So Pwi Closed the Discusion

They stopped to talk about multiclient because it already exists: noticed 6 bots using the same script at jolly (there are more but didn't had the time to just sit and watch), gamazon bots went online again too.

bananabanban wrote: »

It's obvious why it was closed, because of the incessant bickering and squabbling.

It's utterly pointless, they will make their annoucement, when they make it or they won't make one at all!

No amount of forum posts will change the outcome, just wait or quit! It really is that simple.

I would absolutely disagree that additional forum posts have no effect. PWE has a long history of waiting out the negative PR from their awful changes and hoping everyone forgets. We have to remind them (without being frequent enough to count as spam, obviously) that this isn't going away.

(Given that I'm probably one of the squabblers you're referring to, let me just say that if the mods disapproved of my discussion with jadasia back there, they needed only to ask us to stop the discussion... not sure why that would've required thread closure)

I am in agreement. That thread is the hope of this community. Carelessly and thoughtless the actions shown by the moderator in closing the thread. That action should be undone ASAP. ​​

And before this thread is closed.

The other thread devolved into nothing more than circular discussion. Nothing new or meaningful was added.

It's not likely this issue will become goon glitching QQ 2.0

Bye

a good solution perhaps to avoid closure of threads would be to just blacklist or avoid to reply jadasia, which is just trolling and derailing every discussion.
then if perhaps heero & co. would get a full time job perhaps they will have less time to click here and there on the forums thinking to be useful by randomly closing discussions, or moving them in forgotten sections, or delete replies because from their pov someone's opinion maybe counts less than jadasia trolling everywhere....
but that's pwe... we are pretty much at the deciding moments for this title, will it gasp a little more or is it gonna die.​​

jadasia wrote: »

Personal attacks like this is what gets threads closed fast.

Irony per our previous debate aside, I agree with this on its face.

@tabaloul , naming and shaming rarely does any good (if ever). When I engaged with jadasia in debate on the closed thread, I tried to stay away from individual-centric language, which is my usual policy. Doesn't always work out that way as the discussion goes on, but we have to try. Usually when you have a problem with one specific person, your real problem is less with them and more with the behavior they're engaging in.

Regarding heero... he hasn't posted in this thread at all, and it was phantomforce who closed the other one, so this sounds like a personal grievance (and that's not doing you any favors, either). Like it or not, the mods are the mods. If they close something, move on. The overall issue is still present, and it still merits discussion, but it would have to be conducted in this or other threads.

i assure you forum posts have zero effect, unless numbers decline and charging declines nothing will change..... all the all that the forum posts prove is that you are indeed still here playing and charging!

Hi all,

The thread will be reopened in due course. However it was up and down which I can see is well noted and understood by most.

Thanks.