Pets

Kishanhood - Heavens Tear · February 2009

I think it is unfair how only venomancers can have combat pets!
I am an archer and i require a combat pet just as much as a veno would so why cant i have one?
I hope you take this idea into account!

Mosabi - Heavens Tear · February 2009

no because this game will be balanced....and we dont want that now do we??

Hasukurobi - Heavens Tear · February 2009

Kishanhood - Heavens Tear wrote: »

I think it is unfair how only venomancers can have combat pets!
I am an archer and i require a combat pet just as much as a veno would so why cant i have one?
I hope you take this idea into account!

An archer does not need a Pet. You can escape mobs via flight and can easily out kill both Players and Monsters by comparison to us. I have Archers KS me ALL the time. You are blatantly best at everything the only downside for you is that you have to pay for each shot you take which lowers your overall income from kills but on the other hand you also do not have as big a repair bill as many players if you use some strategy while attacking.

Mages could use a little help (a skill maybe?) to better get enemies off their back though, espcially early on when everything they attack seems to over power them with little they can do about it.

Daerys - Sanctuary · February 2009

987,675,386,024th post about this. Hasn't happened yet, most likely won't ever.
Thanks for playing, though.

Leprechaundh - Sanctuary · March 2009

I think it is unfair how only venomancers can have combat pets!
I am an archer and i require a combat pet just as much as a veno would so why cant i have one?
I hope you take this idea into account!

Ya think you have probs? Well, at least you're not a wiz, the most gimpd class in the history of gaming. And yes, At least wizards (The most gimped class in the history of gaming, as you may recall) should have the ability to train at least a friggin palmerenian.

An archer does not need a Pet. You can escape mobs via flight and can easily out kill both Players and Monsters by comparison to us. I have Archers KS me ALL the time. You are blatantly best at everything the only downside for you is that you have to pay for each shot you take which lowers your overall income from kills but on the other hand you also do not have as big a repair bill as many players if you use some strategy while attacking.

Heh, yeah...Archers don't get to whine, but maybe if ppl keep telling the developers that the one class pet thing is ****, they may get enough common sense in thier thick, thick skulls to revise their horrendisly unbalanced system

Mages could use a little help (a skill maybe?) to better get enemies off their back though, espcially early on when everything they attack seems to over power them with little they can do about it.

Apperently you do agree somewhat with the well known fact that the planning of the wizard class was complete bull, but i aint settlin for just a freeze spell or that ****, im talkin full equal rights up in this *****! That's right, it's revolution! take it to the streets! Stick it to the pencil necked programmer man!

PS: It may seem I'm a little flustered, but gettin you **** beat in and killed by monsters way lower lvl than you can do that to a person*, but i aint mad at u, im just gonna flap my jaw untill i get a friggin PET!

Key:
* Disclaimer

Mosabi - Heavens Tear · March 2009

Leprechaundh - Sanctuary wrote: »

Ya think you have probs? Well, at least you're not a wiz, the most gimpd class in the history of gaming. And yes, At least wizards (The most gimped class in the history of gaming, as you may recall) should have the ability to train at least a friggin palmerenian.

Heh, yeah...Archers don't get to whine, but maybe if ppl keep telling the developers that the one class pet thing is ****, they may get enough common sense in thier thick, thick skulls to revise their horrendisly unbalanced system

Apperently you do agree somewhat with the well known fact that the planning of the wizard class was complete bull, but i aint settlin for just a freeze spell or that ****, im talkin full equal rights up in this *****! That's right, it's revolution! take it to the streets! Stick it to the pencil necked programmer man!

PS: It may seem I'm a little flustered, but gettin you **** beat in and killed by monsters way lower lvl than you can do that to a person*, but i aint mad at u, im just gonna flap my jaw untill i get a friggin PET!

Key:
* Disclaimer

no we dont want pets venos can have thier damn pets and use them to satisfy thier perverted sexual apppeal with them but no what we want is either necromency to call a dead skeleton warrir to aid you in battle for a set of time or an elemntal gaurdian with which each element has a pet like form that attacks enemies that you attack..

_CatGirl_ - Heavens Tear · March 2009

ok, i know that alot of other classes want pets but... venos only have pet because we have poor physical def. the pets are there to take agro, and keep us safe. when my pet dies, i have to fly away, or i die too. my veno has like 600 physical def. i know a lvl 46 bm with 3k physical def.

songuy · March 2009

wizzys have lower p-def than veno's and don't have anything to draw aggro for them.
btw, I'm not in favor of a pet for wizzys but an elemental summon beast would be fantastic.

draglar · March 2009

yeah wizards should get familars ^.^
but as a side note archers have preaty low defence and flying away isn't easy because enemies can hit you when you are way out of arms reach and if a enemy does get close your gonna get pwnd i get killed by enemys way lower lvl than me

Lynaris - Sanctuary · March 2009

letting other classes have pets deletes the game uniqueness. stop whining.
but yes i sort of agree wizards should have something

Pets

Comments

Categories