QQme isn't satisfied

QQme isn't the only guild accused of pulling bosses into safe zone, you know. *cough*

I just want to say that QQme as a guild does not support killing lowbies. After all, why do you think we went and killed our own director in Secret Passage! b:thanks

As a matter of fact, contrary to popular belief, we don't support any kind of rule breaking. Luring bosses, botting, etc... We have, and will report any guildy caught doing these things.

Taboo - Harshlands wrote: »

i like you jugg, but you cant be serious here. i dont remember the last fb29 i have run without seeing QQ pking in SP. everyone on the server could name several people in QQ that bot, and people obviously lure bosses to SZ.

Wait, really? I barely go to SP so I dunno.

SS and post on forums if you see it.

b:angry

Yawn. No offense Taboo, but people from every guild have been caught killing lowbies. I've seen KD, KY, and Crim members at Hidden Orchid and Orchid Temple alike at various times. Last I checked none of the above are recruiting at level 30+. It doesn't mean that they as a guild condone it, and it doesn't mean that if you present proof of the act to someone with power, that they won't do something about it. QQme is no different. There's this thing called standards.. and the majority of every guild has them.

Btw.. how is pulling Soul Hunter into safe zone and letting his HP debuff tick people's charms in Dreamweaver Port while you take your sweet time killing it any better than some nub pulling Dismal Shade into safe zone and killing the lowbies sitting there? I've come back from afking there to KD and KY killing it (not together or at the same time of course) doing just that. I'm not the only one, either. I dunno about Crimson, I haven't really seen them doing world bosses.

The reputation surrounding QQme as some big server hate generating faction (though to be fair, it has gotten better recently) reminds me a lot of when the server had just come out, and people assumed all their own that Rule34 was trying to be that way because they PKed on a PK server. I guess I'm not surprised, past precedence after all, but it's just getting stupid at this point. No guild currently owning multiple territories can claim 100% that none of their members have ever done these things. -_-;

Taboo - Harshlands wrote: »

i have no problem with lowbie killing if thats what makes you happy, but QQme recently has acted like they are taking a stand against their members doing it, but clearly its not affecting these people. the upper 50% of QQme are in my eyes trying to change peoples minds about the faction while the lower 50% continue to be morons and tarnish the guild name.

I killed my own director at least four times with an entire squad, including our current director, just for camping SP and not leaving when I told him to. If you think we're not seriously taking a stand against it, you're far beyond the level that I am able to condescend.

Taboo - Harshlands wrote: »

maybe you should put a couple people on pkk duty in SP then, cause although you stopped ascii, there are many others.

If anyone sees it they're welcome to whisper me and I'll come solve it.

That said, not everyone in SP is lowbie PKing. People literally "hang-out" there.

Aeneas - Harshlands wrote: »

Oh and just to be clear, I don't give a **** what people think about QQme. I think camping lvl30's lame and enjoy padding my kill count on lame people.

if you didnt care ascii would still be in the guild, and you would have no problem with members lowbie killing. so, although Funz original idea was to make a rule free guild where anything goes and the only goal was to prevent any single guild from getting to stong. Has now turned into a guild abiding by rules and teaming up with the strongest TW guild to help them get even more land, gg.

Aeneas - Harshlands wrote: »

Ascii probably would still be in the faction if he hadn't emo-raged and kicked 198 of us out. Maybe not Director, idk about all of that. Lot of people wanted him gone (clearly with prescient foresight) before then as it was.

No, I was honest. I think it's lame. So if I see it I'll come kill them. It's not very complicated. There is no grand plan for an image makeover, it's not part of some deeply complex nefarious plot to takeover the server. I leave that stuff to Machiavellicon. We're just dumb cash-shopping, pk'ing, flower-picking, kids stroking their e-peens. And when we see stuff we don't like we respond by killing the person.



PS if we were worried about land we wouldn't have all rejoined the faction with all of 2 territories.

glad you used my quote but didnt adress anything about the current state of QQ as far as rules and TW ideas are concerned, that tells me something right there.

actually you could have attacked us this up coming week if anti wasnt so greedy, so yet again, QQ members brainwashed by an idea that isnt being upheld.

Taboo - Harshlands wrote: »

i have no problem with lowbie killing if thats what makes you happy, but QQme recently has acted like they are taking a stand against their members doing it, but clearly its not affecting these people. the upper 50% of QQme are in my eyes trying to change peoples minds about the faction while the lower 50% continue to be morons and tarnish the guild name.

First things first, I personally don't like lowbie killers and will kill them on sight most of the time. So an "if that floats your boat" line doesn't really bother me, and it doesn't bother most of the QQ that troll the majority of this forum section. If they cared about the image they generate, they'd correct people making topics instead. They do something in-game about things they don't like.

Taboo - Harshlands wrote: »

actually you could have attacked us this up coming week if anti wasnt so greedy, so yet again, QQ members brainwashed by an idea that isnt being upheld.

Aeneas is right, lol. We were all like "Anti, just lose the TW and we'll go attack KD" on vent. He wound up beating one guild, then a second guild the next day **** drunk at what is like 2am for him. We didn't know he'd win, but what room do we have to complain that he did win? =P

Taboo - Harshlands wrote: »

if you didnt care ascii would still be in the guild, and you would have no problem with members lowbie killing. so, although Funz original idea was to make a rule free guild where anything goes and the only goal was to prevent any single guild from getting to stong. Has now turned into a guild abiding by rules and teaming up with the strongest TW guild to help them get even more land, gg.

QQme didn't "go against everything it was made for" as people like to say now. If QQme hadn't truced with Crimson, it'd be 3v1 on Crimson, then 2v1 on another guild, then 1v1 or worse.. the map would stay allied between two guilds. As things are now, it's a 2v2. It will be a 1v1 in the end between the ones that last through it all, however far away that is.. the possibilities for who gets 2v1'd after that will rely solely on which guilds stay together after losing land. That is NOT server domination. That is more of a chance to go any way possible than LC ever had when the top guilds were still relatively similar in levels of power.

You guys have a choice, you know. You don't have to stack wars on Crimson with Kylin. One of you could *gasp* attack QQme, so that there are two large 1v1s going on. I thought I read a while back that KD wouldn't "gang up" on Crimson like "Crimson and QQ" are doing to Kylin? Hmmm.. we'll see when the bids are placed, I guess.

Taboo - Harshlands wrote: »

i think QQme should listen to Aeneas, we just talked for over an hour in game about the state of the map and what is happening.

No one listens to me, least of all myself b:surrender