r9 chip opening ...

Escorian - Dreamweaver wrote: »

ok if it were you then another reason you would not know if they tried to contact you would be you would have replied thus they would not have banned you ty gg have fun. b:bye

the OP was wrong of why the account was banned -- hense the argument was invalid to begin with, my argument towards the autoclickers will always stand ^^ but like i said before, it is not bannable

you shouldnt argue with someone that knows more than you-- but by forums rules is not allowed to discuss their ban

Escorian - Dreamweaver wrote: »

autoclickers are too bannable lol.

whatever you say sir b:bye

Mendolin - Sanctuary wrote: »

whatever you say sir b:bye

lol need proof frankie even stated this in another thread.

frankieraye wrote: »

There's also this:

(l) Using or exploiting any bugs, errors, or design flaws to obtain unauthorized access to the Service or to gain an unfair advantage over other players,

edit:

adding some more quotes

PWE may amend these Terms, the Rules of Conduct, and any EULA at any time in our sole discretion. Amendments and modifications will be effective immediately after publishing them on the Website or otherwise providing you a copy thereof, and you waive any right you may have to receive specific notice of such changes or modifications. You agree to and are responsible for checking this Agreement, the Rules of Conduct and any EULA periodically so you will be familiar with their contents as they may be amended or modified from time to time. By continuing to use any portion of the Service, you are signifying your acceptance of any revised or updated terms. If you do not agree to the amended terms, you must stop using the Service.

Without limiting the foregoing, in addition to the User Content rules set forth in Section 10 above, you agree not to take any of the following actions:...

...(k) Cheat or utilize unauthorized exploits in connection with the Games or the Service;

@Mendolin: How can you seriously say you're right and keep a straight face? The banning of accounts is not up to your discretion, and within that discretion, there needn't be reason other than a GM felt it was justified. Hell, they don't even need to go that far.

It is freely decided by the company and the GMs what is or is not bannable, and that can be changed according to either party's discretion.

The simple fact is what you are arguing is not only wrong, because this account was banned because of a 3rd party tool, so therefore, precedence says it is a bannable offense, but furthermore, this argument in general is trivial as it is not up to you or any of us to decide what is or is not bannable.

It is akin to a drunk pulled over for drunk driving arguing with the cop that he didn't do anything illegal.

Escorian - Dreamweaver wrote: »

lol need proof frankie even stated this in another thread.

your quote from frankie was to multi-clienting... lol which i agree is bannable

Feynira - Sanctuary wrote: »

@Mendolin: How can you seriously say you're right and keep a straight face? The banning of accounts is not up to your discretion, and within that discretion, there needn't be reason other than a GM felt it was justified. Hell, they don't even need to go that far.

It is freely decided by the company and the GMs what is or is not bannable, and that can be changed according to either party's discretion.

The simple fact is what you are arguing is not only wrong, because this account was banned because of a 3rd party tool, so therefore, precedence says it is a bannable offense, but furthermore, this argument in general is trivial as it is not up to you or any of us to decide what is or is not bannable.

It is akin to a drunk pulled over for drunk driving arguing with the cop that he didn't do anything illegal.

tempy was talking about my accounts... he was mistaken on the reason... but keep argueing about something you know nothing about-- i will not discuss my ban on the forums as it is against forum rules

edit: ps- i am willing to bet no one has been banned from pwi because they were using an autoclicker

Feynira - Sanctuary wrote: »

What I'm discussing is that your opinion doesn't matter. Because it all falls to someone of authority. It doesn't matter what the offense is. If it gets someone banned, it is now precedence, and that precedence says it is a bannable offense.

If I got banned from the game for speaking in binary in the World Chat (assuming that has never happened before), it is from that point on considered a bannable offense. That is how precedence works, at least until a GM acknowledges a second case and does not ban the person. Then things aren't so clear-cut.

b:cute everyone's opinion matters- it is all relative, just like you think that it doesnt... because you are convinced you are right no?
as stated in this thread before- you can get banned for whatever reason they throw at you... people are just making their argument as to why it shouldnt be so...

my arguement in the first place wasnt with you-- it was with someone that was accusing me of assuming when they themselves were assuming
i dont think i was arguing the reason for my ban lol... only autoclickers- and since that wasnt the reason for the ban... that means all these opinions/arguements are invalid anyways xD

feel free and continue if you feel necessary

Templar - Sanctuary wrote: »

So today i find that one of my guildy's alt account beeing baned for auto chip opening.

Can a gm explain here why? i mean ofc. that i don't support using 3rd party on game but you guys forced people to do. You put chips in sale that can't be opened like rank badges 100 each and then people trying to find all posible ways of opening it . and then you ban person who's been supporting you buying boutique items.

I don't see logic there, its like digging own grave.

So easy solution there is a npc at 1k stream and a lot of people doesn't whana no life clicking 24/7 or auto clicker or jamming buttons ( and its bannable doh ). just spend 5min time and reprogram 1k npc.


b:bye big greetings for gm/dev.

The obvious solution for your friend is play another game or have to actually work his fingers for his R9. Of course, I'm saying that and I'd still use my keyboard's auto/rapid fire buttons and go afk if I ever bothered with R9 (which I likely won't anyways) and opening chip packs. PWI can bite me if they wanna treat something as insignificant as that as botting, especially when one has to reduce repetitive actions to prevent an onset of carpel tunnel.

No point argueing about bans since if PWI wish it everything is bannable.

So... Now that it's established that using auto-clickers is ok, does anyone know of a good one to use? I've tried a few but for some reason the clicks aren't working on PWI =/

EithneEtain - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Come on people-grow up. Ninety-nine percent of on-line games have the same rule and the purpose of that rule is to make things fair for everyone. If you don't lke it, don't play

quoted the wrong person?

Zolyph - Sanctuary wrote: »

So... Now that it's established that using auto-clickers is ok, does anyone know of a good one to use? I've tried a few but for some reason the clicks aren't working on PWI =/

I used TypeItIn, you can use it free for 30 days or something...
Here is the script that I used:

{repeat 1000000,{F8}{Delay 3500}y}

F8 is the shortcut where you have your packs
Delay 3500 is a 3,5 sec delay between openings.. Try a value from 2000-4000, depends on how fast server can finish quest.. I put an 'y' at the end of the script to get rid of any popups if server are to slow to open packs at your rate... If to many popups, try to adjust the Delay value.

BigFIuffy - Archosaur wrote: »

looool this thread is hilarious, someone actually posting something allow the lines of "you can not ban me, I am a cashshopper".

reading comprehension fail

R9 is a joke.