test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Best Of
Re: Cleric healing 2024 look into it, ty
She was one of the best healers (cleric) in our Alliance. Because of the changes that were done and the weakening of the cleric class, that character is now rarely seen. Pretty much the reason why my cleric stays in DPS mode when he's used.
greywynd
1
Elemental Strands - give us somewhere (else) to turn them in
This event keeps happening.. 
almost everyone has maxed out these ..
and Box of Elemental Strands drops almost every Random dung so we have stacks of them and they're useless.
Give us some sort of exchange or let us turn into the SH coffer like the chrome strands.
almost everyone has maxed out these ..
and Box of Elemental Strands drops almost every Random dung so we have stacks of them and they're useless.
Give us some sort of exchange or let us turn into the SH coffer like the chrome strands.
b0rkch0p
1
No, Neverwinter and Star Trek Online Aren’t Shutting Down Anytime Soon
Leaving this article here in case someone is worried that the game is shutting down. https://mmorpg.gg/no-neverwinter-and-star-trek-online-arent-shutting-down-anytime-soon/.
The most interesting part is the comparison to New World which is only available through Steam and doesn't have its own launcher like Neverwinter or STO. So if you combine the Arc Launcher numbers (which are likely higher that the Steam numbers) with the Steam numbers, the population for Neverwinter and STO are probably not that much lower than New World, which also has a much bigger budget and team behind it.
The most interesting part is the comparison to New World which is only available through Steam and doesn't have its own launcher like Neverwinter or STO. So if you combine the Arc Launcher numbers (which are likely higher that the Steam numbers) with the Steam numbers, the population for Neverwinter and STO are probably not that much lower than New World, which also has a much bigger budget and team behind it.
daneril
1
Re: Unbind Tokens
To be able to say they did "something"? (even though that something is quite limited in it's capacity)
Wasn't even upset after buying a Tiamat's Arcane Globe and finding out it couldn't be unbound LoL. More so quite pleased now because it's currently going for over twice the amount paid.
Thought about suggesting character bound equipment being able to be unbound to account bound, then decided against it because it would go along with "create a problem and sell the solution".
Wasn't even upset after buying a Tiamat's Arcane Globe and finding out it couldn't be unbound LoL. More so quite pleased now because it's currently going for over twice the amount paid.
Thought about suggesting character bound equipment being able to be unbound to account bound, then decided against it because it would go along with "create a problem and sell the solution".
Re: ECC Legit 100% Done. Don't give up.
And I think that every mmo game should have a fight which average Joe wont cope with and which provides a challenge for whole group - thats called end game.
The thing with eCC (and T2s in general) is that they are horribly unrewarding and this is what needs to change, not the difficulty.
Congrats on clear with legit party. And when you upload video dont care that people will pick on everything they feel is cheating, just because 2k average Joe probably wont have it. I remember 1st Traven video uploaded on forums - people went crazy on... Lostmauth Set on GWF! Looking forward to see your strategy to beat him and good luck with next Legit runs
The thing with eCC (and T2s in general) is that they are horribly unrewarding and this is what needs to change, not the difficulty.
Congrats on clear with legit party. And when you upload video dont care that people will pick on everything they feel is cheating, just because 2k average Joe probably wont have it. I remember 1st Traven video uploaded on forums - people went crazy on... Lostmauth Set on GWF! Looking forward to see your strategy to beat him and good luck with next Legit runs
wentris
1
Re: Chance to upgrade enchantment is bugged
Hmmm... I think there are two misunderstandings here
First, the chance of success is 21%. They recently updated the lower rank enchantment upgrades, so I think the base chance from rare to epic is 20%, +1% from the green mote. And you're right, 29 failures is ridiculously unlucky... it's almost like it's not even "rolling the dice" each time.
Second, the guaranteed upgrade figure is a counter, not a probability... so it's 29 out of 150 attempts. It has no effect until it gets to 150, and then it sets the chance of success to 100%.
When it was first introduced the counter was related to the chance of success and it was set to 1.5 times the expected number of attempts... so for 10% chance it was out of 15 (10*1.5), and for 5% chance it was 30 (20*1.5). For 1% (which used to be the chance for the top rank of enchantment upgrades) it was 150 (100*1.5). You can still see this for artifact upgrades.
But after they re-did enchantments, all enchantments had a 0% base chance and you had to use a mote... and they just left the guaranteed upgrade counter at 150. It only ever goes up by 1 as well, which isn't really fair if you are using higher value motes.
And now after re-doing enchantments again, and giving higher chances for lower level upgrades, the counter is still left at 150.
So there are bugs I suppose... the guaranteed upgrade counter doesn't reflect the chance of success, meaning the "streak breaker" is much harsher than it used to be. And whatever might be wrong with the random number generator as well... probably a whole other thread
Also, I don't think there is harm putting a stack of motes there, but I think only one will ever be used (when the upgrade succeeds).
That's how I understand it...
First, the chance of success is 21%. They recently updated the lower rank enchantment upgrades, so I think the base chance from rare to epic is 20%, +1% from the green mote. And you're right, 29 failures is ridiculously unlucky... it's almost like it's not even "rolling the dice" each time.
Second, the guaranteed upgrade figure is a counter, not a probability... so it's 29 out of 150 attempts. It has no effect until it gets to 150, and then it sets the chance of success to 100%.
When it was first introduced the counter was related to the chance of success and it was set to 1.5 times the expected number of attempts... so for 10% chance it was out of 15 (10*1.5), and for 5% chance it was 30 (20*1.5). For 1% (which used to be the chance for the top rank of enchantment upgrades) it was 150 (100*1.5). You can still see this for artifact upgrades.
But after they re-did enchantments, all enchantments had a 0% base chance and you had to use a mote... and they just left the guaranteed upgrade counter at 150. It only ever goes up by 1 as well, which isn't really fair if you are using higher value motes.
And now after re-doing enchantments again, and giving higher chances for lower level upgrades, the counter is still left at 150.
So there are bugs I suppose... the guaranteed upgrade counter doesn't reflect the chance of success, meaning the "streak breaker" is much harsher than it used to be. And whatever might be wrong with the random number generator as well... probably a whole other thread
Also, I don't think there is harm putting a stack of motes there, but I think only one will ever be used (when the upgrade succeeds).
That's how I understand it...
mintmark
1
Re: Warlock Overhaul
So in short you want that warlock would be wizard??totally agree with idea of SW being unique in its role - focus on dps, not mimic some other class with CC etc.
Soulweaver is good example what happens if you try convert one class to do what other class do..
Soulweaver powers mimic/copy what paldin/cleric powers do.. And how it ended up?? Well, in mod 16~17 soulweaver was brushed aside as irrelevant class.
Cleric have higher magnitudes and can regenerate divinity by holding TAB.. Warlock can't do that... Also warlocks barrier override other shield and even own barier...
So in attempt to mimic paladin shield all get messed up...
So do you want same outcome for Hellbringer ( dps) warlocK??
If you have two or more classes who does same thing in same way,, players will pick one and discard others.. Thats general rule for all mmo rpg games.. That's why all classes are build to have slighly different play style, at least if you want to make them relevant..
Also just think for moment,, if you have warlock who does same thing ( CC fiesta) and wizard does same thing.. Then one class get picked by players and other get sacrificed..
That is not a balance..
Quick story about warlock... When it was introduced in mod 4.. ( hellbringer path). Unlike Wizard who had lot of CC, x4 encounter slots and fast casting. I t had massive damage per hit, longer cool downs and curse (legacy tab mechanic) to boost up dealt dmg further. But also in exchange warlock lacked CC.
And in that time, we lacked CC for real.
We had only 2 CC encounters, warith shadow ( legacy) and Harrostorm( legacy)..
Harrowstorm.
https://neverwinter.fandom.com/wiki/Harrowstorm_(SW)
Aoe fire dps, and if apply curse ( legacy tab key mechanic) dps effect converted to single target CC...
For most time, it was unpractical to use this encounter for CC.. And even for dps was not so grea, cuz you could not boost up dealt dmg via curse..
And second CC was, Wraith Shadow -
https://neverwinter.fandom.com/wiki/Wraith's_Shadow_(SW)
You apply curse, then cast this encounter and then recast/activate it. And you get ~1.2s AoE CC. And all casting time to reach it was like 4s. So 4s to get 1s CC.. That was a suicide in pvp.. And also to call it AoE was more a joke.. At best 3 enemies get CC nothing more.. But even this CC was like tiny/mini lag spike than real CC..
So as you can see, at that time we indeed lacked CC..
The Arm of Hadar and Hadar Grasp were added in mod 6. When lv cap got increased from 60 to 70 . And after life steal ( legacy mechanic) nerf warlocks was in so bad postion, that roughly 80~85% of all warlocks either quit game or moved to other classes.
So developers added additional CC abilties..
Now Hadar Grasp story is very simple.. It is coppy of Wizards Etangling Force encounters... But in excahnge of that, wizard got DIsintigrate which if you notice using kinda same mechanic as warlocks killing flame encounter...
And as for Arm of Hadar its simply attempt to mimic same effect as wizards legacy encounter Shard of the Endless Avalanche.
Then main thing was that Warlock lesser CC but more dps.
Wizard more CC but lesser dmg..
So do warlocks lack CC?
For Soulweavers I think could be done. But not just bluntly add CC.
Here is example.Lets take Wraith Shadow- Rework so it would use same aim/target mechanic as Hellbringer warlocks Hellfire ring ( cast to pointed area).
And instead casting hellfire, soulweaver would cast pool of shadows, which would use Spider web mechanic.. That's mean slow down enemies within it's effect area... Also syphoning enemies HP and restoring alies HP..
KInda Vampiric embrace but work as DoT..
Also as for consideration can be added that affected enemies would also do reduced damage.. So it would be usefull not just agains adds/trash in dungeons, but also would be usefull against CC immune enemies like bosses or golems...
Also it's free of Soulweave use, Aka regular cool down and etc.
Now as you notice, I made it locked for Soulweaver only, so it will not make different for Hellbringer..
Other thing this mean this encounter will give additional healing power which would not be locked to Soulweave mechanic( rescource).
And main thing is that thing encounter would provide heal/cc but in slighly different way as how other classes do..
The reason why temptation warlock were popular is not due insane healing.. Paladins could reach similar healing anyways.. But cuz it was doing all in different way then Cleric or paladin. It was healing via dps, and supporting via debufing.
With mod 16 it was attempt to rework Soulweaver to do healing in same way as how cleric/paladin do.. And it was whole reason why in mod 16~17 was pushed aside and irrelevant class.
Why play with clone who try mimic something, if you play original anyways???
Also adding more CC to Hellbringer, it will not make it do more dmg... Instead try look way to match up x class in dps, make sure that x class powers work how it should in first place. Cuz otherwise any attempt to balance broken class is nothing more but try build house on quicksand. Good attempt but always end up in bad way.
I understand that ohh but Warlock seems doing less dmg.. I see that. While this game is not my main does not mean I do not log in time to time. To check whats going on..
And I can assure you, the whole reason why wizards does massive dmg, why rogues does massive damage and even ranger and bard can do big dmg, is cuz some game mechanics are broken.
And one mechanic actually is also responsable why there are times that players got oneshoted.
But if devs fix these game mechanics, all class balances issues with reset. And all will start fall in their suposed postions..
another thing I really want to see is being support not in general/typical way, but via debuff/buff/dps etc - it sounds SOOOOO way more interesting.
Good story, very good!
mopc20
1
Re: Warlock Overhaul
So in short you want that warlock would be wizard??
Soulweaver is good example what happens if you try convert one class to do what other class do..
Soulweaver powers mimic/copy what paldin/cleric powers do.. And how it ended up?? Well, in mod 16~17 soulweaver was brushed aside as irrelevant class.
Cleric have higher magnitudes and can regenerate divinity by holding TAB.. Warlock can't do that... Also warlocks barrier override other shield and even own barier...
So in attempt to mimic paladin shield all get messed up...
So do you want same outcome for Hellbringer ( dps) warlocK??
If you have two or more classes who does same thing in same way,, players will pick one and discard others.. Thats general rule for all mmo rpg games.. That's why all classes are build to have slighly different play style, at least if you want to make them relevant..
Also just think for moment,, if you have warlock who does same thing ( CC fiesta) and wizard does same thing.. Then one class get picked by players and other get sacrificed..
That is not a balance..
Quick story about warlock... When it was introduced in mod 4.. ( hellbringer path). Unlike Wizard who had lot of CC, x4 encounter slots and fast casting. I t had massive damage per hit, longer cool downs and curse (legacy tab mechanic) to boost up dealt dmg further. But also in exchange warlock lacked CC.
And in that time, we lacked CC for real.
We had only 2 CC encounters, warith shadow ( legacy) and Harrostorm( legacy)..
Harrowstorm.
https://neverwinter.fandom.com/wiki/Harrowstorm_(SW)
Aoe fire dps, and if apply curse ( legacy tab key mechanic) dps effect converted to single target CC...
For most time, it was unpractical to use this encounter for CC.. And even for dps was not so grea, cuz you could not boost up dealt dmg via curse..
And second CC was, Wraith Shadow -
https://neverwinter.fandom.com/wiki/Wraith's_Shadow_(SW)
You apply curse, then cast this encounter and then recast/activate it. And you get ~1.2s AoE CC. And all casting time to reach it was like 4s. So 4s to get 1s CC.. That was a suicide in pvp.. And also to call it AoE was more a joke.. At best 3 enemies get CC nothing more.. But even this CC was like tiny/mini lag spike than real CC..
So as you can see, at that time we indeed lacked CC..
The Arm of Hadar and Hadar Grasp were added in mod 6. When lv cap got increased from 60 to 70 . And after life steal ( legacy mechanic) nerf warlocks was in so bad postion, that roughly 80~85% of all warlocks either quit game or moved to other classes.
So developers added additional CC abilties..
Now Hadar Grasp story is very simple.. It is coppy of Wizards Etangling Force encounters... But in excahnge of that, wizard got DIsintigrate which if you notice using kinda same mechanic as warlocks killing flame encounter... Cuz at that time wizard lacked strong dps powers...
And as for Arm of Hadar its simply attempt to mimic same effect as wizards legacy encounter Shard of the Endless Avalanche.
Then main thing was that Warlock lesser CC but more dps.
Wizard more CC but lesser dmg..
So do warlocks lack CC?
For Soulweavers I think could be done. But not just bluntly add CC.
Here is example.
Now as you notice, I made it locked for Soulweaver only, so it will not make different for Hellbringer..
Other thing this mean this encounter will give additional healing power which would not be locked to Soulweave mechanic( rescource).
And main thing is that thing encounter would provide heal/cc but in slighly different way as how other classes do..
The reason why temptation warlock were popular is not due insane healing.. Paladins could reach similar healing anyways.. But cuz it was doing all in different way then Cleric or paladin. It was healing via dps, and supporting via debufing.
With mod 16 it was attempt to rework Soulweaver to do healing in same way as how cleric/paladin do.. And it was whole reason why in mod 16~17 was pushed aside and irrelevant class.
Why play with clone who try mimic something, if you play original anyways???
Also adding more CC to Hellbringer, it will not make it do more dmg... Instead try look way to match up x class in dps, make sure that x class powers work how it should in first place. Cuz otherwise any attempt to balance broken class is nothing more but try build house on quicksand. Good attempt but always end up in bad way.
I understand that ohh but Warlock seems doing less dmg.. I see that. While this game is not my main does not mean I do not log in time to time. To check whats going on..
And I can assure you, the whole reason why wizards does massive dmg, why rogues does massive damage and even ranger and bard can do big dmg, is cuz some game mechanics are broken.
And one mechanic actually is also responsable why there are times that players got oneshoted.
But if devs fix these game mechanics, all class balances issues with reset. And all will start fall in their suposed postions..
Soulweaver is good example what happens if you try convert one class to do what other class do..
Soulweaver powers mimic/copy what paldin/cleric powers do.. And how it ended up?? Well, in mod 16~17 soulweaver was brushed aside as irrelevant class.
Cleric have higher magnitudes and can regenerate divinity by holding TAB.. Warlock can't do that... Also warlocks barrier override other shield and even own barier...
So in attempt to mimic paladin shield all get messed up...
So do you want same outcome for Hellbringer ( dps) warlocK??
If you have two or more classes who does same thing in same way,, players will pick one and discard others.. Thats general rule for all mmo rpg games.. That's why all classes are build to have slighly different play style, at least if you want to make them relevant..
Also just think for moment,, if you have warlock who does same thing ( CC fiesta) and wizard does same thing.. Then one class get picked by players and other get sacrificed..
That is not a balance..
Quick story about warlock... When it was introduced in mod 4.. ( hellbringer path). Unlike Wizard who had lot of CC, x4 encounter slots and fast casting. I t had massive damage per hit, longer cool downs and curse (legacy tab mechanic) to boost up dealt dmg further. But also in exchange warlock lacked CC.
And in that time, we lacked CC for real.
We had only 2 CC encounters, warith shadow ( legacy) and Harrostorm( legacy)..
Harrowstorm.
https://neverwinter.fandom.com/wiki/Harrowstorm_(SW)
Aoe fire dps, and if apply curse ( legacy tab key mechanic) dps effect converted to single target CC...
For most time, it was unpractical to use this encounter for CC.. And even for dps was not so grea, cuz you could not boost up dealt dmg via curse..
And second CC was, Wraith Shadow -
https://neverwinter.fandom.com/wiki/Wraith's_Shadow_(SW)
You apply curse, then cast this encounter and then recast/activate it. And you get ~1.2s AoE CC. And all casting time to reach it was like 4s. So 4s to get 1s CC.. That was a suicide in pvp.. And also to call it AoE was more a joke.. At best 3 enemies get CC nothing more.. But even this CC was like tiny/mini lag spike than real CC..
So as you can see, at that time we indeed lacked CC..
The Arm of Hadar and Hadar Grasp were added in mod 6. When lv cap got increased from 60 to 70 . And after life steal ( legacy mechanic) nerf warlocks was in so bad postion, that roughly 80~85% of all warlocks either quit game or moved to other classes.
So developers added additional CC abilties..
Now Hadar Grasp story is very simple.. It is coppy of Wizards Etangling Force encounters... But in excahnge of that, wizard got DIsintigrate which if you notice using kinda same mechanic as warlocks killing flame encounter...
Cuz at that time wizard lacked strong dps powers... And as for Arm of Hadar its simply attempt to mimic same effect as wizards legacy encounter Shard of the Endless Avalanche.
Then main thing was that Warlock lesser CC but more dps.
Wizard more CC but lesser dmg..
So do warlocks lack CC?
For Soulweavers I think could be done. But not just bluntly add CC.
Here is example.
Lets take Wraith Shadow- Rework so it would use same aim/target mechanic as Hellbringer warlocks Hellfire ring ( cast to pointed area).
And instead casting hellfire, soulweaver would cast pool of shadows, which would use Spider web mechanic.. That's mean slow down enemies within it's effect area... Also syphoning enemies HP and restoring alies HP..
KInda Vampiric embrace but work as DoT..
Also as for consideration can be added that affected enemies would also do reduced damage.. So it would be usefull not just agains adds/trash in dungeons, but also would be usefull against CC immune enemies like bosses or golems...
Also it's free of Soulweave use, Aka regular cool down and etc.
And instead casting hellfire, soulweaver would cast pool of shadows, which would use Spider web mechanic.. That's mean slow down enemies within it's effect area... Also syphoning enemies HP and restoring alies HP..
KInda Vampiric embrace but work as DoT..
Also as for consideration can be added that affected enemies would also do reduced damage.. So it would be usefull not just agains adds/trash in dungeons, but also would be usefull against CC immune enemies like bosses or golems...
Also it's free of Soulweave use, Aka regular cool down and etc.
Now as you notice, I made it locked for Soulweaver only, so it will not make different for Hellbringer..
Other thing this mean this encounter will give additional healing power which would not be locked to Soulweave mechanic( rescource).
And main thing is that thing encounter would provide heal/cc but in slighly different way as how other classes do..
The reason why temptation warlock were popular is not due insane healing.. Paladins could reach similar healing anyways.. But cuz it was doing all in different way then Cleric or paladin. It was healing via dps, and supporting via debufing.
With mod 16 it was attempt to rework Soulweaver to do healing in same way as how cleric/paladin do.. And it was whole reason why in mod 16~17 was pushed aside and irrelevant class.
Why play with clone who try mimic something, if you play original anyways???
Also adding more CC to Hellbringer, it will not make it do more dmg... Instead try look way to match up x class in dps, make sure that x class powers work how it should in first place. Cuz otherwise any attempt to balance broken class is nothing more but try build house on quicksand. Good attempt but always end up in bad way.
I understand that ohh but Warlock seems doing less dmg.. I see that. While this game is not my main does not mean I do not log in time to time. To check whats going on..
And I can assure you, the whole reason why wizards does massive dmg, why rogues does massive damage and even ranger and bard can do big dmg, is cuz some game mechanics are broken.
And one mechanic actually is also responsable why there are times that players got oneshoted.
But if devs fix these game mechanics, all class balances issues with reset. And all will start fall in their suposed postions..
Warlock Overhaul
Hello Everyone:
Its been a while since I've posted. But after my return, I started thinking of warlock's encounters, at-wills, and daily abilities in comparison with other classes. As we know, they are only two classes with "control" features embedded in them for AoE purposes - Wizards and Rangers. Wizards can freeze, slow, stunt, lift, and knock players off balance - All while making powers fluid in usage w/o being stuck in animation due to lack of animations. Rangers can trapped, slow, and stunt NPCs - Also empower players with CA, and defense which is great!
Warlocks have in essence derailed from their purpose in D&D environment. Their ghastly pet isn't much use - hence why class feature to remain permanently active isn't selected. Furthermore, lack of damage in ST and AOE leaves much to be desired. In any event, the purpose is not to talk about pet but rather powers warlocks can be invested to be given usage in AoE and ST other than DPS for crowd control purposes.
Current CC we have:
Hadars' Grasp - decent, low base dmg, holding timer is low in comparison to Wizards. ST
Arms of Hadars - Cumbersome, useless power, its timer stacking functionality is horrible. Front Cone - AOE - Does not take SS into consideration to reduce its timer.
It would be interesting to modify warlocks to reduce awareness and accuracy off mobs. For instance, our curse can reduce a mob's awareness and accuracy in addition to making it susceptible to our damage. A trigger of disorientation similar to the "scare" power some mobs execute at the AoE level. We need these long animations to be removed or reduced and provide some fluid functions to our powers: Arms is horrendous; Hellring is clumsy; Infernal Flames does not do the damage it claims, Dreadtheft SHOULD be a radiating blast. No powers should last longer than 0.5-0.7 to cast.
Our dailies are a joke too: Only two dailies are worth using - Soul Siphon (AoE) and Tyrannical Curse (ST/AoE blend for boss). I would like Gates of Hell to be AoE based like 30'-50' to sucking everyone up to the center (gates) and knocking them - As oppose to its current form which is clumsy and difficult to cast, plus takes a lot of time. Brood of Hadars & Flames of Phlegethos are not true to their damage. One of these two, should be a ST HIGH instant damage.
In any event, these are some of the issues I've been thinking. I can go into more details, but again...
A wishful warlock,
-Legend
Its been a while since I've posted. But after my return, I started thinking of warlock's encounters, at-wills, and daily abilities in comparison with other classes. As we know, they are only two classes with "control" features embedded in them for AoE purposes - Wizards and Rangers. Wizards can freeze, slow, stunt, lift, and knock players off balance - All while making powers fluid in usage w/o being stuck in animation due to lack of animations. Rangers can trapped, slow, and stunt NPCs - Also empower players with CA, and defense which is great!
Warlocks have in essence derailed from their purpose in D&D environment. Their ghastly pet isn't much use - hence why class feature to remain permanently active isn't selected. Furthermore, lack of damage in ST and AOE leaves much to be desired. In any event, the purpose is not to talk about pet but rather powers warlocks can be invested to be given usage in AoE and ST other than DPS for crowd control purposes.
Current CC we have:
Hadars' Grasp - decent, low base dmg, holding timer is low in comparison to Wizards. ST
Arms of Hadars - Cumbersome, useless power, its timer stacking functionality is horrible. Front Cone - AOE - Does not take SS into consideration to reduce its timer.
It would be interesting to modify warlocks to reduce awareness and accuracy off mobs. For instance, our curse can reduce a mob's awareness and accuracy in addition to making it susceptible to our damage. A trigger of disorientation similar to the "scare" power some mobs execute at the AoE level. We need these long animations to be removed or reduced and provide some fluid functions to our powers: Arms is horrendous; Hellring is clumsy; Infernal Flames does not do the damage it claims, Dreadtheft SHOULD be a radiating blast. No powers should last longer than 0.5-0.7 to cast.
Our dailies are a joke too: Only two dailies are worth using - Soul Siphon (AoE) and Tyrannical Curse (ST/AoE blend for boss). I would like Gates of Hell to be AoE based like 30'-50' to sucking everyone up to the center (gates) and knocking them - As oppose to its current form which is clumsy and difficult to cast, plus takes a lot of time. Brood of Hadars & Flames of Phlegethos are not true to their damage. One of these two, should be a ST HIGH instant damage.
In any event, these are some of the issues I've been thinking. I can go into more details, but again...
A wishful warlock,
-Legend
Fighter Changes
Guys you made some changes on previev, and with these changes is impossible to hold Vengance bar above 75% constantly. consumption is way too big, or maybe it is some bug? Do you want for fighters to not fighting with mobs during Dungeon but to load up Vengance bar. because for example Onslought can eat 50% of vengance bar- Guys this is one skill, and after one skill half of Vengance bar is gone, please be serious or you will kill this class completly.
modlesie
1