test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Neverwinter Discussion › General Discussion (PC)

PVP content ignorance

vadi88gvadi88g Member Posts: 54
edited February 2015 in General Discussion (PC)
Im the only one who think that the developer let the PVP die on NW?

Is there at least some PVP content for mod 6?

For many its the most important part in a MMO and has big potential in NW but there is no Content or fixes added since long time...

ridiculous how ignorant the developers are to PVP , only this pve dragon stuff added since i play here...

and yes there is allways a lot of cry becaus of pvp because its competition.

if you dont want to spend any money on pvp content let at least the user create PVP content through PVP FOUNDRY.

its a small step for the developer but a big step in the improvement for the pvp game part.
Post edited by vadi88g on

Comments

  • UnknownUnknown
    edited February 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • katbozejziemikatbozejziemi Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 856 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    So the worst aspect of MMOs is the the most important thing in an MMO for you?

    Are cutscenes the most important thing in an action game as well?
  • vadi88gvadi88g Member Posts: 54
    edited February 2015
    Every one tell me to quit this game because of pvp die in nw?
    so this is the generall answer?


    this game mechanics are perfect for actionfull fast pvp competiotns .

    at least you could add kind of pvp foundry and so to revive pvp.


    who say pvp is stupid:
    in generall you need much more skill and knowledge to fight a player then a computer.
  • eldartheldarth Member Posts: 4,494 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Wow, ADD much? You've only been playing 6 months and complaining about new PvP stuff?
    Have you done Domination? Gauntlgrym? IWD?
    PWE Vanilla Forum Bug Fixes, Enhancements, and Themes
    Foundry Bugs | Foundry Improvement Requests
    5980586iqxqP.png
    Encounter Matrix | Advanced Foundry Topics
  • godlysoul2godlysoul2 Member Posts: 661 Bounty Hunter
    edited February 2015
    magenubbie wrote: »
    Don't take this the wrong way, but uhm..
    You're playing a PvE game for PvP? Something's gotta be wrong there.

    Why do you deliberately continue to spew this false, poisonous statement about? Look at the Russian server. Look at the PvP development that went on in previous mod dedicated largely to PvP updates. Look at them still working on PvP gear & balance. While it isn't their primary interest (simply because the game has grown into more PvE players than PvP) they are still recognizing it as an important part of the game. This game very much has the potential to be an extremely PvP based game.

    Why would you insist on trying to so strongly compel individuals not to play the game or only to play it in a certain way because the majority doesn't conform to their views of what content is most enjoyable? As someone who only enjoys the PvP aspect of the game I find this statement extremely offensive and as a statement which works to fosters a smaller, less coherent community.

    The rest of your post is fine. Personally I didn't even bother to read it after that quote until posting this though. In the future please refrain from using lines like that.
  • imaginaerum1imaginaerum1 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 378 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    godlysoul2 wrote: »
    The rest of your post is fine. Personally I didn't even bother to read it.

    Do tell....
  • lewstelamon01lewstelamon01 Member Posts: 7,415 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Please remember to convey your feedback in a manner which is not insulting or bashing the devs, in accordance with the RoC. The OP of this thread does not qualify as such.
    ROLL TIDE ROLL

    Great Weapon Fighter: Because when is today not a good day to die?

    PC and PS4 player. Proud Guildmaster for PS4 Team Fencebane. Rank 5 Officer for PC Team Fencebane. Visit us at http://fencebane.shivtr.com
This discussion has been closed.