...desaster, treason, whatever?
Did they really expect love after the shitstorm feedback when they attempted this braindead plan the first time?
So the team could at least have the spine to weather the storms instead of silencing the negative feedback, even if they are hell bend to ignore it anyway.
1
Comments
When you own the forum and don't like the concensus... light a match.
I am Took.
"Full plate and packing steel" in NW since 2013.
kudos where kudos is due
Moving feedback from a news section to a cesspool is EXACTLY why they did it, so they DON'T have to deal with increasing amounts of backlash from people reading the news/patch notes. Believe it or not, a large population of the game only wants to know what is new and what's being patched, not what general discussion as to offer. If these individuals saw how much negative feedback was given, this will only fuel the fire further and create a bandwagon effect.
They've just slung faeces in all our faces and you want to give them a pat on the back? Give me a break.
General discussion gets plenty of traffic (I think / guess / assume) and there are ppl posting in here from multiple platforms as well. I'm not sure I'd describe this as a cesspool.
Anyway, regardless they didn't delete this particular thread . . . .
a couple of threads above before I posted this