Stop the PK at hunting zone

sidamit wrote: »

Dear GM..i really like play this game(PWI)..i suggest,stop the PK at hunting zone..Because its unfair for small level(30).I ask u GM,if u play at charater level 30..some character very strong than you,and PK you..what do you think?its eazy to finish the quest or not??I suggest not stop the PK all time,only at hunting zone..You think this,one day many times i killed by stronger charater.how i finished the quest??I didnt disturbing them..Firstly..i didnt started use the PK,but other strong character do it.I want hunting,then PK make me hate that people..for example..TalismanOnline its better about the PK..they can control blocking the attacker..for your information..what about your player didnt use credit card to buy your very good item?He or she just do quest for upgarde they level..Make this game(PWI) good for your little player...if want PK,at outside the city or arena.thats really fair..Dear GM..if your really care about your customer,think this suggestion..b:victory

IceJazmin - Heavens Tear wrote: »

If you are on a PVP server, start a new character on a PVE server
If you are on a PVE server, DO NOT turn PVP on.....

There, problem solved.

TerminatorX - Lost City wrote: »

Lol carebear servers.

Sure, retire to the life of a conflict avoiding pansy. Rep+1. Ya know, most people should just run away when confronted with the least amount of violence. It would make being a criminal so much easier if the police gave up when one pulls a knife out, I'd make a killing robbing banks. And insurgents? I suppose we should just forfeit our way of life before they bomb (PK) us again.

It's a PK server, part of the draw is killing people who **** you off, because that was realistic between ancient warriors and factions (see Japan's feudal period, or the Hellenistic generals after Iskander's death, or even the situation in Iraq between the shiite/sunni/kurds, and in america, union vs. confederates, northern/eastern hippies vs. southern/western neocons, bloods vs. crips or east vs. west). When real men get mad, or even just feel like having sadistic fun, someone should die, or get hurt. If you reject this view of the world, you really do belong in a PvE server with the rest of them.

Yulk - Heavens Tear wrote: »

Ok, people that QQing about PK is once thing. But seriouesly... how about talking b:fatb elsewhere k dumbass?

TerminatorX - Lost City wrote: »

Lol fail flamebait.

Look, if you enjoy PvE, whatever. Saying another person's opinion is equal to manure because you don't agree with shows you have no viable retort of the intellectual sort and must resort to childish insults to express your frustration. Go talk to Dr. Phil, leave conversation to people who actually have points to make.

b:kiss

TerminatorX - Lost City wrote: »

Huh?

So if someone repeatedly attacks you in a video game while you're presumably doing nothing wrong, getting even is inherently bad advice? What kind of world do you live in kid? If someone attacks you in real life, you make them pay for it, either by calling the cops or beating their face in. Otherwise, they get comfortable and continue to do it - teaching them the repercussions of their actions is the means to stop their actions.

Let me repeat:
We send criminals to jail.
We kill terrorists.
We hit bullies (or rely on safety in numbers).

We do these things to make people stop harming us. This is the state of the real world. I promise you, if the police did not exist, nor armies, nor any other militia or sort of public protection, the people who have this weird sense of security would quickly be given a brutal reality check by those who are powerful and strong (real life's equivalent of high-level characters). Why do you think organizations like the police exist? Because if they didn't, life would be like the middle ages and people would constantly be killed (especially nowadays, because modern guns make it absurdly easy for the least skilled operators to kill groups of unarmed before ammo runs out).

PK is the option to turn the "police protection" off, to go back to the middle ages where life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (levels) were not guaranteed. Those who prefer to live in a carebear world like our current one where you only get hit when you step into the boxing ring (a.k.a. turn on PK) are the PvE players. I, personally, don't ever want to live under constantly death irl but doing so ingame is the more authentic and realistic experience. Complaining, in a game that's about warriors in a non-secure world, that another player is killing you in combat is akin to complaining that your sandwich is too delicious. How can you claim to be an ancient warrior who slays dragons and dungeon-hunts and has collected great treasures from monster killing if you're scared of another person? People killed people too, even in those dragon-slaying fantasies and monster stories there's always murders (PKs) that occur. That's exactly how it should be =/

tl;dr? idc. too much typing, gonna go do something else for awhile.

TerminatorX - Lost City wrote: »

Once again, you resort to flames, somehow finding grounds to call me a dumb*ss, claim i'm "trying to be smart", and that I have anger issues that must be taken out ingame - and by the stretch of that statement, I fail. Oh, and I disgust you. And lol I'm a bully/criminal? I'll deconstruct your accusations and leave you with nothing solid to stand upon.

Accusation 1: - Calling a person online a dumb*ss is firstly a flame. If you meant it literally, you're insinuating my intelligence is below par. My IQ stands @133. Not that I can actually prove it without revealing my irl indentity (not gonna happen). If you're basing your insinuation on common sense instead of what can be display on the bell curve, well, let me question your intelligence. From another thread:


(i should have remebered her advice as a golden truth - absolute in all scenarios)

She's not alone in her opinion of YOU. That at least makes two of us, and if anyone else wants to join the fun feel free to post. Given that your sig exclaims trolls to be stupid, if you are trolling, you're stupid by your own decree, and if you aren't, then I and Alarra consider you a complete moron, and I will personally back this claim up in the near future (within this post).

I suppose it's time for me to explain Umineko no Naku Kori Ni's truth system to you, since I just referenced golden truth.
Blue Truth is a possible truth. It has not been disproven, but to be taken seriously it must be reinforced by evidence. The more evidence there is, the stronger that truth is, however, until actually proven, the Blue Truth is really more opinion than actual truth, and can be disproven by red or golden truth. (example: x > 1. x < 3. x = 2. That would seem to be absolute... but it isn't.)
Red Truth is a conditional truth; that is, it's only true in the correct situation. The condition has to be stated, otherwise one is free to find a loophole in that truth, like claiming it only applies to the exact moment it was spoken. A Red Truth is definitely true in at least one way, however. (example: x > 1. x < 3. x is a whole number. x = 2. Under those conditions, x must = 2, it cannot possibly equal any number with a decimal (1.5, 2.455473575, the square root of pi) like in the blue truth's equation.
Gold Truth is absolute truth. Unconditional. Nothing to explain, if it's true under all possible scenarios, it's a golden truth. (example: as of this post, x is sometimes the 24th sequential letter in the modern english alphabet. since this is an absolute fact that will not change barring time-travel or the interference of a deity of your choosing, this truth is golden.

Why did I mention all of that. Well, we have a red truth ((trolls are stupid). Normally, this would be blue (as your opinion), but I'll allow it imaginary absoluteness within this argument since we agree on it. And, there's a blue truth (Yulk is either a troll or a complete moron.) I think you deny being a troll, since you'll be activating the Red Truth's condition and declaring youself stupid. Once more, (if you're a troll, and trolls are stupid, then you're stupid. if a = b, and a = c, then b = c, right?

Therefore, I will be reinforcing the blue truth Yulk is a complete moron instead. And I'll take your favourite word "dumb*ss" to be a synonym for "complete moron". That is, if a dumb*ss and a complete moron are the same, then proving that Yulk is a dumb***** is the same as proving he is a complete moron, because if x is true, and x = y, then y must also be true

Accusation 2: - I'm "trying to be smart"? No, I've actually been talking normally this entire time. If this manner of conversation seems too intelligent for you, you're just... what did you call me? Oh, a dumb*ss? Yeah, that, you fit that niche pretty well. Blue truth reinforcement #1.

Accusation 3 - I'm taking out my real life anger inside of a video game. I'll begin by quoting myself from where you seemed to have obtained that idea:



Ahem. Okay, let's see. I'm in a PK server. I'm killing people who've pissed me off. Um... unless my real life enemies play PWI (I wouldn't know, highly doubt it), that != taking out real life frustrations in a game. If I get cheated on and spend a night killing streetwalkers in Vice City, that's a different story. Killing PK server users who **** you off has nothing to do with anything outside the game, unless you find the power to do so therapeutic and relaxing - which is just as possible killing giant monsters instead, btw.

So what happened. Where did you reach this misunderstanding? I'll bet there was a good dosage of tl;dr and you skimmed over the paragraph, barely read the sentence, and made and assumption on what it meant. What do assumptions do again? Makes a *ss out of you. Dumb*****, in this take. Once again, blue truth reinforced.

Accusation 4 - Because of accusation 3, I fail. Since accusation 3 was disproven, this accusation can no longer be true for the same reason, and is dismissed as Yulk's failure.

Accusation 5 - Because of accusation 3, I have issues. This accusation is dismissed, reason ditto for above.

Accusation 6 - Because of accusation 3, I disgust you. I may or may not disgust you, in any case, it's not because of accusation 3. This accusation is dismissed, reason ditto for above.

(notice how you based so much of what you we're saying on a false accusation. you know, putting all of your eggs into a flimsy basket? who would normally do that in an argument? surely a dumb*ss would base an entire argument, and very volatile insults, on such a broken reasoning. blue truth reinforcement #3.

Accusation 7 - I am a bully or criminal. Um... no dude. I got my butt kicked. A lot. And i still look both ways before I so much as jaywalk, let alone do felonies. Because I'd get sent to jail. And bullied. Making assumptions on someone's personal life based on their online persona? Dumb*ss, because you remember what assumption do, right? Blue truth reinforcement #4.

I suppose, the greatest reinforcement to my blue truth would be when I delighted read you next post and discover it to be nothing but flames. I wouldn't write another cascade of text. Two sentences would be enough to end all of this, at that point, then I would decline to further post.