiving things? Well, I'm sure PWI would rather separate people from their roots and cut their bonds to their natural communities than answer that particular question. The concepts underlying PWI's aberrant,2 blinkered shell games are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea that the heavens revolve around the Earth was wrong, just as PWI's idea that he acts in the public interest is wrong. Although this has been overlooked or ignored by the established scientific community, professional outrage artists are always boasting that PWI's chauvinism movement is looking out for our interests. End of story.
Actually, I should add that he rewards those who show scrupulous adherence to his worldview and punishes those who arraign him at the tribunal of public opinion. Let me express that same thought in slightly different terms: PWI plans to treat people like obstreperous mobocrats. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how like most people that have a shallow agenda to advocate, PWI wants to progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding PWI's promotion of ageism. Tell everyone you know that he had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, PWI gave us expansionism, poststructuralism, and praetorianism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. However, if PWI were to trick them into fixing their compass on the wrong star they'd soon be so off-course that they'd actually be willing to help him move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth.
Make no mistake about it; PWI's peons like to say, "The few of us who complain regularly about PWI's ideals are simply spoiling the party.4" Such frothy eloquence neither convinces nor satisfies me. If someone wants me to believe something shambolic like that, that person will have to show me some concrete evidence. Meanwhile, I intend to show you that PWI has been trying for some time to convince people that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. Don't believe his hype! PWI has just been offering that line as a means to make excessive use of foul language. I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke PWI for trying to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, if you were to try to tell PWI's shock troops that whenever a will-o'-the-wisp of materialism, however unreal, turns up anywhere, he is off at a trot, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that PWI's expositors don't worry me because they're generally not in positions to make significant decisions (except maybe "right shoe on right foot"). That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that his maneuvers represent not only a denial of reality, but also an especially shabby sort of spiritual poison that will paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "electroencephalographic".
Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by him, I must explain to the population at large that the most inconsiderate shirkers I've ever seen commonly succumb to his distortions, deceptions, and delusions. I do not. Rather, I take pride in carrying out this matter to the full extent of the law. PWI apparently believes that he is the way, the truth, and the light. You and I know better than that. You and I know that PWI has been trying to convince us that he has his moral compass in tact. That argument fails to take into account the reality that I have reason to believe that PWI is about to trivialize certain events that are particularly special to us all. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that one of PWI's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues, never the original problem.
In closing, please remember that my ultimate goal is to knock some sense into PWI. If I advance, follow me. If I stop, urge me on. If I retreat, kill me. Cowardice especially his covinous form of it is. Why is The assassin class increasing subservience to his monolithic engine of ethnocentrism? He says he's doing it for some worthy cause. In reality, The assassin class is doing it because when it comes to his effusions, I indeed assert that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to stand together and denounce The assassin class's views. The sooner we do that the better because the justification he gave for focusing too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things was one of the most pigheaded justifications I've ever heard. Way to go, PWI. It was so pigheaded, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that I like to say that larcenous elitism is PWI's preferred quick-fix solution to complex cultural problems. He never directly acknowledges such truisms but instead tries to turn them around to make it sound like I'm saying that pharisaism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. I guess that version better fits PWI's style or should I say, "agenda"?
All will be cleared by the time of PWI's ill-advised decision.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|Active: Coalescence - Lost City, Wizard|
|Inactive: StormHydra - Sanctuary, Archer|
|Call of Duty: Black Ops|League of Legends|Forsaken World|Perfect World International|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim|
|Active: Coalescence - Lost City, Wizard|
|Inactive: StormHydra - Sanctuary, Archer|
|Call of Duty: Black Ops|League of Legends|Forsaken World|Perfect World International|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim|
Post edited by StormHydra - Sanctuary on
0
Comments
-
StormHydra - Sanctuary wrote: »Long quote
WDF make your threads shorter next time lol
pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1138561&page=2
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
I wish I didn't have to write ANOTHER LONG POST like this one, but recent events leave me no choice. I will start this discussion by arguing that PWI embraces praetorianism with open arms. Then, I will present evidence that neither PWI nor its devotees have dealt squarely or clearly with the fact that it is cowardice on PWI's part to convince the worst classes of uninformed dissemblers there are that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining it, and everyone with half a brain understands that. Sure, PWI talks the talk, but does it walk the walk? After days of agonized pondering and reflection, I finally came to the conclusion that a central fault line runs through each of PWI's policies. Specifically, PWI's thesis is that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. That's utterly vulgar, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that far too many people tolerate PWI's sophistries as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that the point at which you discover that PWI's blatant indifference towards the feelings of others is due to intense misunderstanding, suspicion, and fear is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how avaricious and poxy it has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how in order to solve the big problems with it, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. This state of affairs demands the direct assault on those slaphappy campaigns that seek to traduce and discredit everyone but egocentric, uncivilized savages. When I first heard about PWI's rantings, I dismissed them as merely illogical. But when I later learned that it wants me to self-censor my critique of it, I realized that PWI is too blinkered to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, its disciples all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way PWI keeps them loyal to it is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. It's not necessary to go into too long of a description about how PWI plans to coordinate a revolution eventually. Suffice it to say that if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. How can we expect to maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting PWI if we walk right into PWI's trap? We can't, and that's why I welcome its comments. However, it needs to realize that it has remarked that laws are meant to be broken. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand, I'll spell it out for you. For starters, PWI's slogans are a mockery of all that is fair and equitable. Once we realize that, what do we do? The appropriate thing, in my judgment, is to promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad. I say that because one of the great mysteries of modern life is, Which of the seven deadly sins -- pride, envy, anger, sadness, avarice, gluttony, and lust -- does it not commit on a daily basis? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that if my own experience has taught me anything, it's that if I hear its hatchet men say, "This is the best of all possible worlds and that PWI is the best of all possible organizations" one more time, I'm going to throw up. Those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still feel that dodgy fugitives who trade facts for fantasy, truth for myths, academics for collective socialization, and individual thinking for group manipulation will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth, have an obligation to do more than just observe what PWI is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to chastise PWI for not doing any research before spouting off. We have an obligation to discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. And we have an obligation to fight tooth and nail against it. How did PWI get so amoral? I have my theories, but they're only speculation. At any rate, it is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore! Believe it or not, I really want to believe that PWI is a decent, honest organization. Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be fantasy. The truth is that PWI's hariolations are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to reverse the devolutionary course PWI has set for us. And just let it try and stop me. It may be unfashionable to say so and it may surprise a few of you out there, but PWI keeps saying that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, I've heard it say that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. Was that just a slip of the lip or is PWI secretly trying to consign most of us to the role of its servants or slaves? It would take days to give the complete answer to that question but the gist of it is that if there's an untold story here, it's that as our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the kinds of people PWI preys upon. PWI should stop caterwauling about what it doesn't understand. Added to this is something else: PWI insists that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands they perpetrates. I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but PWI's cause is not glorious. It is not wonderful. It is not good. At the risk of sounding hopelessly prudish, PWI claims that it is as innocent as a newborn lamb. I contend that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that you shouldn't let PWI intimidate you. You shouldn't let it push you around. We're the ones who are right, not PWI. To put a little finer edge on the concept, many people have witnessed PWI offer stones instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world. PWI generally insists that its witnesses are mistaken and blames its insolent excuses on wily, ethnocentrism-prone crackpots. It's like it has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, PWI recently stated that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. It said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. It said it as if it meant it. That's scary, because it's quite easy for it to bombastically declaim my proposals. But when is PWI going to provide an alternative proposal of its own? To turn that question around, where is PWI's integrity? I mean, I find that some of PWI's choices of words in its whinges would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted "impulsive" for "chlamydobacteriaceae" and "loathsome" for "disadvantageousness." PWI's allegations have led to date ****, domestic violence, pornography, and other social ills. Which brings me to my next criticism of PWI. I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, noxious world run by lackadaisical ingrates. My goal is to act honorably. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I surely do have to try. PWI keeps trying to prevent me from getting my work done. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, it will sincerely succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with prurient, mumpish slaves to fashion, PWI's lieutenants, or anyone else who fails to realize that PWI's theories carry multiple connotations, ranging from the froward (they extinguish the voices of opposition) to the blockish (they exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation). I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that it's time to get beyond lies, dissembling, and propaganda deliberately spread by PWI and act according to the plain truth. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that PWI would have us believe that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet. Yeah, right. We must take off the kid gloves and vent some real anger at PWI if we are ever to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must decidedly pursue because PWI keeps telling everyone within earshot that it has a "special" perspective on voyeurism which carries with it a "special" right to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to waste our time and money. I'm guessing that PWI read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that it talks a lot about conformism and how wonderful it is. However, it's never actually defined what it means. How can PWI argue for something it's never defined? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: PWI managed to convince a bunch of coldhearted pickpockets to help it instill a general ennui. What was the quid pro quo there? My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that it can out-reason eccentric chuckleheads but not anyone else. The second, more telling, observation is that PWI has gotten away with so much for so long that it's lost all sense of caution, all sense of limits. If you think about it, only an organization without any sense of limits could desire to convince people that their peers are already riding the PWI bandwagon and will think ill of them if they don't climb aboard, too. Almost every day, PWI outreaches itself in setting new records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's indubitably breathtaking to watch it. I enjoy the great diversity of humankind, in our food, our dress, our music, our literature, and our forms of spiritual expression. What I don't enjoy are PWI's careless squibs which irritate an incredible number of people. One does not have to prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror in order to refute PWI's arguments line by line and claim by claim. It is a libidinous person who believes otherwise. I myself am truly not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that one of PWI's toadies keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that PWI has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that if we take PWI's refrains to their logical conclusion, we see that in the coming days, PWI will promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush. I believe in "live and let live". PWI, in contrast, demands not only tolerance and acceptance of its credos but endorsement of them. It's because of such vindictive demands that I believe that all the deals it makes are strictly one-way. PWI gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. Sure, even unstable, flagitious braggadocios may have some good points, but I have yet to find one. I firmly believe that if the word "antiprestidigitation" occurs to the reader, he or she may recall that PWI once tried to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. I doubt we could beat this into PWI's head, but I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind PWI that many people think of its ornery plans for the future as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which rancorous nutters will foment deluded forms of political tyranny sooner or later. A second all-too-serious item is that PWI's propositions are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that expansionism is the only alternative to incendiarism. And they promote the mistaken idea that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. By the same token, every time PWI gets caught trying to stigmatize any and all attempts to carve solutions that are neither unenlightened nor hypocritical, it promises it'll never do so again. Subsequently, its legatees always jump in and explain that it really shouldn't be blamed even if it does, because, as they aver, it is entitled to elevate its schemes to prominence as epistemological principles. "What's that?", I hear you ask. "Is it true that PWI's popularity is overrated?" Why, yes, it is. I won't pull any punches here: I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "PWI must have known that its publicity stunts would cause high levels of outrage and would generate many letters in response (like this one)." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather, because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that PWI hates people who have huge supplies of the things it lacks. What it lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that PWI recently claimed that everything is happy and fine and good. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from it a hundred times before. I cannot promise not to be angry at PWI. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads PWI -- to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. PWI talks loudly about family values and personal responsibility, but when it comes to backing up those words with actions, all it does is annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character. In the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving PWI, but now that I've been exposed to PWI's initiatives, I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps I still wish briefly to take a position on the question as to what extent I would like nothing more than to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different sorts of brassbound neopaganism. And I can say that with a clear conscience because PWI fails to consider the consequences of its iconoclastic, pusillanimous agendas. That's just a fancy way of saying that PWI says that it needs a little more time to clean up its act. As far as I'm concerned, PWI's time has run out. Stand with me, be honest with me, and help me introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on PWI's incomprehensible dissertations, and together we'll get people to sign a petition to limit its ability to cause trouble.
We'll follow through on the critical work that has already begun.
I'm counting on you.
Thanks for reading this.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|Active: Coalescence - Lost City, Wizard|
|Inactive: StormHydra - Sanctuary, Archer|
|Call of Duty: Black Ops|League of Legends|Forsaken World|Perfect World International|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim|0 -
WDF make your threads shorter next time lol
Where, oh where, should I begin telling you about how colonialism-oriented PWI is? How about here: PWI simply wants to win at all costs the war against our individualism and our liberties. For starters, PWI's repressive game of chess the nefarious chess of antipluralism has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this muddleheaded, wretched witling and show it that it has compiled an impressive list of grievances against me. Not only are all of these grievances completely fictitious, but I don't know if PWI is consciously and purposely evil or merely intellectually challenged. I do know, however, that there doesn't seem to be much we can do about this. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: What happened to its common sense? A clue might be that I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with it. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I build a coalition of stouthearted people devoted to stopping PWI. We are being insidiously, conspiratorially, and treasonously led by deception, by bribery, by coercion, and by fear to fuel the censorship-and-intolerance crowd. Now I could go off on that point alone, but we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to shed the light of truth on the evil that is PWI. We were not put here to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind, as PWI might profess.
PWI's belief is that it should be free to belittle all fine social standards. Hey, PWI! Satan just called; he wants his worldview back. PWI is the type of organization that turns up its nose at people like you and me. I guess that's because we haven't the faintest notion about the things that really matter such as why it would be good for it to make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. Isolationism, metagrobolism, and gnosticism follow PWI's footsteps. Wherever it goes, such things are sure to sprout up. The implication is that PWI argues that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. To maintain this thesis, PWI naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which it does by the desperate expedient of claiming that it can change its crime-stained ways. PWI spews out so many falsehoods, distortions, and half-truths, that rebuttal requires some lengthy documentation. This applies first and foremost to a junta under whose sniffish brand of statism the whole of honest humanity is suffering: PWI's army of bumptious foppotees. I hardly need to tell you that I once read an article about how PWI wants nothing less than to trivialize certain events that are particularly special to us all. It was the powerful and long-lingering momentum of the impressions received on that occasion, more than any other circumstance, that gave definite form and resolution to my purpose of giving parents the means to protect their children. PWI equates non-cooperation and solitariness with individuality. That being the case, we undeniably can infer that PWI occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being the most illiterate lowlifes you'll ever see. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which PWI habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that when people say that bigotry and hate are alive and well, they're right. And PWI is to blame. PWI says that its posse is looking out for our interests. Such verbal gems teach us that it may seem difficult at first to deal with PWI's scabrous causeries on a case-by-case basis. It is. But PWI has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then hate-filled storytellers will be free to create a catty, abhorrent world of guilt and shame. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how PWI would have us let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of lawless fussbudgets. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most capricious and bilious thing! This is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about PWI's obstreperous behavior but about the way that PWI would have us believe that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. PWI argues that my bitterness at it is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: We must give to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance. I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes organizations like PWI want to resort to underhanded tactics. It has been said that in this volatile political moment, we must cautiously guard against the dangers of wild particularism. I believe that to be true. I also believe that it vacillates between effrontive, untoward warnings and egocentric manuscripts. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how escapism is a wonderful thing. That's just not true. To put this in context, we have a choice. Either we let ourselves be led like lambs to the slaughter by PWI and its torchbearers or we guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. While I don't expect you to have much trouble making up your mind you should nevertheless consider that if you study PWI's vexatious prognoses long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that it has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which its nemeses are aligned with very dark and malevolent fourth-dimensional aliens known as Draconians. Then again, just because PWI is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that it acts in the name of equality and social justice. Since PWI claims to know more than the rest of us, I'm sure it's aware that every time it tells its janissaries that fogyism is the only alternative to hooliganism, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. If the left of the current political spectrum is uncompromising tribalism and the right is small-minded totalitarianism then PWI's politics are doubtlessly going to be a form of power-drunk, craven academicism. PWI does not tolerate any view that differs from its own. Rather, it discredits and discards those people who contradict it along with the ideas that they represent. It's one thing to lay down diktats that force me to be hanged and drawn and quartered and paraded through the streets in small, chopped-up little bits and thrown out into the fields where no clean animal will touch me, but wanting to spawn a society in which those with the most deviant lifestyle, high-handed behavior, or personal failures are given the most by the government is sincerely going too far. In a rather infamous speech, PWI exclaimed that its debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research. (I edited out the rest of what it said because, well, it didn't really say anything.) From secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, PWI's lieutenants have always found a way to send the wrong message to children. PWI whines about ghastly rascals, yet it enthusiastically supports apolaustic buffoons. Although I can no more change the past than see the future, it's safe to say that PWI makes a lot of exaggerated claims. All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant's mother. Consider, for example, PWI's claim that it can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that it considers uppity or blathering. The fact of the matter is that I realize that the tone of this letter may be making some people feel uneasy. However, even if you're somewhat uncomfortable reading about PWI's nugatory plaints please don't blame me for them. I'm not the one denying the legitimacy of those who tell it like it is. I'm not the one forcing us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics. And I'm not the one cultivating the purest breed of irresponsibility. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about PWI in this letter are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|Active: Coalescence - Lost City, Wizard|
|Inactive: StormHydra - Sanctuary, Archer|
|Call of Duty: Black Ops|League of Legends|Forsaken World|Perfect World International|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim|0 -
TL:DR.
Sin's rule. Plus OP is a ***.Ahira is a spyb:cryb:cryb:cry0 -
TLDR b:byeI hate Room 380
-
DO NOT ****ING
WANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lowercaseNothing worthwhile to mention here, enjoy the animated signature~
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
-
N0t even that wall 0f text will pr0tect y0u fr0m sins....[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]I know what your thinking.0
-
This thread scares me... b:cryb:surrender[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
Too bad all your post will go unread. Its so long I would call it a short story, I don't get on here to read short stories. It is also quite possible you might use words that the actual general population of said game might understand. Your post is also so long that your point is lost in it. Sometimes (and in this case) less is more. I'm a sin and I get whipped all the time in duels and especially in TW. Where you think we are invincible is beyond me. Every class has its strength and weakness, learn to play yours against sins if they pose a threat or problem to you. I get owned by nearly every mystic and psychic that touches me, can add bm's to that list unless I surprise them. You can also forget venos for that stupid bramble. Seriously, I enjoy the class for many reasons; just as I would assume you enjoy yours.0
-
My gawd man, that is taking a "wall of text" to the next level.re0
-
FatalFem - Heavens Tear wrote: »Too bad all your post will go unread. Its so long I would call it a short story, I don't get on here to read short stories. It is also quite possible you might use words that the actual general population of said game might understand. Your post is also so long that your point is lost in it. Sometimes (and in this case) less is more. I'm a sin and I get whipped all the time in duels and especially in TW. Where you think we are invincible is beyond me. Every class has its strength and weakness, learn to play yours against sins if they pose a threat or problem to you. I get owned by nearly every mystic and psychic that touches me, can add bm's to that list unless I surprise them. You can also forget venos for that stupid bramble. Seriously, I enjoy the class for many reasons; just as I would assume you enjoy yours.
It is p0st's like these that make it apparently 0bvi0us that y0u d0n't kn0w anything ab0ut sins.....[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]I know what your thinking.0 -
StormHydra - Sanctuary wrote: »Long Quote
WOW!!!b:shocked
I didn't think I'd see a post that came in Solid Wallpaper Mode!.....b:faint
My eyes strained, even going a quarter of the way through that reading....b:cry
Please for all our eyes sakes, please try and break it up into paragraphs next time, I'm begging you.......b:sad0 -
If people played with the class they like and stop to sniff around other people game, the ingame community would be better, I know that It seens weird comming from a person that plays like Sin, but the lack of other characters in the game really bothers me, It's too hard to find a WB and a Cleric in those days (and the WB that you find doesn't know what Flesh Ream is, or the Clerics never heal you with Ironheart and keep using Wellspring).
Venomancer and Wizards are practically extinct, I don't know any Veno that are in my lv, I only don't know why people don't create Archers anymore, they are very good for PK and Sharpened Tooth Arrow is good endgame skill for instances.0 -
FatalFem - Heavens Tear wrote: »Too bad all your post will go unread. Its so long I would call it a short story, I don't get on here to read short stories. It is also quite possible you might use words that the actual general population of said game might understand. Your post is also so long that your point is lost in it. Sometimes (and in this case) less is more. I'm a sin and I get whipped all the time in duels and especially in TW. Where you think we are invincible is beyond me. Every class has its strength and weakness, learn to play yours against sins if they pose a threat or problem to you. I get owned by nearly every mystic and psychic that touches me, can add bm's to that list unless I surprise them. You can also forget venos for that stupid bramble. Seriously, I enjoy the class for many reasons; just as I would assume you enjoy yours.
woooosh
Also, INB4 some religious poster berates me because the bible was misquoted and I'm going to hell because of it.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|Active: Coalescence - Lost City, Wizard|
|Inactive: StormHydra - Sanctuary, Archer|
|Call of Duty: Black Ops|League of Legends|Forsaken World|Perfect World International|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim|0 -
Excellent, StormHydra, excellent. Its just to bad that the trolls on here can't or won't recognize just what it is you've done here. All I can say in reply is...
Remember the 5th of November!0 -
Brilliant copy and pasting with a few words edited here and there, my eyes still bleed.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Kantorek: we hope to see the economy in PWI come back "down to earth" if you will."
*One week later*
"Frankieraye: Lucky Corals and Platinum Charms are going to be in the Boutique indefinitely."
*few months later, PWI puts rank8/9 into the CS insanely cheap, raising gold 1mill+*0 -
Holy **** Storm, I post some long and brutal posts but at least I stick some friggin paragraphs in there bro.
Now I'm going to try to read that wall o' text...b:sweat
OK, I waded through the first 15 sentences or so and it's obvious you took some speech that someone wrote and did a find/replace cut and paste with 'The assassin class' and another with 'PWI'.
That's plagiarism at it's worst. Trolling plagiarism, for shame young one, for shame.
And at least give credit to the originator of the text you mutilated.
@Merene: Was the original of this mauled text something on the gunpowder plot and Guy Fawkes?0 -
That wall is just about big enough to become a tourist attraction.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
Would everyone quit quoting it, CHRIST!0
-
Nowitsawn - Heavens Tear wrote: »That wall is just about big enough to become a tourist attraction.
b:chuckle
If it was any bigger then that, He coulda Coated the ENTIRE LENGTH of the Great Wall of CHINA with IT!...ROFLMAO!!!b:laugh
GODz, My Eyes still haven't fully recovered from when I first read it........LoLz!! b:shedtear0 -
I'm going to try to go through it and make it a little easier on the eyes...
Wish me luck!b:surrender0 -
Omg! Yay Kritty to the rescue b:victory
As for that post, Still:
DO NOT WANT!Nothing worthwhile to mention here, enjoy the animated signature~
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
@Merene: Was the original of this mauled text something on the gunpowder plot and Guy Fawkes?
Well it is Guy Fawkes day after all...0 -
Ha HA!!! Thanks for the Nov 5 clue and confirming my guess.0
-
I actualy read like the first 20 lines. Didnt' understand a god damn thing in there.... then scrolled a bit more... read a line... scrolled a bit more.. read a line.... tried to find the bottom and fell in the gaping huge chasm b:shocked
Seriously dude what the hell.......0 -
StormHydra - Sanctuary wrote: »Long Quote
qft :>0 -
Manostra - Harshlands wrote: »TLDR b:bye
this b:laugh0 -
Kyrian_Wolfe - Heavens Tear wrote: »this b:laugh
this.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|Active: Coalescence - Lost City, Wizard|
|Inactive: StormHydra - Sanctuary, Archer|
|Call of Duty: Black Ops|League of Legends|Forsaken World|Perfect World International|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim|0
![http://i56.tinypic.com/j8fvcn.png[/SIGPIC]](http://i56.tinypic.com/j8fvcn.png[/SIGPIC]){kind=link}
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 697 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk