[PC] Miracle Worker Mega Bundle Stats!

ambassadorkael

It's time for an engineer's favorite part - numbers! Get the stats on the Miracle Worker Mega Bundle!

https://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10684194

jrq2

Not bad stats.

Looks like they sacrificed the Lieutenant hybrid seat to make room for the Universal Console.

nightken

wow, they are pretty much what I thought they would be... and that is not a good thing cause I have no interest in em now.

zhugui

And this is supposed to be worth half a paycheck?

zhugui

coldnapalm wrote: »

> @zhugui said:
> And this is supposed to be worth half a paycheck?

If this is half your paycheck, you need a new job.

Nobody hires IT guys anymore. It's all automated now.

totenmet

Cool another set of ships I can pass by. Not better in DPS then older ships.

borticuscryptic

jrq2 wrote: »

Looks like they sacrificed the Lieutenant hybrid seat to make room for the Universal Console.

No, this is just an error in the blog. They also have Lieutenant-rank hybrid seats.

Operations = Lieutenant Tactical should be Lieutenant Tactical/Miracle Worker
Science = Lieutenant Tactical should be Lieutenant Tactical/Miracle Worker
Tactical = Lieutenant Science should be Lieutenant Science/Miracle Worker

The blog will be updated to reflect this shortly.

allyoftheforce

Don't think I can justify the boff seating for an extra console slot.

lianthelia

What...other weapon types dare had the gall to catch up to FaW so you needed to make a obviously OP trait...that not only extends FaW but gives it a FBP effect...but not just that it's better than FBP because it increases defense.

rhenvar42

I think I will pass on this one as well and wait for the Winter event ship to be announced.

celku

These seem like pretty large ships. You'd think they'd have a hanger bay? I mean it would definitely fit in with their idea of versatility and most of the cruisers in their class seem to be coming with a hanger bay, no?

celku

Oh and the command cruisers have a hanger bay, and these seem to be the next iteration of those designs.

arliekkos

Ugh on the wing design of the Romulan.

where2r1

Wow...look at that hull and turn rate. In total culture shock....
Am a raider lady...so I will stick to BOP and the occasional raptor.

Eh, and will continue bitching about lack of Eng in my Admiralty.

f8explorer

celku wrote: »

These seem like pretty large ships. You'd think they'd have a hanger bay? I mean it would definitely fit in with their idea of versatility and most of the cruisers in their class seem to be coming with a hanger bay, no?

Has that universal console instead.

martakurill

What's with that last line on the blog about reflective hull 3? Is that a feature, or more likely, a typo??

tilarta

Console - Universal – Crimson Forcefield

Originally invented by Geordi La Forge as a ruse to outwit his would-be captors, this piece of technology eventually ended up being made into reality many years later. Although it was originally intended to cripple only the weapon systems of a number of enemy combatants, it's final design also ended up having a debilitating effect on the enemies' ability to repair any damage their ship has sustained.

This console also provides a passive boost to Starship Hull Penetration Skill, and Bonus Earned Experience.

Clarification required, is that a console that can be equipped on any ship or only these ships?
If it wasn't limited to the ships in the bundle and could be equipped on whatever ship my characters are using, then I'd be interested in acquiring the tactical ships for this console alone.

drvghost

Wow I see ALOT of Bitching on here About Looks And about Wahh WAHHH NO HANGER BAY I think ill pass and a bunch of other TRIBBLE that don't matter !!! wow guy how about I will be the first to say I love the Design of the KDF & ROM Ships they Look sick AF not a fan of the Bulky look of the FED ships but still Its deff different and Mad props On Overall Stats and I LOVE the Miracle Worker Specialization Absolutely LOVE it and these ships are Perfect for it Ill be buying the ROM Ship as soon as its available I do like to see Hanger Bays aswell but I'm not gonna Cry over it !! Amazing job on Design and Balanced stats STO Keep up the good work

avoozuul

Sigh, yet another 3x lieutenant 1x ltcom seating. Don't get me wrong I have almost all T6 ships with such a setup, only ships I don't have are the temporal dread and escort, guardian, jupiter, and science and operations command battlecruisers, I just wish this one wouldn't follow that particular seating setup.

rykiroz

Why are these new ships always so ugly looking?

grumpyowl

lianthelia wrote: »

What...other weapon types dare had the gall to catch up to FaW so you needed to make a obviously OP trait...that not only extends FaW but gives it a FBP effect...but not just that it's better than FBP because it increases defense.

Personally, I'm waiting too see if there will be another Bait-And-Switch like they pulled with the Hit and Run trait. Seems almost too good to last to me. They'll wait a few weeks so the thing sells and then NERF the trait into oblivion just like the Caitian Shikaris. I'm still a bit put off by that fiasco.

djf021

Ok these look nice. Sold on the Tucker Class. That's a nice trait.

slifox

I don’t know. I don’t like the designs. Perhaps I’ll pick up one for my KDF so I can play with miracle worker a bit and call it good.

strathkin

jrq2 wrote: »

Not bad stats.

Looks like they sacrificed the Lieutenant hybrid seat to make room for the Universal Console.

Not quite sure I follow.

Most Tier 6 Ships (Tac Ody for example) has 1 Ensign, 1 Lt, 2 Lt.Commander, 1 Commander = 5 Seats
Others like SCI Command Battlecruiser's have: 3 Lt, 1 Lt.Commander, 1 Commander = 5 Seats.

Miracle Worker generally has: 1 Ensign, 1 Lt, 2 Lt.Comm, 1 Commander = 5 Seats.

So in essence while the seating does change around a little depending on the ship type or class all Tier 6 have five seats.

evilmark444

Words cannot describe how hideous those Fed ships are ... just slightly better than the Dyson ships, but that's not saying much ...

What happened Cryptic? You've been on such a roll art wise, and then you come up with ... these abominations??

burstdragon323

TO: Fleet Admiral Marrone, Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards
FROM: Fleet Admiral Zolaria Ten'Ra, Head of Starfleet Intelligence division Code Name "Orion Cygnus"

SUBJECT: The new Block of Engineering Ships

FA Marrone,

As a CO of a Starship, there are those of us who take pride in the designs that UPFM develop and release for us to use.

Unfortunately, this latest block of ships reaffirms why I never requisitioned the Odyssey Star Cruisers. That giant gap in the hull is the greatest weakness of the ship, one I brought up when the Initial design for the new Flagship was revealed.

Do you realize that in over several hundred simulations, we were able to destroy the flagship, just by flying a fighter into the gap and self-destructing? The same critical flaw exists for these ships, and if this design aesthetic persists, the fleet as a whole is in jeopardy.

Please consider this issue in future designs, and consider the number of lives that can be lost with each of the ships that are destroyed in such a fashion.

Regards,
FA Ten'Ra

angrytarg

All in all I like the fed ships quite a lot, save some nacelle placements here and there and the Tucker saucer. But the rest is nice and chubby. The Klingon ships are nice variations of known aesthetics, I like the "tilted head" on that one design. The Romulan ships are really "meh". Nothimg about those elevates me, only Rombships I like are the canonical ones from TOS to TNG, the others are rather boring.