test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

give us a vehicle weapon exchange for nerfed weapons

jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,366 Arc User
edited October 2014 in Suggestions Box
in the past players have gotten refunds for prototype vehicles. now with the amount of q involved
that would be too much to refund.
my suggestion is give us an in game vendor that allows us to exchange plasma beams for different weapons. this would be in the spirit of retcons when other powers are nerfed. allow us to redo our vehicles.
i realize that balancing was in order but allow us to retcon our vehicles please.
Post edited by jasinblaze on

Comments

  • chalupaoffurychalupaoffury Posts: 2,559 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    I'd even be ok with the hellacious grind to get enough q to unbind all 8 million of them I have if this were possible.
    In game, I am @EvilTaco. Happily killing purple gang members since May 2008.
    dbnzfo.png
    RIP Caine
  • crypticbuxomcrypticbuxom Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Considering the hundreds that people have spent (yes there are players who spend hundreds of dollars worth on these) there should be a temporary way to return the vehicle weapons for even a fraction of the questionite total.
  • soulforgersoulforger Posts: 1,654 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    I agree with this idea.
  • edited October 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • nbkxsnbkxs Posts: 776 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Please do, I'd like to trade in my aa missles, and my plasma beams.

    XS
    [NbK]XStorm
  • flowcytoflowcyto Posts: 12,859 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    It would also be nice if the more detailed tooltips were given for them by default. Spending that much Q or resources w/o much info to go on is a bit disingenuous and not in line w/ how gear and power tooltips work.
    <CO stuff> .: Petco :. // A basic FF building guide (see 1st reply) // PSA on Power Activation Delay // Ayonachan's Gift Horse (misc stat data)
    - Be safe and have fun, champs - for science!
  • ashensnowashensnow Posts: 2,048 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Personally I think that refunds are in order due to the amount of money being mentioned as having been spent on the nerfed vehicle components.

    'Caine, miss you bud. Fly high.
  • galantdramongalantdramon Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Warning: Wall of Text

    People are screaming and crying about "losing their time/money/etc" with the loss of Plasma Beam (or more correctly, Shared Plasma Shear Stacking).

    By itself, solo, it was a decent weapon...even the stacking was okay. The problem was the stacking of 'shear' was shared. Mine, yours, his, all added together, giving massive dps in groups.

    Any ability, power, gear, clicky device, etc, that lets a toon just out of the tutorial -beat- a carefully min/maxed dps endgame power toon in a damage race is almost certainly either bugged, or being combined with something allowing bugged behavior.

    Any trick that lets a tutorial level toon "out gun" an end game power dps toon, that is in fact so powerful, that if you don't have it, you will lose, is almost certainly broken.

    "Everyone" knew it, people in /zone, /trade and /rampagers were crowing about it, and all the people that were after it had to be able to see that something had to be wrong with it.

    I'd bet good money, that the majority of people using it -knew- that it was broken, and that the shared shear stacking was pretty much an exploit move...but -everyone- knew that if dps matters, and it's "outside", its "Go Plasma Shear or Go Home".

    Did I use it? Heck yes, PBr2, from a vehicle I purchaced, so I could "keep up with the joneses". PB3 honestly wasn't needed, it was never about the weapon, it was always about the Shear.

    Do I "want my money back" from "the cruel, heartless, meanie-faces" at Cryptic/PWE for "taking my totally not broken toy away from me"? Not really.

    Sure, some people blew tons of globals or questonite or salvage getting those things.

    However, to say "here, have all your money back, in whatever form, as an apology from us to you, for our stopping an exploit item" is the wrong thing to do.

    Pretty much everyone knew it was broken, knew it was an exploit of a bugged mechanic, and didn't care...you wanted to "win" you needed the silly thing.

    It wasn't until the stupid thing BROKE THE GAME that it was dealt with. Until the anniversary event, and the old "600+ total stacks of -anything- breaks the damage" bug was shoved in people's faces, did anything change.

    It wasn't shear that did it, it's an old base code thing, too many effects, of any kind, from any source, and the game can't track damage done to the target. It was only everyone and their roboguppy using that one trick (with the cumulative stacks on target) that forced the issue to be confronted.

    If a "refund" is offered, for people having a -known- (by the devs, even if "they" honestly didn't know and never considered) exploit device fixed, then it says "go ahead, exploit, cheat, etc, and we'll reward you for doing so".

    Did they over-correct plasma beam? IMO yes, the cost/dmg adjustments -plus- taking shear away, are too much.

    Do they "owe us" for "unfairly taking away our hard earned stuff" by making Plasma Beam "useless"? IMO no, too many people knew it was an exploit, and were too public about the subject, for me to believe that the majority of people throwing money (game or RW) at the item didn't know it would eventually be "fixed".

    tl;dr
    The power was bugged, most of us knew, the rest didn't want to. They fixed it, why should they "recompense us" for fixing an exploit we were hammering?
  • edited October 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • novaninja555novaninja555 Posts: 839 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    I don't mind a refund on my vehicles at 1000 z per vehicle + 200 z per extra weapon. I would have enough z for the next FF slot sale!:biggrin:

    "Good can be found in heights, even in the deepest pits of evil" but "The valleys of evil always exist in the mountains of good."

    ~me
  • crypticbuxomcrypticbuxom Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    snip

    Plasma Beam's overpowering output for Vehicle Mark 2s was reported on PTS well before it went live. Cryptic assured us that in that state it was working as intended.

    That defeats your entire argument.
  • aiqaaiqa Posts: 2,620 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Plasma Beam's overpowering output for Vehicle Mark 2s was reported on PTS well before it went live. Cryptic assured us that in that state it was working as intended.

    That defeats your entire argument.

    Link?
    ....
  • quasimojo1quasimojo1 Posts: 642 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Regardless of what Cryptic may or may not have explicitly said, they did do a major balancing pass on vehicle weapons, including a fix to plasma sheer stacking, back in in March. They then offered an upgraded Mark 3 version for sale that did increased damage. I think it would be a reasonable expectation by players that it was working as intended at that point, even more so 6 months later.

    Most importantly, as many others have said, some method of exchanging retroactively rebalanced cash shop items negates the reason for these kinds of threads. It's just a good idea for a lot of reasons:
    - Players shouldn't have to be the ones to pay for admitted dev team mistakes.
    - Players will not only feel better about this situation, they'll feel more confidant about future purchases.
    - Eliminates even the perception of bait-and-switch.
    - Provides a little more of an incentive for the developers to get cash shop items right the first time (or at least the 2nd or 3rd time).
    LTS since 2009. Author of ACT parser module for CO. Founder of Rampagers. Resident curmudgeon.

    "Without data, you're just another person with an opinion." -- W. Edwards Deming
  • aiqaaiqa Posts: 2,620 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    quasimojo1 wrote: »
    Regardless of what Cryptic may or may not have said, they did do a major balancing pass on vehicle weapons, including a fix to plasma sheer stacking, back in in March. They then offered an upgraded Mark 3 version for sale that did increased damage. I think it would be a reasonable expectation by players that it was working as intended at that point, even more so 6 months later.

    I fully agree it's reasonable to make such an assumption, but my point was we can't say things like "they promised this and that" when that never happened.

    As for the current balance, I think none disagrees the energy cost is too high now (even Kaiserin said so while she's been the most vocal about wanting PB changed). If PB is truly considered a useless weapon now, I think it would be easier and better for both cryptic and players to revert the energy cost changes then to implement "new tech" for exchanging weapons.
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,366 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Whether you agree with the nerf or not. Broken or not. Exploitive or not. Retcons have always came with character changes in the past. Exchanging the weapons would be a retcon of sorts.
  • serpinecohserpinecoh Posts: 359 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    jasinblaze wrote: »
    Whether you agree with the nerf or not. Broken or not. Exploitive or not. Retcons have always came with character changes in the past. Exchanging the weapons would be a retcon of sorts.
    I wouldn't take advantage of such a program but I fully support one. A true refund would bring some economy flooding issues into the mix, but a direct exchange would be a matter of swapping similarly valued gear and would purely be about allowing people to function under the "new normal". It is a simple and fair solution.
  • galantdramongalantdramon Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Plasma Beam's overpowering output for Vehicle Mark 2s was reported on PTS well before it went live. Cryptic assured us that in that state it was working as intended.

    That defeats your entire argument.

    Plasma Beam has never been overpowered, the Plasma Shear however has always been bugged in that it stacks and shares with everyone else using Plasma Beam.

    I would like the link about how "yes, everyone can share plasma shear, this is working as intended though" when I know for a fact (they fixed it recently, there's my fact, link to follow) that it was broken.

    http://co-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?p=4462151#post4462151

    Scroll down, they took plasma shear out.

    Now, shear (not beam, just shear) has been known to be broken for some time, every day you could see conversations in /zone, /trade and /rampagers about it.

    Thus, with a decent level of accuracy, one can say "pretty much everyone knew, and either didn't care, or didn't want to know" about the fact that it was basically an exploit.

    People using it in large part knew, the devs knew and kept trying to make adjustments (why they didn't just get rid of it in the first place I don't know), and finally, they took it away.

    It was an exploit, like using a specific device and a specific power in a specific place in a specific combination to auto-win, and when they got rid of it, people that got the most powerful version of said exploit possible, want their money back.

    Everyone who was using it should have known they were going to get rid of it eventually, and either not gotten "the biggest, most expensive version" or said "okay, while it's there, I'll use it" and just accepted it would be taken away at some point.

    No game considers a device/power/etc that can allow tutorial level toons to outgun well equipped end game min/max toons "fair, balanced, and WAI". Why people expected CO to be different is beyond me.
  • crypticbuxomcrypticbuxom Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    When I say Plasma Beam, I say the whole power as a whole. Including all effects that the power itself applies.
  • kallethenkallethen Posts: 1,576 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    "Working as intended" at the time does not mean it doesn't need fixing if it becomes apparent that the intended functioning breaks game balance.

    That said, I'm not opposed to refunds.
    100% of the world is crazy, 95% are in denial.

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • xydaxydaxydaxyda Posts: 800 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Energy cost for plasma beam should be reduced(and damage increased possibly.) I cannot deny that this nerf was too heavy handed...but you are fooling yourselves if you didn't think plasma beam was OP.
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,366 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    xydaxyda wrote: »
    Energy cost for plasma beam should be reduced(and damage increased possibly.) I cannot deny that this nerf was too heavy handed...but you are fooling yourselves if you didn't think plasma beam was OP.

    this thread ins't about if the nerf was justified.
    i too thought plasma was OP
    but...
    this thread is about wanting an exchange
    stay on topic there are other threads to talk about whether the nerf was justified or not
    take your argument there
  • jimhsuajimhsua Posts: 412 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Supported.
  • galantdramongalantdramon Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    As Jasin said, this isn't about OP/WAI/etc, this is about "I want my money back" opinions.

    So, to get this back on topic (hopefully w/o WoT)...

    Data points I base my opinion on:

    1: The device "plasma beam"s secondary effect "plasma shear" was lauded by people in /zone, /trade and /rampagers as being "indispensable" for any situation where speed damage mattered.

    2: It was known that for "plasma shear" to be useful, you needed multiple people using plasma beam.

    3: It was possible to drop the Bleak Harbringer in the Lemurian Invasion Rampage in one cycle with a group of Plasma Beam vehicles...to the point that PQs (private queue) for that fight said "LFM # People, Must Have Vehicle w/Plasma Beam".

    4: So called "end game min/max'ers" in full teams of 5, could be routinely beaten in a dps race against a group of random mixed level toons who only had "in a vehicle with plasma beam" in common.

    5: Plasma Beam's secondary effect Plasma Shear was a "make or break" device...if you didn't have it, you would lose (or be excluded in the case of LI PQs).

    6: Plasma Beam was modified multiple times, trying to "fix shear"...and in the end, had 'plasma shear' removed.

    7: I have yet to see a verifiable instance of "yes, plasma shear, which can stack into the hundreds and cumulatively shares the effect with all other plasma beam users, is actually how it's supposed to be" from any Cryptic/PWE Dev.

    Conclusion: The device was working incorrectly, and was, after many attempts finally removed. (I say 'removed' as the current device bears only cosmetic relationship to the original.)

    Opinion: This sounds to me like "yes, this is an exploit" could be accurate.

    Thus, I say "no, cryptic/pwe doesn't 'owe' us a refund, nor do they 'owe' us a replacement". People should never expect 'compensation' for having an exploit fixed.
  • quasimojo1quasimojo1 Posts: 642 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    7: I have yet to see a verifiable instance of "yes, plasma shear, which can stack into the hundreds and cumulatively shares the effect with all other plasma beam users, is actually how it's supposed to be" from any Cryptic/PWE Dev.

    Conclusion: The device was working incorrectly, and was, after many attempts finally removed. (I say 'removed' as the current device bears only cosmetic relationship to the original.)

    Opinion: This sounds to me like "yes, this is an exploit" could be accurate.

    Thus, I say "no, cryptic/pwe doesn't 'owe' us a refund, nor do they 'owe' us a replacement". People should never expect 'compensation' for having an exploit fixed.

    The word "exploit" doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. It's like saying the use of Two-Gun Mojo is an exploit. The fact that developers were still unable to get the balance right after multiple reviews over the course of two years says more about the developers than the players. Players shouldn't have to be the ones that pay the price for Cryptic's admitted mistakes.

    I rarely respond to posts that are borderline troll-bait, but the fact that you're so vociferously opposed to players getting fair compensation that you would categorize them as exploiters makes me wonder where the hate is coming from. By the way, did you read Taco's farewell message?
    LTS since 2009. Author of ACT parser module for CO. Founder of Rampagers. Resident curmudgeon.

    "Without data, you're just another person with an opinion." -- W. Edwards Deming
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,366 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    quasimojo1 wrote: »
    The word "exploit" doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. It's like saying the use of Two-Gun Mojo is an exploit. The fact that developers were still unable to get the balance right after multiple reviews over the course of two years says more about the developers than the players. Players shouldn't have to be the ones that pay the price for Cryptic's admitted mistakes.

    I rarely respond to posts that are borderline troll-bait, but the fact that you're so vociferously opposed to players getting fair compensation that you would categorize them as exploiters makes me wonder where the hate is coming from. By the way, did you read Taco's farewell message?

    galant is as much saddened by taco's departure as anyone. I think he is responding reactively more to the why was it nerfed comments earlier. compensation would help the community much. there is a precedent for it.
  • spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,467 Arc User
    edited October 2014
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,366 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    spinnytop wrote: »
    ... why not just ask them to un-nerf the weapons?

    why not go to the thread already asking that instead of trolling and derailing?
  • edited October 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • jasinblazejasinblaze Posts: 1,366 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    When you see others using a device and being very effective, then you cough up 295K Q to acquire the same, only to see it rendered into worthless junk; yeah, you deserve a refund, and an apology for the inconvenience as well.

    This isn't even debatable for anyone with any sense of fairness.
    you are derailing as well

    this thread is asking for an exchange , why dont you make a post asking for a refund
  • spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,467 Arc User
    edited October 2014
  • crypticbuxomcrypticbuxom Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Cryptic, you guys need to serious consider this. It doesn't hurt you to give us an exchange for this considering that you already got the money from it. You're only hurting the players who spent hundreds of dollars if not more, preventing them from spending ever again and killing your future revenue.

    This argument is pointless though because companies NEVER think about future and overall revenue and only think about the dollar they can get right now. Its how economies die and the companies responsible crash and burns.
Sign In or Register to comment.