Cleric vs Wizard self buffs in pk

So I was having many debates with various faction mates about a wizard vs a cleric 1v1 in open pk and who has the 'edge' under self buffs only.

Now I am a 101 sage wiz n 101 demon cleric with acc stashed gear (g15 wep +10, tt/lunar nirv armour etc etc)

Wiz is 6.4k hp n 6.2k pdef 10+k mag def 14.6-16.4k mag attack self buffed (dex genie with spark BoC, EP, fortify expel, and holy path)

Cleric is 7.6k hp n 5.4k pdef and 14k mag def self 16.4-18.5k mag attack (demon spirit gifted) self buffed (str genie with occ ice, ToP, holy path, EP, fortify, and expel)

I pk on both regularly and both are fun to use and have natural str n weakness vs other classes and it is my belief that under self buffs appoc charmed etc a wiz has a slight upper hand in 1v1 pk vs a cleric (with full buffs wiz >> cleric)

I feel this way for several reasons, one is that vs r8+10 Op geared ppl on my cleric, i hav a very very hard time killing a wiz due to silent seal being obsolete, occ ice range issues, wiz range > cleric range and clerics lack a sutra or 0s channel spell or as powerful a debuff as undine (clerics hav to spend time puri their debuff or we get *****)

Also, the only way to beat sutra as a cleric is to genie AD or sleep or Guardian light and sutra cs = 2min, GL = 3 mins and AD is 3 mins, so im SoL there wings of prot will save 1 spell of the 4 chain sutra which is always accompanied by spark n undine + maybe EP, also when a wiz sutras they gain back like 50+ chi and can sleep BT right after (or +50 chi and elemental shell for 15 more chi)

Also vs wizards who aint 1shot cs r8 with no armour, phys attacks r pointless due to pdef and wieled thunder is 200% wep dmg, n much less extra dmg added (though metal debuff is nice is demon) compared to sage sandstorm (300% wep dmg n like +5.6k dmg or so) or divine pyro (another 300% wep dmg) under sutra

Also wiz has BT which is 2x base dmg (which is a lot if u hav my wep) n total 400% wep dmg +~12k while demon tempest is 400% + base + 14k so cleric aoe 2spark wont do nearly as much dmg (though a cleric can eat a phys def charm to help alleviate the dmg, but still its alot) though sage bids can b used for crit but i tend to use BT for the raw dmg instead of gambling on 50% chance to 46% crit so thats like 25% chance to crit only and less dmg if no crit

In general, I need a lucky crit or catchin the wiz not eating crab meat n sleep at 60% hp n tempest through charm and imo demon sparking with my cleric is just pointless as a wiz can DS away n kite till it runs out n then i dun hav chi to tempest or GL or WoP, naturally i burn the wiz chi but still hard as a wiz can chi quite quickly

A cleric can at most stack 35% mag debuff, 30% metal debuff and +20% EP but then if no tempest, only cyclone can b used as wield thunder is in cd compared to a wiz undine of 60% and genie spell spark which will bring my fire def down to maybe 4k? idk but its very low

Im jus wondering what all u pro pk wizards think and if u agree that a wiz > cleric 1v1 pk