It is great to see people rising to the challenge of building wikis already, and I hope that this initiative will make the community grow stronger.
I'd like to point out that a second wiki also seems to be in the works.
Perhaps it would benefit everyone if their authors got in touch with each other to share ideas or coordinate efforts?
---
[SIGPIC]Or am I?[/SIGPIC]
This loony is also known as @Derangement.
Yes page is good, but I thought that the wiki is for users, not for administrators.
Instead, some administrator help users in correcting errors in templates.
Mix so that half of the page displays some bad elements.
Instead, make small changes now need to make correction to half wiki pages.
Now well not work the auto making tooltip for infobox,
If another user is not written down on my posts in the community discussion means that there just do not visited there or do not mind against changes what i make.
The solution is ban users who trying to make this wiki look beater!!!
Comments
I'd like to point out that a second wiki also seems to be in the works.
Perhaps it would benefit everyone if their authors got in touch with each other to share ideas or coordinate efforts?
[SIGPIC]Or am I?[/SIGPIC]
This loony is also known as @Derangement.
Instead, some administrator help users in correcting errors in templates.
Mix so that half of the page displays some bad elements.
Instead, make small changes now need to make correction to half wiki pages.
Now well not work the auto making tooltip for infobox,
If another user is not written down on my posts in the community discussion means that there just do not visited there or do not mind against changes what i make.
The solution is ban users who trying to make this wiki look beater!!!
and they plan to leave my 95% of work that they think that was the wrong done
Not recommended for edit pages. No user friendly administrator