test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Discovery/Tardigrade case dismissed

245

Comments

  • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,664 Arc User
    edited September 2019
    (Trolling comments/political comments moderated out. - BMR)
    Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
    dvZq2Aj.jpg
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 5,985 Arc User
    What the judge says goes.
    Case closed
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,664 Arc User
      edited September 2019
      (Trolling comments/political comments moderated out. - BMR)
      Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
      dvZq2Aj.jpg
    • ryan218ryan218 Member Posts: 36,106 Arc User
      edited September 2019

      You do realise criminal cases are decided by jury right? A judge can only sentence someone appropriate for the crime they were found guilty of. That a jury may let a guilty person get away with their crimes is not the Judge's fault, it's either the jury's, or the prosecution's for not proving beyond a reasonable doubt. The Judge has to respect the jury's verdict.

      The Judge's reasoning in this case is sound. Tardigrades are real creatures; their appearance cannot be copyright-protected. It would be like Hannah Barbera suing the creators of Paddington because they made a cartoon about a talking bear first! On top of that is the fact that the plots are not similar, characters only resemble one another visually (in which case, TNG featured a red-headed woman first), and don't even have similar personalities or traits.

      If this is enough for you to rule CBS copied Anas, then Star Trek shouldn't exist because by those rules Star Trek "copied" Buck Rogers. There's a reason copyright law is as strict as it is, and it's to to stop big corporations monopolising specific themes or genres and allow creators to explore similar concepts in their own artistic direction. If the Judge had ruled in Anas' favour, it would have prevented any other creator from using tardigrades in a sci-fi setting for fear of being sued, regardless how they were used.
      Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
    • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,664 Arc User
      edited September 2019
      (Trolling comments/political comments moderated out. - BMR)
      Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
      dvZq2Aj.jpg
    • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
      edited September 2019
      (Trolling comments/political comments moderated out. - BMR)
      Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
    • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,664 Arc User
      edited September 2019
      (Trolling comments/political comments moderated out. - BMR)
      Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
      dvZq2Aj.jpg
    • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,664 Arc User
      I say it's time for Trek to pull a Sherlock and go public domain.
      dvZq2Aj.jpg
    • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,015 Community Moderator
      The evidence clearly shows that Discovery is NOTHING like the guy's game. Season 1 of Discovery takes place in a time of war, which the game does NOT share, the method of travel is totally different from the game, the characters are NOTHING alike, and you can't copyright space as a setting or Tartegrades.

      This had nothing to do with Corporate America ruling the nation. This was about two entities dealing with a lawsuit, and the evidence points to only one conclusion. The Lawsuit is baseless and has been dismissed. The reasons behind the lawsuit were too broad and vague, and there are several non-protectable items such as the setting and tartegrades themselves. He cannot claim ownership of those. It would be like saying no one can make a western movie ever again because of the very first one ever made would make it all copyright infringement and thus untouchable.

      Its explained in detail in the document rather clearly. There is nothing in Discovery that can be considered infringing on Abdin's game.

      Ultimately... CBS can continue to make Discovery, and Abdin can continue to work on his game.

      Can we put this insanity behind us now?
      db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
      I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
      The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    • thevampinatorthevampinator Member Posts: 637 Arc User
      edited September 2019
      People might say discovery copyied this person but because of the main subject of this lawsuit it doesn't matter if they did or not. Tardigrades are real life creatures and do many of the things seen in the show and possibly in the videogame other then the supernatural qualties in either one. Say for example a show maker or game maker sues another company for using humans as a concept. and the lawsuit is won in court by the person sueing. Well then every show that ever exists every thing that ever uses humans would be well hurt by that. If it was a fictional creature that was created by a ip yes then it might be something that would have been won in the court of law but because its shape and purpose acts like the real life version in many ways no one can claim true ownership of it and that is why the tardigrade game maker lost. Tardigrades are off limits for copyright protection just like cats and dogs. Or anything involving talking cats and dogs same concept applies on that one. So any number of ips can have tardigrade spore drive things as a concept. Doesn't matter because its a real creature and not subject to copyright thus off limits to copyright protections. If it was a fictional creature and not based on something that can't be copyrighted. Then yes that would be subject to copyright. But it isn't. So yeah case closed Discovery is here to stay :)
      Post edited by thevampinator on
    • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,231 Arc User
      edited September 2019
      coldnapalm wrote: »
      The similarities in characters is circumstancial at best. And that is the BEST he has going for it. The way the tardigrade is used in the game is NOTHING like what is shown in the Micheal Burnham show. Ant man and the wasp had these critters that were as big as the characters in it...oh no, they stole from Anas AND CBS. Seriously?!? A judge seeing CBS's production notes should have laughed this case out of courts ages ago. Once again, why they did not do this...not sure. I find it odd...but really...yeah. There really wasn't a case.
      If you follow the case events, at one point the judge basically told Abdin to provide proof CBS even knew his game existed. The CORE of his case is the idea CBS copied his work, but how can that be if CBS didn't have access to it? Abdin apparently failed to prove that the CBS writers even knew his game existed.

      (Response to moderated comments removed. - BMR)
      Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      My character Tsin'xing
      Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
    • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 10,309 Community Moderator
      If we can refrain from the political ranting and corporate demonizing, and allow rational discussion to continue, we can keep the thread going.
      GrWzQke.png
      Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
      Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
      Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
      ----> Contact Customer Support <----
      Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
      Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
      Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
      Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
    • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,361 Arc User
      If we can refrain from the political ranting and corporate demonizing, and allow rational discussion to continue, we can keep the thread going.

      Ah, Baddmoon - ever the optimist... :smile:
      Lorna-Wing-sig.png
    • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,015 Community Moderator
      If we can refrain from the political ranting and corporate demonizing, and allow rational discussion to continue, we can keep the thread going.

      We can hope, but I have a feeling "the Beatings will Continue until Morale improves".
      db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
      I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
      The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,007 Arc User
      I say it's time for Trek to pull a Sherlock and go public domain.

      I don’t think you’d like that. You seem to be a TOS fan and you really like that aesthetic. If Star Trek goes public domain all of the TOS look and designs stay at CBS and becomes their version of Star Trek. If WB wanted to do their Star Trek they couldn’t use the ship designs, costume designs, Star fleet delta...they’d have to design their own Trek. The chances of them going Go-Go sixties on the design is slim to none
      Your pain runs deep.
      Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
    • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,963 Arc User
      edited September 2019
      rattler2 wrote: »
      The evidence clearly shows that Discovery is NOTHING like the guy's game. Season 1 of Discovery takes place in a time of war, which the game does NOT share, the method of travel is totally different from the game, the characters are NOTHING alike, and you can't copyright space as a setting or Tartegrades.

      This had nothing to do with Corporate America ruling the nation. This was about two entities dealing with a lawsuit, and the evidence points to only one conclusion. The Lawsuit is baseless and has been dismissed. The reasons behind the lawsuit were too broad and vague, and there are several non-protectable items such as the setting and tartegrades themselves. He cannot claim ownership of those. It would be like saying no one can make a western movie ever again because of the very first one ever made would make it all copyright infringement and thus untouchable.

      Its explained in detail in the document rather clearly. There is nothing in Discovery that can be considered infringing on Abdin's game.

      Ultimately... CBS can continue to make Discovery, and Abdin can continue to work on his game.

      Can we put this insanity behind us now?

      QFT. This is honestly the best possible outcome: the judge ruled the two works are too dissimilar for there to be IP infringement of any kind, meaning both can continue unmolested.

      And Abdin's lawyers were working pro bono, so at worst he's just out filing fees.
      "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
      — Sabaton, "Great War"
      VZ9ASdg.png

      Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
    • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
      khan5000 wrote: »
      I say it's time for Trek to pull a Sherlock and go public domain.

      I don’t think you’d like that. You seem to be a TOS fan and you really like that aesthetic. If Star Trek goes public domain all of the TOS look and designs stay at CBS and becomes their version of Star Trek. If WB wanted to do their Star Trek they couldn’t use the ship designs, costume designs, Star fleet delta...they’d have to design their own Trek. The chances of them going Go-Go sixties on the design is slim to none

      Actually, no. If Star Trek went into the public domain, then anyone could design their version of Star Trek and use whatever ship designs, costume designs, Starfleet insignia, etc that is associated with the Star Trek IP. So different studios could create their own 60s version of Star Trek with the same look as TOS. The public would own Star Trek not a specific corporation. Which is why it is just as likely as Star Trek to go into the public domain as Mickey Mouse go into the public domain.

      It is possible that part of Star Trek would not enter the public domain at the same time as Star Trek like Kzinti in TAS since the rights to the Kzinti belong to Larry Niven and STO had to create the Ferasan to get evil cat aliens due to not being able to get permission.
    • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,664 Arc User
      I'm deffinately gonna get Abdin's game. He won MY respect, while CBS lost mine, more so.

      dvZq2Aj.jpg
    • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,007 Arc User
      This is incorrect. While Star Trek would fall into public domain CBS/Paramount still have trademarked things that wouldn’t go to public domain. So if WB wanted to do Star Trek they could have a Captain Kirk commanding the Enterprise but anything trademarked by CBS/Paramount (ship designs, costume designs, the delta badge) they could not use. An example of this is Sherlock Holmes. There are two tv shows (BBC’s Sherlock and CBS’s Elementary) and the movie series starring RDJ and yet none of these depictions resemble the Rathbone version of the character.



      > @starkaos said:
      > (Quote)
      >
      > Actually, no. If Star Trek went into the public domain, then anyone could design their version of Star Trek and use whatever ship designs, costume designs, Starfleet insignia, etc that is associated with the Star Trek IP. So different studios could create their own 60s version of Star Trek with the same look as TOS. The public would own Star Trek not a specific corporation. Which is why it is just as likely as Star Trek to go into the public domain as Mickey Mouse go into the public domain.
      >
      > It is possible that part of Star Trek would not enter the public domain at the same time as Star Trek like Kzinti in TAS since the rights to the Kzinti belong to Larry Niven and STO had to create the Ferasan to get evil cat aliens due to not being able to get permission.
      Your pain runs deep.
      Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
    • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,280 Arc User
      you know...i've seen the words copyright and trademark for going on 20+ years now...i still have no forking clue what the difference is between them - no one has ever bothered to explain in laymen's terms​​
      Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

      #LegalizeAwoo

      A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
      An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
      A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
      A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


      "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
      "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
      Passion and Serenity are one.
      I gain power by understanding both.
      In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
      I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
      The Force is united within me.
    • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,007 Arc User
      Copyright is the exclusive right, given to the creator of a creative work, to reproduce the work, usually for a limited time. The creative work may be in a literary, artistic or musical form. Copyright is intended to protect the original expression of an idea in the form of a creative work, but not the idea itself.

      A trademark is a type of intellectual property consisting of a recognizable sign, design, or expression which identifies products or services of a particular source from those of others, although trademarks used to identify services are usually called service marks.

      Copyright example: space Navy traveling space in a ship is an idea. Star Trek, Star Wars, Battlestar Galactica all use this idea. However the expression of that idea (Captain Kirk on his five year mission) can be copyrighted. When an expression of the idea is copyrighted it is protected for a certain period of time. I don’t know off the top of my head.

      Trademark is any design companies want to protect. Superman’s \S/, The Disney mouse ears, the Star Fleet Delta are trademarked. These are protected as long as the trademark owners pay the fee.

      So if the Star Trek copyrights fall into public domain anything trademarked (Delta, music, scripts, ship designs, costume designs, Alien designs...) won’t go with.
      Your pain runs deep.
      Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
    • ryan218ryan218 Member Posts: 36,106 Arc User
      khan5000 wrote: »
      Copyright is the exclusive right, given to the creator of a creative work, to reproduce the work, usually for a limited time. The creative work may be in a literary, artistic or musical form. Copyright is intended to protect the original expression of an idea in the form of a creative work, but not the idea itself.

      A trademark is a type of intellectual property consisting of a recognizable sign, design, or expression which identifies products or services of a particular source from those of others, although trademarks used to identify services are usually called service marks.

      Copyright example: space Navy traveling space in a ship is an idea. Star Trek, Star Wars, Battlestar Galactica all use this idea. However the expression of that idea (Captain Kirk on his five year mission) can be copyrighted. When an expression of the idea is copyrighted it is protected for a certain period of time. I don’t know off the top of my head.

      Trademark is any design companies want to protect. Superman’s \S/, The Disney mouse ears, the Star Fleet Delta are trademarked. These are protected as long as the trademark owners pay the fee.

      So if the Star Trek copyrights fall into public domain anything trademarked (Delta, music, scripts, ship designs, costume designs, Alien designs...) won’t go with.

      There's also a difference in how protection of copyrights and trademarks work. A trademark-holder has to defend their trademark or they'll lose it. Copyright-holders have the right to determine when their copyright has been breached. In media terms this is usually at the same point as trademark breaches, since most copyrighted media also includes trademarks.
    • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,280 Arc User
      i still don't get it...it sounds a bit like trademarks can only be filed on specific artistic creations and copyright on executions of those trademarks in a specific way​​
      Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

      #LegalizeAwoo

      A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
      An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
      A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
      A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


      "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
      "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
      Passion and Serenity are one.
      I gain power by understanding both.
      In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
      I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
      The Force is united within me.
    • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,231 Arc User
      i still don't get it...it sounds a bit like trademarks can only be filed on specific artistic creations and copyright on executions of those trademarks in a specific way​​
      Reasonably close.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4ek2WvMgDU
      That might help.
      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      My character Tsin'xing
      Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
    This discussion has been closed.