test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Feedback› Federation Discussion

Galaxy-X is OP plz Nerf!! LOL!

captainkroncaptainkron Member Posts: 123 Arc User
edited April 2015 in Federation Discussion
So, I took the revamped ship in a few puged stfs. After separation as we engaged the first cube, I noticed when i fired the antimatter spread that the saucer fired its antimatter spread too. So I was like oh two fer! Now the saucer did not stay alive long LOL! But the maneuverability of the battle bridge section was nice. It was like an escort without the Lt Cmdr seating. ha ha. I was able to slot Bfaw I, Torp spread I, and Beta I. So no all powerful TacTeam to slow me down. LOL! I did fire the lance spread which did hit the Cube and Gate at 5k. :) Going back to maneuverability, with Quantum wide-180 on front and Torp spread don't think a single torp ever missed. :) Conclusion this ship is way to powerful for the casual gamer. :)
CibJ7qu.jpg?1
Post edited by captainkron on

Comments

  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Yup. Definitely OP. It out-DPSs and out-tanks my Odyssey and FACR. It's too stronk! Needs nerf-hammer! NAO!!!
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    They need to nerf the wide beam, and place more power, more accuracy, and less weapon energy drain into the standard Spinal Lance.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • projectfrontierprojectfrontier Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    captainkron wrote: »
    So, I took the revamped ship in a few puged stfs. After separation as we engaged the first cube, I noticed when i fired the antimatter spread that the saucer fired its antimatter spread too. So I was like oh two fer! Now the saucer did not stay alive long LOL! But the maneuverability of the battle bridge section was nice. It was like an escort without the Lt Cmdr seating. ha ha. I was able to slot Bfaw I, Torp spread I, and Beta I. So no all powerful TacTeam to slow me down. LOL! I did fire the lance spread which did hit the Cube and Gate at 5k. :) Going back to maneuverability, with Quantum wide-180 on front and Torp spread don't think a single torp ever missed. :) Conclusion this ship is way to powerful for the casual gamer. :)

    You need to stop trolling
    stardestroyer001 wrote: »
    They need to nerf the wide beam, and place more power, more accuracy, and less weapon energy drain into the standard Spinal Lance.

    You mean this.
    Proposals for using in-game features to improve: (1) the "Phaser Lance" (and other underrepresented/missing "big guns"); && (2) separation systems on all ships that have them; && (3) training boffs in captain only powers by using boffs as pack-mules; OR to add functionality like: (4) "Away Teams Of Space Ships";
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • captainkroncaptainkron Member Posts: 123 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Being all serious with thousands of post from the community about a revamp has helped drive in the product we now have. Own it and move on. I bought the Dreadnought last year so did not qualify for the bundle, but I went and bought the Venture and Retro during sale. Why you might ask cause like most of the community I Luv this game. I found this game late but have been playing every day for past year and any support I can give to keep it going I will continue to do. Just hope it dont go the way or City of Heroes a friend of mine told me about. He loved that game and when i ask him about it he still gets sad.
    CibJ7qu.jpg?1
  • puttenhamputtenham Member Posts: 1,052 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    captainkron wrote: »
    Being all serious with thousands of post from the community about a revamp has helped drive in the product we now have. Own it and move on. I bought the Dreadnought last year so did not qualify for the bundle, but I went and bought the Venture and Retro during sale. Why you might ask cause like most of the community I Luv this game. I found this game late but have been playing every day for past year and any support I can give to keep it going I will continue to do. Just hope it dont go the way or City of Heroes a friend of mine told me about. He loved that game and when i ask him about it he still gets sad.

    let me get this straight. you bought and spent money on something you didn't even plan on using, or want, just to give cryptic cash?? this is one of the many reasons they don't get metrics, next timeyou want to spend money, buy keys or something.. lol..

    supporting your game is one thing, randomly spending money on TRIBBLE you don't want is just a little crazy.. you must be oprah rich..
  • corbinwolf#9797 corbinwolf
    corbinwolf#9797
         Member Posts: 565 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    I was never a fan of the aesthetics of this ship and admittedly its lack of tactical consoles amongst other things put me off even trying it. However, with the revamp, I have to say I was curious and so I bought the fleet dreadnought. I have to admit, dunno why folks are so unhappy with it. Managed to be the top damage dealer in three out of four PVP matches (random pugs vs premades) and in PVE I have yet to die. Sure, there are things I agree with what folks are saying about it but that being said, my damage is equal too if not on par with my fleet excelsior at the moment. The build is a typical a2b build with your specialized consoles, etc...

    I haven't decided yet if he bay is useless and I haven't bothered outfitting the cloak and antimatter spread console, not to mention the saucer separation. Is it really worth it?
    "The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place and I don't care how tough you are it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward." - Rocky Balboa (2006)
  • gofasternowgofasternow Member Posts: 1,390 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    bugspatteredjack wrote: »
    I was never a fan of the aesthetics of this ship and admittedly its lack of tactical consoles amongst other things put me off even trying it. However, with the revamp, I have to say I was curious and so I bought the fleet dreadnought. I have to admit, dunno why folks are so unhappy with it. Managed to be the top damage dealer in three out of four PVP matches (random pugs vs premades) and in PVE I have yet to die. Sure, there are things I agree with what folks are saying about it but that being said, my damage is equal too if not on par with my fleet excelsior at the moment. The build is a typical a2b build with your specialized consoles, etc...

    I haven't decided yet if he bay is useless and I haven't bothered outfitting the cloak and antimatter spread console, not to mention the saucer separation. Is it really worth it?

    The cloak isn't really worth it. Since it doesn't hold any big bonuses, I'd say go ahead and dump it. HOWEVER, the Antimatter Spread and Saucer Separation consoles ARE worth it: Saucer Separation alone gives you a big boost - for -5-10% Hull HP and Shields, you gain +10 turn rate, which puts you at a base ranking of 16 turn, up there with most basic Escorts. Antimatter Spread is good for getting opponents off your tail if you're swamped, but together they make it worthwhile as they increase your defense and turn (the description says +20 Hull Defense and one other and a +1 Turn, but the Turn rate actually feels more like a +2, which puts it up there with the Excelsior and the Heavy Cruiser. Separated, that means your base turn is now 17-18.

    Add that with the abilities to mount Dual Cannons and you got a very basic beast here. It's no Avenger, but as you're seeing, it's not something to laugh at anymore.
  • westx211westx211 Member Posts: 42,213 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    The lance is back to its original powerful state before an age old Nerf and I say leave it like that.
    Men are not punished for their sins, but by them.
  • maxvitormaxvitor Member Posts: 2,213 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    westx211 wrote: »
    The lance is back to its original powerful state before an age old Nerf and I say leave it like that.
    Just please put it in the middle of the saucer, ya I know I'm sounding like a broken record but for a revamped ship they should've fixed it.
    Anyway I like my Dreadnaught, I liked it before the revamp and I still like it, I have fun with it.
    If something is not broken, don't fix it, if it is broken, don't leave it broken.
    Oh Hell NO to ARC
  • gogereavergogereaver Member Posts: 166 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    with the skill changes they made that thing from hard to kill to dammed inpossable. people are just to used to the likes of the avenger i still pull out my retro fit from time to time just to have fun.
  • vargoth1337vargoth1337 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    correct me if i'm wrong but did they nerf the lance by not letting us use beam overload with it??
  • captainkroncaptainkron Member Posts: 123 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Is this a necro or not old enuf? Anyway I guess spending money on the Galaxy variants helped in a small way to finally get a Tier 6 Galaxy... So as a community, we can finally stop whining about this... oh wait... you got to buy a fleet module to get fleet variant... the whining begins.. :) :rolleyes:
    CibJ7qu.jpg?1
  • vargoth1337vargoth1337 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    still waiting for an answer about beam overload and the lance
  • nataku302nataku302 Member Posts: 138 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    hmm what happens if they do make a tier 6 galaxy X and gave it a LT commander Sci station.
  • chilleechillee Member Posts: 176 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    vargoth1337 wrote: »
    still waiting for an answer about beam overload and the lance

    Beam Overload has not worked with lance for a long time... if ever. It is not supposed to.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.