test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

New Paragon Paths problems

jp250jp250 Member Posts: 17 Arc User
edited December 2013 in The Militia Barracks
And as for the GF are worsened because the verdaed GF has not had a new paragon . Fluorish , WMS really serious ? So playing with our guys ? Let me clarify further, which lead to change a skill with knockback, prone, multi target, AP generation, and ready for another anim
Post edited by jp250 on

Comments

  • jp250jp250 Member Posts: 17 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Hello , my name Shisy set since the beta colsed GF and I have always followed the changes in the game , 've seen many worse things in the game but most redone or improved atravas feedback here in the forum , so I come here to vent/complain this new way that gave the paragons mainly GWF and GF .
    First point I wanted to emphasize is that do not want to nerf but none that were better thought out and from the test that had already been disapproved by many reasons and they put on live .
    GWF were already very bad , mainly because of bugs and nerfs , but was currently balanced , with access now to the new paragon gf turned perma knockback , and prone and multitarget this is bad stunlock is very well that most are sentinel then it becomes a game of pushing worse than many complained about the GF because they have one more prone enconto , the roar combo roar+Frontiline+Takedown+Indomitable Strength they reign tancam out that much without limitation guada , and then expect it will become problem to modify ? Not to mention the rough animation, and rush to the frontline are shield was horrible, but that's just one detail .
  • godlysoul1godlysoul1 Member Posts: 293 Bounty Hunter
    edited December 2013
    Originial GWF path = PvE focus
    Original GF path = PvP focus

    Yes, GWF is going to become better at PvP by switching paths, but will also become worse at PvE. If GF chose to switch paths, they will become worse at PvP and better at PvE. Your argument is that you are frustrated GWF became better at PvP and GF didn't, but this was just because of balancing the paths that each could take, not because they tried to buffed GWF more than GF. You are neglecting PvE aspects.
  • burkaancburkaanc Member Posts: 2,186 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    nope, IV is better for both pvp and pve, especially after they destroyed wms
    Paladin Master Race
  • gannicsgladiatorgannicsgladiator Member Posts: 413 Bounty Hunter
    edited December 2013
    i have seen several good tanky gfs using swordmaster, and in pvp they are still the king of controlling the node.
    Dovahkiin Gannicus, GWF Sentinel- Enemy Team Guild
    Gannicus Destroyer, GWF Destroyer retired
    Kate Beckinsale NB DC, Link NB GF
    "There is only one way to be a champion..., Never ...ing lose"
Sign In or Register to comment.