KY vs Zulu 84th round)

Kimmahri - Harshlands wrote: »

how do we xpect to win when our leader fails so hard b:cry
found this ss in Zulu forums WTF leader shattering FTL



we looking for 4 Zulu - KY 0 ???
b:sad

what a terrible player....dying to atleast 5 zulu. jeeze xulin, making us look bad again.

yeah some kids got extremely happy over some pots and mirages

Lol. I don't really see what all the hoopla is about XuLin dropping/ shattering.

He drops/ shatters like every other day and it's POTS not anything worthwhile, cos all his sht is bound.

Oh well. Have fun bragging about something that has always been pretty much an inside-guild joke. =]

random part of that pix
thats the interesting part of that pic

lol.. zulu for the winnnnnnnnnn

I love iffyy .

EDIT: I thought its Curses.. but now I think Im wrong QQ

Longknife - Harshlands wrote: »

Isn't it wise to take as much sure-fire land as possible though?

I'm no TW expert here, but it seems like more land = more profit, whatever that profit may be. :U
While Kylin has wasted three weeks trying to take a rather difficult piece of land, Zulu has expanded their territory by three. Frankly I've been wondering why Kylin doesn't go after Evoke or Crimson...

yea, but zulu does so much bragging its getting annoying to watch them brag, and then every week atack a weak faction instead of ky. If zulu didn't brag so much i wouldn't be as bothered by it.

The reason ky dosn't just take crim and evokes land is because they are netural with eachother, and they have a kos sitting right next to their land, so why not go after the kos and the only threat to them on the map? At least it gives them fun tws, intead of crystal rushes.

and on a last note, why not let the small guilds have some fun tw? instead of ruining it for them, i can understand securing plume, since being scared one of the small guilds could take if from you, but after that letting the small guilds tw while twing aginst your only threat on the map would be nice to other people. (pretty sure most zulu will laugh at this excuse, but not everyone has the money to +10 their weapon or have all day to play), i know they cant keep their land forever, but might as well let the kindergarden kids play in the sandbox instead of kicking over their sandcasles with your big 1st grader shoes.

Well for me that small guilds have lands its just funny.
You can see alot of faction bidding 20mil and losing, at least it makes me lough.b:surrender

Xprestigex - Harshlands wrote: »

and on a last note, why not let the small guilds have some fun tw? instead of ruining it for them, i can understand securing plume, since being scared one of the small guilds could take if from you, but after that letting the small guilds tw while twing aginst your only threat on the map would be nice to other people. (pretty sure most zulu will laugh at this excuse, but not everyone has the money to +10 their weapon or have all day to play), i know they cant keep their land forever, but might as well let the kindergarden kids play in the sandbox instead of kicking over their sandcasles with your big 1st grader shoes.

My point is WHY having an alliance/be neutral to a guild you can take down in 15 minutes?
Let's say this were the US vs. China. Friggin Ghana or some incredibly small country offers to help the US; this wouldn't help much cause Ghana is not exactly famous for having a large army. On the other hand, the US can take over Ghana and use their resources; a move that would profit the US far more. In real life, of course a matter of morals comes into play. Only a cold, heartless person would kill civilians in a country that offered their country help. Here however, it's just a game. No one will get hurt if Kylin takes over Crimson or Evoke.

Again, I'm no TW expert, but if Zulu is gaining profits from the land they're winning while Kylin is not gaining any profit from attacking Zulu, then Kylin is sinking their own ship.

Notice how most of Zulu propaganda is done by ppl not in Zulu? There is a reason my forum post has not gotten a lot bigger lately. xD

So much Zulu talking to the point we don't even have to bother.

U can always get morons to talk though, regardless of guilds. We got plenty of those in both guilds and outside the main conflict.

P.S: I'm the official Zulu moron. b:cute Im always up for "conversations" Specially sex related topics.b:dirty

Longknife - Harshlands wrote: »

My point is WHY having an alliance/be neutral to a guild you can take down in 15 minutes?
Let's say this were the US vs. China. Friggin Ghana or some incredibly small country offers to help the US; this wouldn't help much cause Ghana is not exactly famous for having a large army. On the other hand, the US can take over Ghana and use their resources; a move that would profit the US far more. In real life, of course a matter of morals comes into play. Only a cold, heartless person would kill civilians in a country that offered their country help. Here however, it's just a game. No one will get hurt if Kylin takes over Crimson or Evoke.

Again, I'm no TW expert, but if Zulu is gaining profits from the land they're winning while Kylin is not gaining any profit from attacking Zulu, then Kylin is sinking their own ship.

Zulu/Kylin defending Crimson + Kylin/Zulu + PengWINS/Evoke would make them lose probably one land at least each week. 1v1 is better than 2/3 vs 1, so I think Kylin is doing the best thing at the moment imo. Note that Crimson is neutral with Kylin, Evoke is ally/neutral too i think and PengWINS is there cause they were able to cause considerable damage to Evoke.

So, Kylin or Zulu will hurt themselves somehow if they do what you are suggesting, but thats only my point of view.

Hipotacros - Harshlands wrote: »

Zulu/Kylin defending Crimson + Kylin/Zulu + PengWINS/Evoke would make them lose probably one land at least each week. 1v1 is better than 2/3 vs 1, so I think Kylin is doing the best thing at the moment imo. Note that Crimson is neutral with Kylin, Evoke is ally/neutral too i think and PengWINS is there cause they were able to cause considerable damage to Evoke.

So, Kylin or Zulu will hurt themselves somehow if they do what you are suggesting, but thats only my point of view.

You have a point of course, but the issue with that is that Zulu is establishing dominance. It's 4-0 in Zulu's favor, so of course every random faction would rather jump Kylin before Zulu. The only reason a guild would probably choose to jump Zulu is because Zulu isn't well liked. However, Zulu hasn't been well liked for a long time, and despite this they're not getting jumped. On the other hand, we know Kingdom showed weakness and that's all it took for random factions to swarm them.

Both your view and my view offer good arguments, imo. I think what it simply comes down to is what will happen when Zulu attacks. If Zulu wins, then I think Kylin's been making a mistake by letting the others hold territory. Attacking them would've demonstrated their dominance and it would've cleared future enemies from their northern side. If Zulu loses on offense, then ok. They've shown dominance AND they've remained well liked, so people would probably go after Zulu. As things are now though, Zulu has been demonstrating dominance, so it's likely that all the random guilds currently have their eyes fixed on Kylin before Zulu.

The last issue I see with it is simply that the treaties with those guys are doomed to fail. Crimson is gonna get bored sitting up there eventually, and they have nowhere to go but through Kylin. The moment they do get bored, I'm sure Zulu will be there to join in, cause yeah wtf 2v1 would weaken Kylin.



Same as you though. I'm simply speculating. :P

Elednor - Harshlands wrote: »

Just kinda outa interest, what is the relationship bettween KY and Crimson? Allies? Truce? Secret lovers?

busted b:surrender