y so srs?

I like your sig, epros.

WnbTank - Archosaur wrote: »

I thought the name TrollingTides had already picked up, even on our dead subforums.

True Story b:chuckle

Raging **** works just as well b:surrender

As if i care whether u like it or not.......

gtfo back to RT b:bye

Well, dear Epros without any doubt you want to provoque an inflammation and many posts replying to your provocation. You will certainly get what do you wanted.. but let me reply to you in the way which won't satisfy your needs, but maybe make you think about slightly different aspects of the things.
1. Your avatar informs us that you are from another server. I suppose here you don't have any alts on Archo. Then please explain me what was your way of collecting objective informations about the atmosphere on this server?
- Reading a forum. Forum is read maybe by 10% of all the players (maximum) and maybe 1-2% of all the players participate in this. Of course, you can calculate these datas by yourself taking the number of active players and then the number of read articles per week, but generally my estimations are right.
Then you will judge the server considering 1% of its players which participate on this forum. It is scientifically ridiculous.
- Talking with another players from RT which have alts on this server. The communication ingame doesn't favorise long messages and really more detailed ("profound") communication amongst players. Your informations would then not only be based on subjective opinions coming from another persons (second hand information), but also on short messages which doesn't really explain why for example this person thinks this => meaning the possibility of misunderstanding are even bigger.
So then your informations will be indirect, subjective and not thorough.
- Adivinating?
2. Let us suppose you have an alt in Archo..
Let me then say that scientifically you can prove that one server is not really so different than another. There exists a distribution mode called the normal distribution or a gaussian one (for more info please consult wiki which states for sociology in short that in every human group, the most of its members are average ones and very unusual "personalities" are only a small amount of this group. Means in short that there are maybe some persons completely out of norm in each server, but they represent a small minority. The rest of the players are less or more the same on each server considering their character and another characteristics, maybe except nationality.
Then the opinions about each server are based on some stereotypes and many players then adapt to this opinion. I really don't think one server is better than another.. people just tend to adapt to some opinions and also perpetuate them without there are really any proofs it is true.
If now we start to say Arch is the server which ie. has the most of players with the highest income and we maintain this, then after a moment will think it is true... even if there will be absolutely no proof of this!

And last but not least, you get in general what do you expect. When you start interacting with people saying to you "they're unfriendly", believe me, you will only get proofs that it is true. In the same time another player can think people are friendly - and they will act conformly to your expectations, because you will interprete their actions in one sense or another..

.. even if the amount of stupid and intelligent people, nice and unpleasant, friendly and unfriendly is exactly the same on each server...

Epros - Raging Tide wrote: »

everyone here is all uptight. i dun like it

Bluelita - Archosaur wrote: »

stupidly long pointless text

bastilla hit the nail there!

Proclivity - Archosaur wrote: »

if your not listed on arch forums as the best something your looked down upon by everyone b:sad

/fixed, niggled at me like a loose tooth, take care now.