3 spark in stealth back
Pot_Head - Harshlands
Posts: 701 Arc User
just vote, leave comment, idc.
Post edited by Pot_Head - Harshlands on
0
Comments
-
**** no.0
-
i'm a sin and vote no.
1: it's not needed. good sins will still win
2: it makes non-sins QQ lessI hope that I shall always possess firmness and virtue enough to maintain what I consider the most enviable of title, the character of an honest man. -George Washington0 -
YES YES!!!!! just to see other people complain about what i say!b:laugh0
-
Why I voted no: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTivlkFqalY
+10 armors and ornaments (?) on the archer, +12 Nirvana 1st daggers on the sin.100% F2P player. Started PW: March 2007, Quit PW: March 2011.
pwcalc.com/e7016929e7b204ae "Pure axe" 8k HP multipath BM, last one of my kind.0 -
Kupuntu - Sanctuary wrote: »Why I voted no: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTivlkFqalY
+10 armors and ornaments (?) on the archer, +12 Nirvana 1st daggers on the sin.
You say that like a +12 wep won't hurt... (w/spark or not +12 hurts even with +10 everything gear...)0 -
Deora - Lost City wrote: »You say that like a +12 wep won't hurt... (w/spark or not +12 hurts even with +10 everything gear...)
I said no because sins (not just that sin) can do well enough in PvP without having to demon spark in stealth.100% F2P player. Started PW: March 2007, Quit PW: March 2011.
pwcalc.com/e7016929e7b204ae "Pure axe" 8k HP multipath BM, last one of my kind.0 -
No please nooo... Not another way for fail sins to still win and think they are the best, because they can abuse stealth.0
-
Kupuntu - Sanctuary wrote: »Why I voted no: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTivlkFqalY
+10 armors and ornaments (?) on the archer, +12 Nirvana 1st daggers on the sin.
Actually those are only +11 dagger.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Refining Simulator - aster.ohmydays.net/pw/refiningsimulator.html (don't use IE)
Genie Calculator - aster.ohmydays.net/pw/geniecalculator.html - (don't use IE)
Socket Calculator - aster.ohmydays.net/pw/socketcalculator.html0 -
buy more packs and maybe this will go away.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Move along..move along0
-
Kupuntu - Sanctuary wrote: »Why I voted no: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTivlkFqalY
+10 armors and ornaments (?) on the archer, +12 Nirvana 1st daggers on the sin.
b:cry Stop posting that vid, Link is my hero. b:sad[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
having triple spark in stealth is just a sick joke, to begin with, stealth in this, or ANY game is a joke anyway, if any1 shud be able to go invisable it shud be a damn wizard, there the ones studying magic and shud *learn* the art of invisibility, not a class with stupidly high DD, then be able to increase there damage to some stupid degree while invisable and 1 shot every1.
all that does it increase the players ego with OP'ness, not needed thanks.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Kantorek: we hope to see the economy in PWI come back "down to earth" if you will."
*One week later*
"Frankieraye: Lucky Corals and Platinum Charms are going to be in the Boutique indefinitely."
*few months later, PWI puts rank8/9 into the CS insanely cheap, raising gold 1mill+*0 -
I like the idea with the wiz getting stealth... *stealth* *sparked, frenzied bids on group of poor people* *stealth again* b:pleased0
-
i think sins should only get 1 spark b:victoryFail troll of harshlands0
-
Renza - Raging Tide wrote: »having triple spark in stealth is just a sick joke, to begin with, stealth in this, or ANY game is a joke anyway, if any1 shud be able to go invisable it shud be a damn wizard, there the ones studying magic and shud *learn* the art of invisibility, not a class with stupidly high DD, then be able to increase there damage to some stupid degree while invisable and 1 shot every1.
all that does it increase the players ego with OP'ness, not needed thanks.
This.
Invisibility in any traditional Tolkein based fantasy RPG is part of particular school of magic (usually Illusion). I see no reason why a melee only class is just "given" a magic skill that no one else can learn.
I voted no, simply for the reason that if sins get the ability to spark in stealth, all classes get to learn a stealth skill to rebalance it.Some people risk to employ me
Some people live to destroy me
Either way they die0 -
Xarathox - Dreamweaver wrote: »This.
Invisibility in any traditional Tolkein based fantasy RPG is part of particular school of magic (usually Illusion). I see no reason why a melee only class is just "given" a magic skill that no one else can learn.
I voted no, simply for the reason that if sins get the ability to spark in stealth, all classes get to learn a stealth skill to rebalance it.
It's not about illusion it's based on the principle of ninja's being "stealthy" and being able to blend in with their surroundings. Surely you saw ninja assassin (the movie). b:laugh
Anyway, no we don't need 3rd spark in stealth. Stealth is already a very bad abuse for PKing, and if you can't kill with a second spark (let alone needing one anyway) then you need some serious work on your PK skills as a sin.0 -
Voted no.
Sins have plenty of ways to kill someone without them fighting back already. demon/sage spark in stealth is just overpowered. Otherwise, I want the ability to cast BIDS while invisible with no one being able to see me channel it. It's only fair.0 -
No. When this happens Bramble Guard is going to be usable in pvp again... b:chuckle[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
To be or not to be.
Current Goals: none.0 -
***/ssiN - Dreamweaver wrote: »It's not about illusion it's based on the principle of ninja's being "stealthy" and being able to blend in with their surroundings. Surely you saw ninja assassin (the movie). b:laugh
Anyway, no we don't need 3rd spark in stealth. Stealth is already a very bad abuse for PKing, and if you can't kill with a second spark (let alone needing one anyway) then you need some serious work on your PK skills as a sin.
And since this game engine can't support a mechanic for using "traditional" blending into the enviroment (I.E. camo****ingflage), it's a cheap trick employed by developers to just give assassins an Illusion skill from an other more famous RPG (it starts with a D).Some people risk to employ me
Some people live to destroy me
Either way they die0 -
rofl, I know a few sins who thought they were all that doing the triple spark in stealth. After the nerf, wow they failed soooo hard everyone just laughed at them.
b:laugh[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
b:flowerHave a Techno Rave Flower!b:flower
-Self-Proclaimed TW commentator of HT-
-Certified Barbarian Master-
-You gained +10 coolness points for viewing this signature-
-Master of Coffee-0 -
Kupuntu - Sanctuary wrote: »Why I voted no: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTivlkFqalY
+10 armors and ornaments (?) on the archer, +12 Nirvana 1st daggers on the sin.
Do you have to link that as your example? Haters be hatin....0 -
.. well the dmg is good but I hope any sin seeing that vid facepalms at the lack of skill useage on that sin in the video. It's what I get the impression of when this sin Lingzi or w/e speaks in the sin forum.
I vote no, I don't particularly like the idea of **** players rolling out like that without having to learn to play as long as they can use 3-4 skills to win.I can see what you see not,
Vision milky, then eyes rot.
When you turn, they will be gone,
Whispering their hidden song.
Then you see what cannot be,
Shadows move where light should be.
Out of darkness, out of mind,
Cast down into the Halls of the Blind.0 -
Why would anyone even ask a question like this. OP must be trolling.Youtube Channel: youtube.com/user/D2VeT/videos?flow=grid&view=0
Current gear: pwcalc.com/6ab2893fbfb080a8
[SIGPIC]http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=684hgk&s=5[/SIGPIC]0 -
i vote yes because i can NOT kill anyone without sparked stealth QFQ! b:cryb:shedtearb:embarrass
oh and i LOL'd at how fail the sin in that vid was :P
i LOL'd at how more fail the archer was... he had apoth.. just not the kind to target that fail sin in stealth XD
and im not hatin just LOLin is all XDb:shocked[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
SLITNOTb:chuckle0 -
KingThis - Heavens Tear wrote: »i vote yes because i can NOT kill anyone without stealth QFQ! b:cryb:shedtearb:embarrass
oh and i LOL'd at how fail the sin in that vid was :P
i LOL'd at how more fail the archer was... he had apoth.. just not the kind to target that fail sin in stealth XD
and im not hatin just LOLin is all XDb:shocked
the poll isn't about removing stealth....it's about a 3rd spark in stealth....you voted yes for 3rd spark in stealth. So you're saying you need 3rd spark in stealth or you can't kill anyone? And you called those people in the video fail.....0 -
Sneakret - Heavens Tear wrote: ».. well the dmg is good but I hope any sin seeing that vid facepalms at the lack of skill useage on that sin in the video. It's what I get the impression of when this sin Lingzi or w/e speaks in the sin forum.
I vote no, I don't particularly like the idea of **** players rolling out like that without having to learn to play as long as they can use 3-4 skills to win.
isnt that the sin that QQed like mad when they removed the 2 spark in stealth?
sin forums where fun that days b:cute0 -
***/ssiN - Dreamweaver wrote: »the poll isn't about removing stealth....it's about a 3rd spark in stealth....you voted yes for 3rd spark in stealth. So you're saying you need 3rd spark in stealth or you can't kill anyone? And you called those people in the video fail.....
oh sorry lemme edit that to where it said without stealth... it should be without *sparked* stealth... for slow people like yourself b:thanks[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
SLITNOTb:chuckle0 -
Linnkotsu - Sanctuary wrote: »Do you have to link that as your example? Haters be hatin....
NUUU everyone likes LinnkElena Costel: I wash my hands of this affair.
Legerity: *drags you back* *stains your hands with said affair*
Elena Costel: Noooo... I don't want to have a dirty affair with Lady Legerity...
Qui: b:dirty0 -
Renza - Raging Tide wrote: »having triple spark in stealth is just a sick joke, to begin with, stealth in this, or ANY game is a joke anyway, if any1 shud be able to go invisable it shud be a damn wizard, there the ones studying magic and shud *learn* the art of invisibility, not a class with stupidly high DD, then be able to increase there damage to some stupid degree while invisable and 1 shot every1.
all that does it increase the players ego with OP'ness, not needed thanks.
Go Wizzies! b:laugh lol stealthed BT/BIDS on a bunch of noobs b:nosebleedb:sin
on topic:
Hellz no their alrdy OP enough[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I have the best mom ever, she brought me drugs and fruit juice - Reavღ
Challenge accepted I'm going to go blow up the sun - FanFon
Those crabs are like the Energizer Bunny, they just keep going and going and going... - Wildsblade0 -
Just to **** off people :P I vote for yes b:chuckle[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]"wink wink"0
-
40 stupid sins are too dumb to kill people without triple spark.
Well, 39 I guess, since Ega voted for lulz.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
ಥ_ಥ MOAR.
SkyKoC - How long is yours?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk