test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Grandfather in gold subscribers

stergasterga Posts: 2,353 Arc User
Let all gold subscribers keep all of their gold characters as gold characters even if their subscription expires.

Telling people to pony up $200/$300 to keep their gold characters as gold when life happens is an unbelievably trash way to treat people that gave you money. When Rift went F2P, I kept all of my character slots, bag slots, and role slots. I also got a bunch of credits to spend in the cash shop and gained some loyalty levels based on my past subscription time. And that was Trion. People hate Trion. Don't be worse than that.


And I would still like to see 800+ day gold subscribers just get their accounts updated to LTS. Those accounts are probably already messed up (I know mine is) because it is assumed by some of the coding that those people ARE LTS. And none of it to player benefit. I won't be surprised if more things get messed up with the sub update. None of it has been fixed in all of these years, it won't be fixed on June 7th. Anyone spending that much on gold subs has paid for a full price LTS and then some. Think of it as Rent-To-Own with interest.​​
YouTube - Steam - Twitter
[at]riviania Member since Aug 2009
«1

Comments

  • Options
    theravenforcetheravenforce Posts: 7,065 Arc User
    I have to agree.

    I think that there should be clear information on the following:

    1) If you are continuing your sub, and your card expires and you get a new one...where can this information be updated? Payments? If so, will it carry over for sub information if that service no longer exists?

    2) The conversion tokens mentioned in the news article...59 tokens should be free for players who are currently gold and lapse and then wish to continue playing as Gold.

    3) What is the aim of these changes?

    4) Why are we being notified so suddenly? Shouldn't this have been known at least several months ago? (Is this an indication of a restructure or a bad shift for CO?)

  • Options
    somebobsomebob Posts: 980 Arc User
    4) STO got the exact same amount of notice that we did (a week). The big difference is that a sub means so much less to them.
    Owner and Lead Moderator for the Primus Database. Post your Hero today!
    Razira's Primus Database Page
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    Why is it suddenly wrong for them to expect you to pay to maintain access to your FF characters? If you're a sub, then you've been paying to maintain access to them all this time. There's no reason they should suddenly become free because of this. I support them implementing some way to convert sub slots to ff slots, and have that way be something you have to pay for, cause that makes sense.
  • Options
    stergasterga Posts: 2,353 Arc User
    The option to maintain access is going away. If someone's sub lapses, they lose access to gold character they may have already paid $100s for until they drop $200-$300 dollars more on the game. There will be no option to re-sub. None. At all.

    Cryptic / PW clearly wants to dump the gold subs, which is fine, but this is a crap way to do it. Frankly, this would have gone over much better if subs were dropped 100% with no option to keep subbing and everyone that has a gold sub was simply grandfathered in, allowed to keep all of their gold toons as gold toon with extreme situations where sub time is equal to or greater than the cost of an LTS getting their account bumped up to LTS, which wouldn't even be a free upgrade, but one paid over time. Instead of losing access to all their gold toons as gold toons, they would lose a stipend they aren't paying for anyway.

    Grandfathering people into a new system is a goodwill gesture that shows the company actually cares about customer loyalty. This is just another corporation treating people like walking wallets.​​
    YouTube - Steam - Twitter
    [at]riviania Member since Aug 2009
  • Options
    xcelsior41xcelsior41 Posts: 1,056 Arc User
    spinnytop wrote: »
    Why is it suddenly wrong for them to expect you to pay to maintain access to your FF characters? If you're a sub, then you've been paying to maintain access to them all this time. There's no reason they should suddenly become free because of this. I support them implementing some way to convert sub slots to ff slots, and have that way be something you have to pay for, cause that makes sense.

    If by pay you mean dump $300, yeah you SHOULD be able to see why thats an issue.
    Buffing everything to stupid high levels and nerfing everything to piss poor levels yields the same results, but not the same community reactions.

    42 40s, LTSer.
  • Options
    riveroceanriverocean Posts: 1,690 Arc User
    I really don't think we will get grandfathered in.
    But I do feel as a long time customer I have the right to ask questions about a big change like this. $200 to $300 is a big investment to ask of players at the last minute.
    Questions About AT Play? Visit Silverwolfx11's Updated AT Guides!
  • Options
    magpieuk2014magpieuk2014 Posts: 1,268 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    Why is it suddenly wrong for them to expect you to pay to maintain access to your FF characters?

    Because they're asking subscribers to pay the same fee, on an inflexible basis, for much less value. It's a massive downgrade, and why should anyone be happy about that? If you've subscribed on a monthly basis for more than 725 days you've paid more than an LTS player would have done for their deal, and now you're being told you have to keep paying for less or lose the lot. That, frankly, stinks.
  • Options
    gentlegiantvexxgentlegiantvexx Posts: 321 Community Moderator
    +1 to the fullest on this one.
    I may not be subscribed as I was a perma silver, But I would really hate the vets of the game with 60+ toons over several years of playing CO just to be slapped in the face with such a bold and not well done move.
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    Same here, I've been Gold for at least 2 if not 3 years in total. I've bought stuff on the Z-store, as well. Sure I haven't reactivated my sub since 2017 or 2016, I don't remember exactly, but I've spent more than a LTS worth, that's also a fact.

    Hell I'm even considering to reactivate my subscription before the 7th just to give me one more month to think this through and see if PW/Cryptic is willing to do something about it.
  • Options
    themightyzeniththemightyzenith Posts: 4,599 Arc User
    :+1:

    I'm a gold sub and have been for years without lapsing my sub. Early on I managed to get a discounted monthly subscription and kept on that ever since.

    My personal reasons for staying on this monthly model is that I really don't notice paying just under $10 a month and $200/$300 would have been too big a chunk at once to justify it to myself. I didn't save up and wait until I had the necessary funds for an LTS because I wanted to play as a subscriber then and there and not wait months to do so.... free-form and character slots on reaching lvl 40 being my main motivation for subscribing.

    Obviously I have paid far, far more for my sub in the long run than an LTS but I was fine with that as I loved the game and didn't begrudge it. I also have had periods recent-ish where I wasn't very active and didn't play much for a month or two here and there. What kept me subscribing during these hiatus was the monthly gold bonus items (I had already achieved max vet rewards by that time).

    I haven't only paid for my sub though. I've bought a hell of a lot of Zen over the years.

    I know many people in-game that follow this model.
    zrdRBy8.png
    Click here to check out my costumes/milleniumguardian (MG) in-game/We need more tights, stances and moods
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    I jumped in game (with a silver character) just to be sure:

    a34b3949704817993fcc1389e53304ed.jpg

    So yeah, I may haven't been a sub since 2016 but that's still more than 1000 days as a Gold sub. So way more than a LTS subscription cost.


    EDIT: Actually it's a LOT more than 1000 days:

    44a7e8edd13cf1a913d3ca599d3594ef.jpg

    Sorry it's in French, but it says 1714 days as a Gold sub! And what do you get after paying for 1714 days? (more than 4 years!) "Please buy a LTS or lose all your Gold FF characters".
    Post edited by vylma on
  • Options
    beezeezebeezeeze Posts: 927 Arc User
    I did not read all of this but I feel like people who are currently gold should keep the things they had as gold once they buy a premium pack.(from the point of view of 1 LTS)

  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    beezeeze wrote: »
    I did not read all of this but I feel like people who are currently gold should keep the things they had as gold once they buy a premium pack.(from the point of view of 1 LTS)
    Currently? So potentially a 1 month active Gold sub is better than several years of Gold subscription but currently inactive. That doesn't seem very fair to me. Although I could reactivate my sub before the 7th if I had the insurance that it means that I'm going to keep everything I've got.
  • Options
    beezeezebeezeeze Posts: 927 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    vylma wrote: »
    beezeeze wrote: »
    I did not read all of this but I feel like people who are currently gold should keep the things they had as gold once they buy a premium pack.(from the point of view of 1 LTS)
    Currently? So potentially a 1 month active Gold sub is better than several years of Gold subscription but currently inactive. That doesn't seem very fair to me. Although I could reactivate my sub before the 7th if I had the insurance that it means that I'm going to keep everything I've got.
    I mean if you were gold subbed once and you buy the pack they should basically give you LTS status minus maybe the costumes and titles.

  • Options
    yvonnedyvonned Posts: 147 Arc User
    beezeeze wrote: »
    vylma wrote: »
    beezeeze wrote: »
    I did not read all of this but I feel like people who are currently gold should keep the things they had as gold once they buy a premium pack.(from the point of view of 1 LTS)
    Currently? So potentially a 1 month active Gold sub is better than several years of Gold subscription but currently inactive. That doesn't seem very fair to me. Although I could reactivate my sub before the 7th if I had the insurance that it means that I'm going to keep everything I've got.
    I mean if you were gold subbed once and you buy the pack they should basically give you LTS status minus maybe the costumes and titles.

    the premium pack gives you all the same costume sets you get free as gold now. And, unless they take away titles, you're actually gaining two more. For those of us who have earned titles in game or through veteran rewards, we should not lose them. The loss is the heart and sole of the game - the freeform characters we have spent so much time and money building. I can do without costumes and titles, give me access to may toons!
  • Options
    stergasterga Posts: 2,353 Arc User
    Subscriber / former subscribers cannot purchase the Premium Pack. They claim it on the bonus tab as of June 7th... Supposedly.​​
    YouTube - Steam - Twitter
    [at]riviania Member since Aug 2009
  • Options
    somebobsomebob Posts: 980 Arc User
    yvonned wrote: »
    The loss is the heart and sole of the game - the freeform characters we have spent so much time and money building. I can do without costumes and titles, give me access to may toons!
    This right here.

    What was CO's tagline? "Be the Hero you want to be!" Losing Freeform means you're losing that and in a huge way. As a subscriber, let me keep doing that!
    Owner and Lead Moderator for the Primus Database. Post your Hero today!
    Razira's Primus Database Page
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    somebob wrote: »
    What was CO's tagline? "Be the Hero you want to be!" Losing Freeform means you're losing that and in a huge way. As a subscriber, let me keep doing that!

    Nobody is losing access to freeform. Everyone will still have that. It's weird that I keep seeing these statements pop up that talk as if they're removing freeforms from the game. The rumor mill must be going nuts right now.
  • Options
    somebobsomebob Posts: 980 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    spinnytop wrote: »
    Nobody is losing access to freeform. Everyone will still have that. It's weird that I keep seeing these statements pop up that talk as if they're removing freeforms from the game. The rumor mill must be going nuts right now.
    If you aren't playing the game right this very minute, and suddenly decide to come back to CO after Thursday, and suddenly you find out you can't subscribe to the game again to 'unlock' your Freeforms, then YES, you completely lost access to Freeforms.

    They are removing easy Freeform access from the game. It's just only from people who aren't Lifetimers, and who aren't playing their characters from purchased Freeform slots.

    Us idiots who subscribed to the game for any length of time can quite possibly lose access to their Freeform characters forever without spending $300 for a Lifetime (yes, I know it's on sale right now - that's not the point).
    Owner and Lead Moderator for the Primus Database. Post your Hero today!
    Razira's Primus Database Page
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • Options
    stergasterga Posts: 2,353 Arc User
    Any gold sub that has their sub lapse for any reason after June 7th will lose access to their FFs. The ONLY option that will exist is to pay $200/$300 to reclaim those characters as FFs. That is losing access. It's exactly what happens now when someone drops from gold except without being able to re-sub ever again.

    The context of the discussion matters. We are talking about the gold subscription and the fact it is going away. No longer available. This is what the news post clearly states. The news article also clearly states that you will not be able to re-sub if your subscription lapses after June 7th and the only way to player your FF toons as FF toon is to pay more money for an LTS.

    This is not a discussion about the $50 FF slot. This is a discussion about the sub FF slot.​​
    YouTube - Steam - Twitter
    [at]riviania Member since Aug 2009
  • Options
    magpieuk2014magpieuk2014 Posts: 1,268 Arc User
    spinnytop wrote: »
    Nobody is losing access to freeform. Everyone will still have that. It's weird that I keep seeing these statements pop up that talk as if they're removing freeforms from the game. The rumor mill must be going nuts right now.

    It's a big change and the announcement was unclear and badly worded. They've clearly done some C&P from the STO changes and not actually thought about how it will all relate to this game. I'm not worried about losing my FF characters or being locked - my sub rolled over yesterday and I extended it to 3 months - but I know you agree that they do need to look at people possibly getting locked out (or having to pay a fortune to get back) in if their sub lapses.
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    somebob wrote: »
    If you aren't playing the game right this very minute, and suddenly decide to come back to CO after Thursday, and suddenly you find out you can't subscribe to the game again to 'unlock' your Freeforms, then YES, you completely lost access to Freeforms.

    Wrong, you will still have access to Freeforms via Freeform Character Slots.

    Whether you want to pay for them or not is irrelevant, everyone will still have access to Freeform, that isn't changing. Nobody is "completely losing access to Freeforms". Stop spreading bad information that's just gonna make people go nuts in unproductive ways. If this is simply a problem of how you're stating the issue, then start stating it correctly and stop being deceptive:

    "Subscribers will permanently lose access to their current non-FF slot FF characters if their subscription ends."

    This is the actual problem. Fabricating problems to freak out about helps nobody.
  • Options
    magpieuk2014magpieuk2014 Posts: 1,268 Arc User
    Wrong, you will still have access to Freeforms via Freeform Character Slots.

    At £35 per slot from the Zen Store, or £225 for an LTS.
  • Options
    stergasterga Posts: 2,353 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    There is no such thing as a non-FF slot FF character. There are two different types of FF slots: Sub FF slots and $50 FF slots.

    Context of subject matters for terms of conversation.

    This conversation is not about $50 FF slots. It is about the gold sub FF slots which will be locked and unplayable for gold subscribers that lose their sub after June 7th. The only option at that point is to pay $200/$300 to re-activate their subscriber FF slots. Slots that were actually paid for and will then require an additional, much larger payment, which is 100% relevant to this conversation. $50 FF slots do not matter for this conversation as they cannot be used to re-activate existing gold sub FF slots which are locked.

    Anyone that cannot afford $200/$300 LTS sub has effectively lost access to their paid for, gold sub FF slots as gold sub FF slots.

    If you, Spinny, would like to criticize clarity and accuracy of statements, perhaps it would behoove you to start with yourself. Introducing elements that are not relevant and do not pertain to this conversation do not promote clarity of statements. Not acknowledging the distinction between different types of FF slots does not lend itself to clarity nor accuracy.​​
    YouTube - Steam - Twitter
    [at]riviania Member since Aug 2009
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    At £35 per slot from the Zen Store, or £225 for an LTS.

    Yep. I bought five of the first, and then I bought the second.
    sterga wrote: »
    Introducing elements that are not relevant and do not pertain to this conversation do not promote clarity of statements. Not acknowledging the distinction between different types of FF slots does not lend itself to clarity nor accuracy.

    That would be exactly my point. Glad you agree. Saying "People will lose access to Freeforms" does not promote any clarity on the issue, and it does not acknowledge the distinction between different types of FF slots. I'm glad that you too are keen on promoting accuracy in the statements that people make on this issue. We'd hate for the rumor of "they're getting rid of Freeforms" to spread due to inaccurate statements, wouldn't we?
  • Options
    magpieuk2014magpieuk2014 Posts: 1,268 Arc User
    Yep. I bought five of the first, and then I bought the second.

    Well, if the expectation is that everyone is willing to spend £400 on a computer game, then the game is toast.
  • Options
    themightyzeniththemightyzenith Posts: 4,599 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    Yep. I bought five of the first, and then I bought the second.

    Well, if the expectation is that everyone is willing to spend £400 on a computer game, then the game is toast.

    Especially a 10 year old computer game whose owners just pulled this stunt on some of it's most loyal playerbase. Some of which have already paid large amounts.

    zrdRBy8.png
    Click here to check out my costumes/milleniumguardian (MG) in-game/We need more tights, stances and moods
  • Options
    folv#5303 folv Posts: 96 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    This is one of the most complex changes I've ever seen pushed out by an MMO. It has several complicated changes all wrapped up into one massive overhaul to the way the game's content is accessed/unlocked. Needless to say, the consensus and reality is that it creates a massive paywall in front of what use to be accessible/affordable content. It is trying to solve one issue (the monthly payment plan situation) by creating about three others. My stance isn't hard to break down if you read my opinion on any other threads, but for those who don't assume absolute avarice on the part of those in charge of the changes you have to come to grip with multiple changes.

    Do you agree or disagree with the premium pack idea? Do you agree or disagree with the changes to character slot unlocks? Do you agree or disagree with how Freeform is handled for gold accounts after this change? They've created a situation that complete disregards the expression, "Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater" by lumping all of these changes together. That is undeniably a bad move no matter how you slice it.
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    Yep. I bought five of the first, and then I bought the second.

    Well, if the expectation is that everyone is willing to spend £400 on a computer game, then the game is toast.

    You know magpie, you might want to consider the possibility that I was telling you what I did, not setting some sort of standard. Take a moment, think about it, and get back to me.

    I'm pretty sure that the expectation is "Buy what you want to, don't buy what you don't want to". Anything beyond that is just hyperbolic panicmagination.

    Me personally, I spent about a hundred bucks in the last two or three days. If you want to imagine that that's some sort of expectation or standard, feel free. It certainly sends a clear message about my feelings given the game's value. However it gives no message about my feelings on the game's longevity which is still: It'll be up for however long it'll be up, I'm purchasing these things because I want to use them now, not because I expect the game to be up for X more years.
    folv#5303 wrote: »
    1.Do you agree or disagree with the premium pack idea?
    2. Do you agree or disagree with the changes to character slot unlocks?
    3. Do you agree or disagree with how Freeform is handled for gold accounts after this change?

    1. I think it's great. Color changing without a sub or lts, didn't think we'd get that... well, ever.
    2. I agree with them. What the software/hardware can handle is more important than our nostalgic connection to our characters or the desire to create 100+ more of them. I might at some point have ended up making 100 characters - recently my creation of new characters has accelerated. I'm okay with the fact that I'll likely never get to do that, I can have plenty of fun with 59.
    3. I think it's nuts that they're even mentioning the possibility of subs permanently losing their freeforms - it amazes me that at no point did they talk to someone who told them "That's insane, you're insane, don't do that". They should have looked into a conversion method and had it ready and released before announcing the rest of these changes, not after. With a conversion method already in hand players would already have the method to solve the issue and the only discussion would be about the price. Because they did it in this order, everyone is panicking because we don't know if that conversion method will even materialize. That question should already have been answered, and they should already know if it can't be done, and found some other solution to a glaringly obvious problem, i.e. they should already have a method in place for subscribers to purchase permanent access for their characters in small monetary amounts because that is how subscribers have been spending their money thus far so it stands to reason that is the only way they are able to spend it. Many people simply won't ever be able to drop 200 dollars on a luxury expense, and even those who could save up their monthly 15 bucks for it don't really want to spend over a year waiting to get their FFs back.
  • Options
    raighnraighn Posts: 2,339 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    To repeat something I said in the announcement thread on this subject....

    $15/mo is affordable to most people... $300 one time fee is not affordable to most people... $50/character is not affordable to most people... the cost that the Silver to FF token will undoubtedly have is unlikely to be affordable to most people...

    Unless the FF slot has it's priced reduced, I guarantee you the Silver to FF token will cost around 4,250zen... Why? Simple... 1 character slot = 750zen, 1 FF slot = 5,000zen... 5,000-750=4,250... if they price the Silver to FF token any lower, then it's cheaper to buy silver slots and conversion tokens than to just buy the FF slot.

    So that means that anyone who's subscription lapses would have to spend $42.50 per character to regain access to their FFs. For anyone with more than 7 FFs the LTS is the better financial option...

    You can also look at it this way... Even if they dropped the FF slot cost and were able to sell the conversion tokens at 1500zen... subscribers go from having previously had the option to pay $15/mo for ALL of their freeforms, to paying $15/mo to reclaim 1 FF each month if they lapse their subscription, with the option of paying an additional $15 for each additional FF they want to reclaim that month.

    It is simply NOT a good decision.


    Grandfathering in subscribers is an absolute necessity if they are going to remove the option to resubscribe. Otherwise they are guaranteed to lose players, guaranteed to lose money, and ultimately the game very well could shut down due to this short sighted change.
    ^-^ cute, cuddly, @Pandabutt ^-^
    jniKqKJ.png
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    spinnytop wrote: »
    3. I think it's nuts that they're even mentioning the possibility of subs permanently losing their freeforms - it amazes me that at no point did they talk to someone who told them "That's insane, you're insane, don't do that". They should have looked into a conversion method and had it ready and released before announcing the rest of these changes, not after. With a conversion method already in hand players would already have the method to solve the issue and the only discussion would be about the price. Because they did it in this order, everyone is panicking because we don't know if that conversion method will even materialize.
    I can only partly agree with this, for long time subscribers it shouldn't even be a question about price. All the 800, 1000+ days subscribers have earned the right to keep what they've build if PW/Cryptic decides to remove the monthly subscription. They've paid more than a LTS's worth (some plaid the equivalent of at least 2 LTS), they've contributed more than most to the game. I don't even think of it as a reward, it would just be small gesture from PW/Cryptic to show that we are not just open wallets to them, to show that maybe somehow they acknowledge that we did our part to support the game (and made their pockets a bit fuller).

    Now for those who've been subbed less than year they indeed deserve a better deal than the $300 LTS or $50 unique slot. For them indeed it should be about setting a reasonable price to allow them to keep playing their FF.
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    raighn wrote: »
    $15/mo is affordable to most people... $300 one time fee is not affordable to most people... $50/character is not affordable to most people... the cost that the Silver to FF token will undoubtedly have is unlikely to be affordable to most people...

    Sales and questionite can reduce the price of a slot. I don't know why somebody would be so insistent on paying full price for those things.
    vylma wrote: »
    I can only partly agree with this, for long time subscribers it shouldn't even be a question about price. All the 800, 1000+ days subscribers have earned the right to keep what they've build if PW/Cryptic decides to remove the monthly subscription. They've paid more than a LTS's worth (some plaid the equivalent of at least 2 LTS), they've contributed more than most to the game. I don't even think of it as a reward, it would just be small gesture from PW/Cryptic to show that we are not just open wallets to them, to show that maybe somehow they acknowledge that we did our part to support the game (and made their pockets a bit fuller).

    That would be nice, and very generous of them.
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    I wouldn't go as far as saying generous because it's not like we didn't sink a lot of money into CO, but yes that would be nice. Like I said it would be an appreciated commercial gesture.
  • Options
    magpieuk2014magpieuk2014 Posts: 1,268 Arc User
    Something like.... longtime Gold subscribers paying nothing more for the lifetime right to play their existing Gold characters and to continue to make Freeforms/ATs in new slots, but the account gets no monthly Zen stipend, and all new character slots, retcons and new ATs have to be bought. I'd be happy with that and I'd probably spend £15 a month or so on Zen in lieu of a subscription.
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    I'd be ok with that. Just grant us an unrestricted access to what we had with our Gold subscription. I can live without a monthly stipend and I have no issues with having to go to the store should I need anything more (new character/costume slots, costume pieces, travel powers, retcon/rename tokens etc.).
  • Options
    gatlock1gatlock1 Posts: 6 Arc User
    I have 1045 days as a gold subscriber under my belt.
    And i just cancelled it.

    There is no way i will keep giving money to a company that resort to such practices.

    This change is them tellling me :

    "you already paid for a lot more than a LTS, have been loyal for years, but now if u wanna keep playing we leave you a simple choice :
    never unsub, or pay 200 dollars now".

    Only appropriate answer to this is to leave before it get even uglier.

    When a game company has to resort to this kind of blackmail to grab a few more dollars, it simply doesn't deserve a single cent.

    MMORPG genre is in bad enough place already. We really don't need to encourage the worst of it with our addicted lethargy.


  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    vylma wrote: »
    I wouldn't go as far as saying generous because it's not like we didn't sink a lot of money into CO, but yes that would be nice. Like I said it would be an appreciated commercial gesture.

    It would in fact be generous because there's nothing unfair about expecting people to pay for permanent access, since all this time they've been getting the temporary access they've been paying for already. Just because a rental period ends doesn't mean you own the thing you rented if your accumulated rent equals the total value. Part of the value one gets from rental is the ability to have access to something they could not afford to purchase in full - every single subscriber received this value every month that they paid their sub fee. Simply put, they already got what they paid for and the company has no obligation to stack more value on top of those fees.

    If I was renting you a bouncy castle for several months and then I decided to just give it to you for no further payment that would absolutely be generous. I had no obligation to give you the bouncy castle just because I decided I no longer wanted to rent out bouncy castles and only wanted to sell them. Giving people things with no obligation to do so is pretty much how generosity works.
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    You mean if you were renting me a bouncy castle for years then decide that rent is off the table now but that I can buy a permanent access at the same price as any newcomer and more than what the castle is worth. Oh and of course the castle would still be yours and you'd keep selling permanent access.

    Recognition is not generosity. Generosity doesn't belong to the world of business. It's not because you don't have a legal obligation to do something that you're automatically being generous. I'm not a homeless guy who's starving, I'm a client. And a good one given how much I've spent here (time and money). Grandfathering is not generosity, it's simply good business practice. And that's enough for me I'm not asking for more commitement on their part. Just trying to act like decent shopkeepers would be a lot already.
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    vylma wrote: »
    You mean if you were renting me a bouncy castle for years then decide that rent is off the table now but that I can buy a permanent access at the same price as any newcomer and more than what the castle is worth. Oh and of course the castle would still be yours and you'd keep selling permanent access.

    Eh, you got a little mixed up there. I imagine you're claiming that LTS costs more than it is worth, which is just objectively not true - the value of what you get with LTS far outstrips even the full price, even without infinite slots. Second, the bouncy castle is your account, not the game itself - you're not buying ownership of the IP.
    vylma wrote: »
    Recognition is not generosity. Generosity doesn't belong to the world of business. It's not because you don't have a legal obligation to do something that you're automatically being generous. I'm not a homeless guy who's starving, I'm a client. And a good one given how much I've spent here (time and money). Grandfathering is not generosity, it's simply good business practice. And that's enough for me I'm not asking for more.

    Recognizing that you were only renting your account is perfectly valid. Giving it to you for free even though you yourself made it perfectly clear that you were willing to keep paying for it is absolutely generous. Let's go back to the bouncy castle - you make it clear that you were willing to keep on renting it for the next ten years, but I say I won't take the money and you can just have it. How is that not generous? In the case of the account, you were clearly willing to keep paying for it, so them deciding to just give it to you for free is similarly a generous act.

    If you want to keep debating the nature of rental vs ownership I'd be happy to, but they just delayed the changes and are looking at them again, so as a "let's talk about the changes" conversation this thread just became pointless.
  • Options
    raighnraighn Posts: 2,339 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    spinnytop wrote: »
    raighn wrote: »
    $15/mo is affordable to most people... $300 one time fee is not affordable to most people... $50/character is not affordable to most people... the cost that the Silver to FF token will undoubtedly have is unlikely to be affordable to most people...

    Sales and questionite can reduce the price of a slot. I don't know why somebody would be so insistent on paying full price for those things.

    The sales are irrelivent to the point of my post. Even at the discounted prices of $200 LTS and $25 FF slot, they are STILL not affordable to most people. $25 for a single character slot is too expensive.

    As for questionite... not everyone has the time nor the patience to farm the millions of questionite required to purchase a FF slot... and before you say "they can just farm part of it to reduce the price"... it's still an insane amount of questionite to farm for just 1 slot. lets say you payed for half of the slot with Q and the other half with cash and bought it on sale... that is still almost 600k Q at the current exchange rate.

    Also, just to be clear, incase you forgot... I have an LTS... I will never have to pay the exorbitant price for a FF slot... I will however never be able to buy more than 1 additional character slot after the 7th since I currently have 58 slots.
    spinnytop wrote: »
    vylma wrote: »
    I wouldn't go as far as saying generous because it's not like we didn't sink a lot of money into CO, but yes that would be nice. Like I said it would be an appreciated commercial gesture.

    It would in fact be generous because there's nothing unfair about expecting people to pay for permanent access, since all this time they've been getting the temporary access they've been paying for already. Just because a rental period ends doesn't mean you own the thing you rented if your accumulated rent equals the total value. Part of the value one gets from rental is the ability to have access to something they could not afford to purchase in full - every single subscriber received this value every month that they paid their sub fee. Simply put, they already got what they paid for and the company has no obligation to stack more value on top of those fees.

    If I was renting you a bouncy castle for several months and then I decided to just give it to you for no further payment that would absolutely be generous. I had no obligation to give you the bouncy castle just because I decided I no longer wanted to rent out bouncy castles and only wanted to sell them. Giving people things with no obligation to do so is pretty much how generosity works.

    It's a little something known as good faith business practices... any reputable company, when they change their service policies in a way that would negatively affect existing customers will either A ) grandfather in existing customers with the older policy and a grace period if they have to drop service in which to renew service under the old policy or B ) grant the older customers a significant deal upon switching over to the new policy.

    In this case, they are removing a subscription service that many customers actively use. This isn't simply a change of policy, it is a removal of service. Sure, existing subscribers may be able to retain their subscription, but should their subscription ever end for any reason at all, they are screwed. There is no way to renew a subscription once it has expired under this new system, there is no sort of grace period to allow a customer to renew service, there is no deal offered to existing subscribers upon switching to the new policy either.

    When a company makes a giant change like this to their service, it is expected that they will make every effort possible to retain the loyalty of their existing customer base. Generally these types of changes are made to improve profit margins and to help attract new customers. However, these types of changes have a very high risk of losing existing customers, so it is within the companies best interest to reach out and offer a boon to their existing customers to keep them from leaving.
    ^-^ cute, cuddly, @Pandabutt ^-^
    jniKqKJ.png
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    raighn wrote: »
    The sales are irrelivent to the point of my post. Even at the discounted prices of $200 LTS and $25 FF slot, they are STILL not affordable to most people. $25 for a single character slot is too expensive.

    As for questionite... not everyone has the time nor the patience to farm the millions of questionite required to purchase a FF slot... and before you say "they can just farm part of it to reduce the price"... it's still an insane amount of questionite to farm for just 1 slot. lets say you payed for half of the slot with Q and the other half with cash and bought it on sale... that is still almost 600k Q at the current exchange rate.

    You don't have to farm the entirety of the questionite required to purchase a FF slot, just enough until the point that it becomes affordable. Maybe it becomes affordable at 15 dollars for someone, in which case they only need 1000 zen worth of questionite. I've farmed that much casually before.
    raighn wrote: »
    It's a little something known as good faith business practices... any reputable company, when they change their service policies in a way that would negatively affect existing customers will either A ) grandfather in existing customers with the older policy and a grace period if they have to drop service in which to renew service under the old policy or B ) grant the older customers a significant deal upon switching over to the new policy.

    And for all we know B would have been the case. It's important to recognize that the possibility of an exchange token was immediately part of the announcement and we don't know if subs would have gotten a discount or some sort of special sub version, or even gotten a bunch for free. Also, LTS has always been a significant deal, so in a way B was already in place as an extremely generous package.

    Of course, the changes have been delayed so we're literally talking about nothing now since we don't know how it will change. Been fun debating though o/
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    spinnytop wrote: »
    vylma wrote: »
    You mean if you were renting me a bouncy castle for years then decide that rent is off the table now but that I can buy a permanent access at the same price as any newcomer and more than what the castle is worth. Oh and of course the castle would still be yours and you'd keep selling permanent access.

    Eh, you got a little mixed up there. I imagine you're claiming that LTS costs more than it is worth, which is just objectively not true - the value of what you get with LTS far outstrips even the full price, even without infinite slots. Second, the bouncy castle is your account, not the game itself - you're not buying ownership of the IP.
    vylma wrote: »
    Recognition is not generosity. Generosity doesn't belong to the world of business. It's not because you don't have a legal obligation to do something that you're automatically being generous. I'm not a homeless guy who's starving, I'm a client. And a good one given how much I've spent here (time and money). Grandfathering is not generosity, it's simply good business practice. And that's enough for me I'm not asking for more.

    Recognizing that you were only renting your account is perfectly valid. Giving it to you for free even though you yourself made it perfectly clear that you were willing to keep paying for it is absolutely generous. Let's go back to the bouncy castle - you make it clear that you were willing to keep on renting it for the next ten years, but I say I won't take the money and you can just have it. How is that not generous? In the case of the account, you were clearly willing to keep paying for it, so them deciding to just give it to you for free is similarly a generous act.

    If you want to keep debating the nature of rental vs ownership I'd be happy to, but they just delayed the changes and are looking at them again, so as a "let's talk about the changes" conversation this thread just became pointless.
    You are obviously totally unfamiliar with the concept of good business practice.

    Yes they have the right to act as if everything I've spent means absolutely nothing and treat me as if I was just a new client who barely bought anything from them. That is their right indeed. But that's not what any decent business company would do. That's how you tell those who care about their clients from those who only see them as walking wallets. Now if for you not treating your clients like walking wallet is being generous then fine...

    And you're missing two other crucial points:
    - until now they never said that they would end the service
    - they are intentionally pushing gold subscribers into buying LTS, a move only motivated by the intent to squeeze even more money from them. Quite the opposite of being generous.
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    vylma wrote: »
    You are obviously totally unfamiliar with the concept of good business practice.

    No, you're just wrong when you say giving a renter the option to buy when you end the rental payment method isn't a good business practice. It's completely fair and recognizes the reality of the situation. Giving things away is generosity, which apparently is what you don't understand.
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    spinnytop wrote: »
    No, you're just wrong when you say giving a renter the option to buy when you end the rental payment method isn't a good business practice. It's completely fair and recognizes the reality of the situation. Giving things away is generosity, which apparently is what you don't understand.
    My point exactly, you don't seem to know the difference between good business practice and generosity. And stop with that bouncy castle comparison, it has nothing to do with CO. You don't build anything, you're not investing anything when you're paying for the right to use a boucy castle. With a game like CO it's not just the immediate experience it also about what you've accumulated over the years. When I talk about recognition I mean acknowledging that we've been good clients and helped their company to grow.

    The reality of the situation is that PWI is in a position of strength, they know we care about what we have through our subscription and they're taking advantage of it. I'll say it again but you're obviously deaf to that argument, choosing not to use a position of strength in order to squeeze more money out of your clients is not being generous, having a fidelity program with various bonuses and rewards is not being generous, not treating your long time customers like they're meaningless is not being generous. It has a name it's called good business practice, and that's actually quite precious todays so I'm underestimating its meaning.

    Now if they ever decided to pay my bills, then yeah I'd call that very generous of them. :p

    But we'll see what they'll come up with the premium pack 2.0. Maybe a pleasant surprise. I hope.
  • Options
    stergasterga Posts: 2,353 Arc User
    Most people don't buy LTS because it's f--king expensive. I bet the overwhelming majority of the people with gold subs would jump on a payment plan for LTS. However, Cryptic has never offered one.

    It's Rent-To-Own not a Rent-To-Buy-Again-At-Full-Price. The former is accepted as OK, the latter is a stupid business decision that pisses people off.​​
    YouTube - Steam - Twitter
    [at]riviania Member since Aug 2009
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    vylma wrote: »
    And stop with that bouncy castle comparison, it has nothing to do with CO.

    Your account is a luxury expense that you can live without, and so is a bouncy castle. That's why I chose that comparison. I was originally going to go with a house, but that wouldn't have been accurate.
    sterga wrote: »
    It's Rent-To-Own not a Rent-To-Buy-Again-At-Full-Price. The former is accepted as OK, the latter is a stupid business decision that pisses people off.​​

    It's done in the real world every day. You may not like it, but it is a commonly accepted practice. If you didn't agree to a rent-to-own deal at the outset, then you can't expect it to become one with a formal alteration to the agreement.
  • Options
    vylmavylma Posts: 61 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    Your account is a luxury expense that you can live without, and so is a bouncy castle. That's why I chose that comparison. I was originally going to go with a house, but that wouldn't have been accurate.
    Indeed, if we're going that route: they only provide me with entertainement while I give them money to pay their bills, buy food, clothes, pay their rents etc. :p

    Your whole argument revolves around "It's not in the contract, they don't have to do it" we get it. Don't worry you got your point across. Now what I'm saying is that it is the very definition of commercial gesture/good business practice. All the bonuses you get that were not in the initial deal are exactly this. Many companies and stores do that, not all that's true, but it is not rare either. Some do that formaly with a fidelity program, some other just do that spontaneously. It's not just about being nice, showing to your customers that you care and respect them builds trust and fidelity. It's win-win.
  • Options
    pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User
    sterga wrote: »
    It's Rent-To-Own not a Rent-To-Buy-Again-At-Full-Price. The former is accepted as OK, the latter is a stupid business decision that pisses people off.​​
    Actually, both are accepted as OK, and there are legitimate reasons for either choice, because if both are available, rent-to-own will require higher payments than pure rental.
  • Options
    spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    vylma wrote: »
    Indeed, if we're going that route: they only provide me with entertainement while I give them money to pay their bills, buy food, clothes, pay their rents etc. :p

    They do their jobs in an acceptable fashion, and don't owe you anything more simply because they're human beings with needs of their own.
    vylma wrote: »
    Your whole argument revolves around "It's not in the contract, they don't have to do it" we get it. Don't worry you got your point across. Now what I'm saying is that it is the very definition of commercial gesture/good business practice. All the bonuses you get that were not in the initial deal are exactly this. Many companies and stores do that, not all that's true, but it is not rare either. Some do that formaly with a fidelity program, some other just do that spontaneously. It's not just about being nice, showing to your customers that you care and respect them builds trust and fidelity. It's win-win.

    Yes, sometimes businesses do choose to be generous. That was never in dispute. You were disputing whether it was generous or not to give somebody something for free when you don't have to, remember?
  • Options
    raighnraighn Posts: 2,339 Arc User
    spinnytop wrote: »
    raighn wrote: »
    The sales are irrelivent to the point of my post. Even at the discounted prices of $200 LTS and $25 FF slot, they are STILL not affordable to most people. $25 for a single character slot is too expensive.

    As for questionite... not everyone has the time nor the patience to farm the millions of questionite required to purchase a FF slot... and before you say "they can just farm part of it to reduce the price"... it's still an insane amount of questionite to farm for just 1 slot. lets say you payed for half of the slot with Q and the other half with cash and bought it on sale... that is still almost 600k Q at the current exchange rate.

    You don't have to farm the entirety of the questionite required to purchase a FF slot, just enough until the point that it becomes affordable. Maybe it becomes affordable at 15 dollars for someone, in which case they only need 1000 zen worth of questionite. I've farmed that much casually before.

    Way to not read my post completely. Note the bold part that you clearly didn't actually read... I already adressed that.
    ^-^ cute, cuddly, @Pandabutt ^-^
    jniKqKJ.png
Sign In or Register to comment.